Professor Dr. Stefan Eichler

Professor Dr. Stefan Eichler
Aktuelle Position

seit 10/16

Professor für International Monetary Economics 

Technische Universität Dresden

seit 4/14

Leiter der Forschungsgruppe Marktstrukturen im Finanzsektor und Finanzstabilität

Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH)

Forschungsschwerpunkte

  • Finanzkrisen
  • Geldpolitik
  • Wechselkurse
  • internationale Investitionen

Seit Oktober 2016 ist Stefan Eichler Professor für Internationale Monetäre Ökonomik an der Technischen Universität Dresden. Am IWH leitet er die Forschungsgruppe "Marktstrukturen im Finanzsektor und Finanzstabilität".

Nach seinem Studium der Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Technischen Universität Chemnitz und der Technischen Universität Dresden promovierte Stefan Eichler im Januar 2012 zum Thema „Exchange Rate Expectations, Currency Crises, and the Pricing of American Depositary Receipts”. Von Oktober 2013 bis März 2014 war Stefan Eichler Lehrstuhlvertreter an der Technischen Universität Dresden. Von April bis September 2014 war er Juniorprofessor für "International Macroeconomics and Finance" an der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg. Von Oktober 2014 bis September 2016 war er Professor für "Geld und Internationale Finanzwirtschaft" an der Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Ihr Kontakt

Professor Dr. Stefan Eichler
Professor Dr. Stefan Eichler
Mitglied - Abteilung Finanzmärkte
Nachricht senden

Publikationen

Central bank transparency and cross-border banking

Stefan Eichler Helge Littke Lena Tonzer

in: Journal of International Money and Finance , Nr. 6, 2017

Abstract

We analyze the effect of central bank transparency on cross-border bank activities. Based on a panel gravity model for cross-border bank claims for 21 home and 47 destination countries from 1998 to 2010, we find strong empirical evidence that a rise in central bank transparency in the destination country, on average, increases cross-border claims. Using interaction models, we find that the positive effect of central bank transparency on cross-border claims is only significant if the central bank is politically independent and operates in a stable economic environment. Central bank transparency and credibility are thus considered complements by banks investing abroad.

Publikation lesen

National Politics and Bank Default Risk in the Eurozone

Stefan Eichler Karol Sobanski

in: Journal of Financial Stability , 2016

Abstract

We study the impact of national politics on default risk of eurozone banks as measured by the stock market-based Distance to Default. We find that national electoral cycles, the power of the government as well as the government’s party ideological alignment significantly affect the stability of banks in the eurozone member countries. Moreover, we show that the impact of national politics on bank default risk is more pronounced for large as well as weakly capitalized banks.

Publikation lesen

The political determinants of government bond holdings

Stefan Eichler T. Plaga

in: Journal of International Money and Finance , Nr. 5, 2017

Abstract

This paper analyzes the link between political factors and sovereign bond holdings of US investors in 60 countries over the 2003–2013 period. We find that, in general, US investors hold more bonds in countries with few political constraints on the government. Moreover, US investors respond to increased uncertainty around major elections by reducing government bond holdings. These effects are particularly significant in democratic regimes and countries with sound institutions, which enable effective implementation of fiscal consolidation measures or economic reforms. In countries characterized by high current default risk or a sovereign default history, US investors show a tendency towards favoring higher political constraints as this makes sovereign default more difficult for the government. Political instability, characterized by the fluctuation in political veto players, reduces US investment in government bonds. This effect is more pronounced in countries with low sovereign solvency.

Publikation lesen

Arbeitspapiere

cover_DP_2016-16.jpg

Central Bank Transparency and Cross-border Banking

Stefan Eichler Helge Littke Lena Tonzer

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere , Nr. 16, 2016

Abstract

We analyze the effect of central bank transparency on cross-border bank activities. Based on a panel gravity model for cross-border bank claims for 21 home and 47 destination countries from 1998 to 2010, we find strong empirical evidence that a rise in central bank transparency in the destination country, on average, increases cross-border claims. Using interaction models, we find that the positive effect of central bank transparency on cross-border claims is only significant if the central bank is politically independent. Central bank transparency and credibility are thus considered complements by banks investing abroad.

Publikation lesen

cover_DP_2016-15.jpg

Regional Banking Instability and FOMC Voting

Stefan Eichler T. Lähner Felix Noth

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere , Nr. 15, 2016

Abstract

This study analyzes if regionally affiliated Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members take their districts’ regional banking sector instability into account when they vote. Considering the period from 1978 to 2010, we find that a deterioration in a district’s bank health increases the probability that this district’s representative in the FOMC votes to ease interest rates. According to member-specific characteristics, the effect of regional banking sector instability on FOMC voting behavior is most pronounced for Bank presidents (as opposed to governors) and FOMC members who have career backgrounds in the financial industry or who represent a district with a large banking sector.

Publikation lesen

cover_DP_2016-14.jpg

The Political Determinants of Government Bond Holdings

Stefan Eichler T. Plaga

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere , Nr. 14, 2016

Abstract

This paper analyzes the link between political factors and sovereign bond holdings of US investors in 60 countries over the 2003-2013 period. We find that, in general, US investors hold more bonds in countries with few political constraints on the government. Moreover, US investors respond to increased uncertainty around major elections by reducing government bond holdings. These effects are particularly significant in democratic regimes and countries with sound institutions, which enable effective implementation of fiscal consolidation measures or economic reforms.

Publikation lesen
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoWeltoffen Logo