Competitive Distortions of Bank Bailouts
Michael Koetter, Felix Noth
Abstract
This study investigates if the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) distorted price competition in U.S. banking. Political indicators reveal bailout expectations after 2009, manifested as beliefs about the predicted probability of receiving equity support relative to failing during the TARP disbursement period. In addition, the TARP affected the competitive conduct of unsupported banks after the program stopped in the fourth quarter of 2009. Loan rates were higher, and the risk premium required by depositors was lower for banks with higher bailout expectations. The interest margins of unsupported banks increased in the immediate aftermath of the TARP disbursement but not after 2010. No effects emerged for loan or deposit growth, which suggests that protected banks did not increase their market shares at the expense of less protected banks.
Read article
Germany’s “Bazaar-economy” After the Financial and Economic Crisis
Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Udo Ludwig
Klaus Voy (Ed.): Außenhandel und Globalisierung in gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht. Marburg: Metropolis,
2018
Abstract
Because of its huge dependence on the world markets, Germany’s economy was strongly hit by the financal and economic crisis in 2008/2009. Applying the input-output model, the paper deals with the net-impact of the export shock on value added and employment in Germany.
Read article
Konjunktur. Relevanz von Unternehmensumfragen für Diagnose und Analyse
Thomas Brockmeier, Udo Ludwig
T. Brockmeier und U. Ludwig (Hrsg.), Konjunktur. Relevanz von Unternehmensumfragen für Diagnose und Analyse. Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale),
2017
Abstract
„Geh’n Sie mit der Konjunktur!“, so lautete der Refrain eines Gassenhauers aus den sogenannten Wirtschaftswunder-Zeiten der noch jungen Bundesrepublik. Doch hat die Konjunktur noch Konjunktur? Ist Konjunkturpolitik (noch) sinnvoll, ist sie überhaupt relevant? Wenn nein, warum nicht? Wenn ja, unter welchen Voraussetzungen? Welche Bedeutung haben Konjunkturumfragen für eine zuverlässige und zugleich rasche Beurteilung der aktuellen wirtschaftlichen (i. e. „konjunkturellen“) Lage? Haben solche Umfragen, wie sie beispielsweise das Münchner ifo Institut, aber auch die Industrie- und Handelskammern durchführen, Bedeutung für Wissenschaft und Forschung oder auch für die praktische Wirtschaftspolitik? Wie steht es um das Verhältnis zwischen Konjunktur und Wachstum? Wie wichtig ist die Saisonbereinigung? Was genau verbirgt sich eigentlich hinter der „Geschäftslage“? Diese und ähnliche Fragen wurden auf einer Fachtagung diskutiert, zu der die Industrie- und Handelskammer Halle-Dessau im April 2016 renommierte Konjunkturforscher eingeladen hatte. Anlass war die Veröffentlichung ihres 100. Konjunkturberichts. Zu den Referenten zählten Klaus Abberger (Konjunkturforschungsstelle / KOF der ETH Zürich), Roland Döhrn (RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen) und Udo Ludwig (ehem. IWH – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle). Der vorliegende Sammelband bringt die Referate und Diskussionsbeiträge zusammen, ergänzt um Literaturhinweise und Hintergrundinformationen. Deutlich wird: Konjunkturumfragen leisten wichtige Beiträge für Politik, Wissenschaft und selbst für Unternehmen: Aus den rasch vorliegenden Ergebnissen solcher Umfragen lassen sich Schlüsse für eine recht zuverlässige Beurteilung der aktuellen wirtschaftlichen Situation wie auch für eine „bessere“ Wirtschaftspolitik ziehen. Aber auch die Grenzen hinsichtlich Methodik und Reichweite von Unternehmensumfragen werden thematisiert. Das Buch liefert eine wertvolle Bestandsaufnahme – nicht nur für Experten, sondern auch und insbesondere für ökonomisch interessierte Laien.
Read article
Business Surveys By the Chamber of Industry and Commerce Halle-Dessau and the Economic Development in the Region
Udo Ludwig
T. Brockmeier und U. Ludwig (Hrsg.), Konjunktur. Relevanz von Unternehmensumfragen für Diagnose und Analyse. Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale),
2017
Abstract
Do surveys of firms about their business climate reflect their sentiments only or are they also a reliable indicator for the course of the business cycle? Applying the correlation analysis it is shown, that there exists a statistically significant positive relationship only fort he entirety of firms and the producers of industrial goods but not for the individual branches of services.
