Heimpold (Interview)
What South Korea has to do with the IWH ... Gerhard Heimpold about his experiences...
See page
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice (IWH-CEP) ...
See page
Brown Bag Seminar
Brown Bag Seminar Financial Markets Department The seminar series "Brown...
See page
IWH Research Network in Economics
IWH Research Network in Economics (IWH-ReNEc) The Halle Institute for Economic...
See page
Research Clusters
Three Research Clusters ...
See page
Teaching
Teaching Within the framework of its cooperations with both German and foreign...
See page
IWH EXplore
IWH EXplore Competitive Funding for Research Projects with External Involvement at...
See page
Standards
Achieving Scientific Quality and Meeting Social Standards In order to secure the...
See page
The German Model of Industrial Relations: Balancing Flexibility and Collective Action
Simon Jäger, Shakked Noy, Benjamin Schoefer
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
No. 4,
2022
Abstract
We give an overview of the "German model" of industrial relations. We organize our review by focusing on the two pillars of the model: sectoral collective bargaining and firm-level codetermination. Relative to the United States, Germany outsources collective bargaining to the sectoral level, resulting in higher coverage and the avoidance of firm-level distributional conflict. Relative to other European countries, Germany makes it easy for employers to avoid coverage or use flexibility provisions to deviate downwards from collective agreements. The greater flexibility of the German system may reduce unemployment, but may also erode bargaining coverage and increase inequality. Meanwhile, firm-level codetermination through worker board representation and works councils creates cooperative dialogue between employers and workers. Board representation has few direct impacts owing to worker representatives' minority vote share, but works councils, which hold a range of substantive powers, may be more impactful. Overall, the German model highlights tensions between efficiency-enhancing flexibility and equity-enhancing collective action.
Read article