25 Jahre IWH

Dr. Peter Bönisch

Dr. Peter Bönisch
Aktuelle Position

seit 6/12

Research Affiliate

Leibniz-Insitut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH)

 

Forschungsschwerpunkte

  • Humankapital

Zurzeit unterstützt Peter Bönisch vornehmlich IWH-Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von sozialen Normen und Humankapitalmobilität.

Seine methodische Expertise hat er insbesondere im Rahmen der IWH-Projekte zur Selektivität von Mobilitätsprozessen und zur Effizienz lokaler politischer Organisationsformen eingebracht. Peter Bönisch wurde am Lehrstuhl für Ökonometrie an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg promoviert.

Ihr Kontakt

Dr. Peter Bönisch
Dr. Peter Bönisch
Mitglied - Abteilung Strukturwandel und Produktivität
Nachricht senden Persönliche Seite

Publikationen

(De-)Centralization and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from German Municipalities

Claus Michelsen Peter Bönisch

in: Public Choice , Nr. 3, 2014

Abstract

A vast academic literature illustrates that voter turnout is affected by the institutional design of elections (e.g., compulsory voting, electoral system, postal or Sunday voting). In this article, we exploit a simple Downsian theoretical framework to argue that the institutional framework of public good provision – and, in particular, the distribution of political and administrative competences across government levels – likewise affects voters’ turnout decisions by influencing the expected net benefit of voting. Empirically, we exploit the institutional variation across German municipalities to test this proposition, and find supportive evidence.

Publikation lesen

cover_european-journal-of-political-economy.png

The Social Capital Legacy of Communism-results from the Berlin Wall Experiment

Peter Bönisch Lutz Schneider

in: European Journal of Political Economy , Nr. 32, 2013

Abstract

In this paper we establish a direct link between the communist history, the resulting structure of social capital, and attitudes toward spatial mobility. We argue that the communist regime induced a specific social capital mix that discouraged geographic mobility even after its demise. Theoretically, we integrate two branches of the social capital literature into one more comprehensive framework distinguishing an open type and a closed type of social capital. Using the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) we take advantage of the natural experiment that separated Germany into two parts after the WWII to identify the causal effect of social capital on mobility. We estimate a three equation ordered probit model and provide strong empirical evidence for our theoretical propositions.

Publikation lesen

cover_european-journal-of-political-economy.png

David and Goliath in the Poll Booth: An Empirical Test of the Effect of Absolute and Relative Group Size on Voter Turnout

Peter Bönisch B. Geys Claus Michelsen

in: European Journal of Political Economy , 2013

Publikation lesen

Arbeitspapiere

Television Role Models and Fertility: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Peter Bönisch Walter Hyll

in: SOEPpapers, Nr. 752 , Nr. 752, 2015

Abstract

In this paper we study the effect of television exposure on fertility. We exploit a natural experiment that took place in Germany after WWII. For topographical reasons, Western TV programs, which promoted one/no child families, could not be received in certain parts of East Germany. Using an IV approach, we find robust evidence that watching West German TV results in lower fertility. This conclusion is robust to alternative model specifications and data sets. Our results imply that individual fertility decisions are affected by role models or information about other ways of life promoted by media.

Publikation lesen

Social Capital and Migration Preferences - An Empirical Analysis for the Case of the Reunified Germany

Peter Bönisch Lutz Schneider Walter Hyll

in: Grincoh Working Papers July 2013 , 2013

Abstract

We focus on the relevance of different types of social capital on migration intentions in the context of shrinking regions. On the one hand, formal social capital characterised by weak ties without local roots is supposed to drive selectivity and outmigration. On the other hand, informal social capital stressing strong ties to friends, relatives or neighbours might hinder migration. In our regression results we do not find an effect of shrinking regions on mobility intentions. Thus, living in a shrinking area is by itself not a reason to move away or to invest less in social capital. However, if an individual considers to move away she reduces her participation in informal and formal networks. Individuals characterised by strong informal ties, i.e. strong relationships to friends, rel atives or neighbours show a significantly lower probability of moving away. And, more qualified types of social capital as participation in local politics or initiatives seem to encourage spatial mobility.

Publikation lesen

Cover_IWH-Discussion-Papers_2016.jpg

Vertical Grants and Local Public Efficiency

Ivo Bischoff Peter Bönisch Peter Haug Annette Illy

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere , Nr. 1, 2013

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of vertical grants on local public sector efficiency. First, we develop a theoretical model in which the bureaucrat sets the tax price while voters choose the quantity of public services. In this model, grants reduce efficiency if voters do not misinterpret the amount of vertical grants the local bureaucrats receive. If voters suffer from fiscal illusion, i.e. overestimate the amount of grants, our model yields an ambiguous effect of grants on efficiency. Second, we use the model to launch a note of caution concerning the inference that can be drawn from the existing cross-sectional studies in this field: Taking into account vertical financial equalization systems that reduce differences in fiscal capacity, empirical studies based on cross-sectional data may yield a positive relationship between grants and efficiency even when the underlying causal effect is negative. Third, we perform an empirical analysis for the German state of Saxony-Anhalt, which has implemented such a fiscal equalization system. We find a positive relationship between grants and efficiency. Our analysis shows that a careful reassessment of existing empirical evidence with regard to this issue seems necessary.

Publikation lesen
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoWeltoffen Logo