Read article
Living with Lower Productivity Growth: Impact on Exports
Filippo di Mauro, Bernardo Mottironi, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Alessandro Zona-Mattioli
IWH-CompNet Discussion Papers,
No. 1,
2018
Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of sustained lower productivity growth on exports, by looking at the role of the productivity distribution and allocative efficiency as drivers of export performance. It follows and goes beyond the work of Barba Navaretti et al. (2017), analysing the effects of productivity on exports depending on the dynamics of allocative efficiency. Low productivity growth is a well-documented stylised fact in Western countries – and possibly a reality likely to persist for some time. What could be the impact of persistent sluggish growth of productivity on exports? To shed light on this question, this paper examines the relationship between the productivity distribution of firms and sectoral export performance. The structure of firms within countries or even sectors matters tremendously for the nexus between productivity and exports at the macroeconomic level, as the theoretical and empirical literature documents. For instance, whether too few firms at the top (lack of innovation) or too many firms at the bottom (weak market selection) drives slow average productivity at the macro level has very different implications and therefore demands different policy responses.
Read article
The Ex Ante versus Ex Post Effect of Public Guarantees
H. Evren Damar, Reint E. Gropp, Adi Mordel
The Role of Central Banks in Financial Stability: How has it Changed?,
2013
Abstract
In October 2006, Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS) introduced new ratings for banks that account for the potential of government support. The rating changes are not a reflection of any changes in the respective banks’ credit fundamentals. We use this natural experiment to evaluate the consequences of bail out expectations for bank behavior using a difference in differences approach. The results suggest a striking difference between the effects of bail out probabilities during calm times (“ex ante”) versus during crisis times (“ex post”). During calm times, higher bail-out probabilities result in higher risk taking, consistent with the moral hazard view and much of the empirical literature. However, in crisis times, we find that banks with higher bail out probabilities tend to increase their risk taking less compared to banks that were ex ante unlikely to be bailed-out. Charter values are one part of the explanation: Supported banks may have a funding advantage relative to non-supported banks during the crisis. However, we cannot rule out that other factors also may be playing a role, including tighter supervision of supported banks in crisis times.
Read article
How Important are Hedge Funds in a Crisis?
Reint E. Gropp
FRBSF Economic Letters, No. 11,
No. 11,
2014
Abstract
Before the 2007–09 crisis, standard risk measurement methods substantially underestimated the threat to the financial system. One reason was that these methods didn’t account for how closely commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies were linked. As financial conditions worsened in one type of institution, the effects spread to others. A new method that more accurately accounts for these spillover effects suggests that hedge funds may have been central in generating systemic risk during the crisis.
Read article
Sovereign Credit Risk, Banks' Government Support, and Bank Stock Returns around the World: Discussion of Correa, Lee, Sapriza, and Suarez
Reint E. Gropp
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 46 (s1),
s1
2014
Abstract
In the years leading up to the 2008–09 financial crisis, many banks around the world greatly expanded their balance sheets to take advantage of cheap and abundantly available funding. Access to international funding markets, in particular, made it possible for banks to reach a size that in some cases was a large multiple of their home countries’ gross domestic product (GDP). In Iceland, for example, assets of the banking system reached up to 900% of GDP in 2007. Similarly, by the end of 2008, assets in UK and Swiss banks exceeded 500% of their countries’ GDPs, respectively. Banks may also have grown rapidly because they may have wanted to reach too-big-to-fail status in their country, implying even lower funding cost (Penas and Unal 2004).
The depth and severity of the 2008–09 financial crisis and the subsequent debt crisis in Europe, however, have cast doubts on the ability of governments to bail out banks when they experience severe difficulties, in particular, in financially fragile environments and faced with large budget imbalances. This has resulted in as what some observers have dubbed a “doom loop”: the combination of weak public finances and weak banks results in a vicious cycle, in which the funding cost of banks increases, as the ability of governments to bail out banks is called into question, in turn increasing the funding cost of these banks and making the likelihood that the government will actually have to step in even higher, which in turn increases funding cost to the government and so forth.
Against this background, the paper by Correa et al. (2014) explores the link between sovereign rating changes and bank stock returns. They show large negative reactions of stock returns in response to sovereign ratings downgrades for banks that are expected to receive government support in case of failure. They find the strongest effects in developed economies, where the credibility of government bail outs is higher ex ante, while the effects are smaller in developing and emerging economies. In my view, the paper makes a number of important contributions to the extant literature.
Read article
Competition and Contestability in Bank Retail Markets
Reint E. Gropp, Christoffer Kok
Handbook of Competition in Banking and Finance,
2017
Abstract
We examine the role of internet banking in retail-banking competition. The empirical analysis focuses on European banks for the period 2012-15. Building on the idea of contestable markets, we show that internet banking has increased competition through the contestability of markets. The effect is stronger for retail deposits, but recently consumer loans also show an effect. We attribute this finding to the advent of fintechs. These outcomes support the use of non-concentration-based competition measures in banking research.
Read article