The East-West entrepreneurial gap – a crucial economic problem in East Germany?
Gerhard Heimpold
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2001
Abstract
The ratio of business units per inhabitant is one of the most important factors that determine the development of economies and regions, because it has a strong impact on competition, employment and innovation. In East Germany, where the process of catching up has decelerated since the mid-nineties, the findings on this topic are ambivalent: on the one hand, half a million self-employed persons are counted and a similar number of companies are registered by the regional Chambers of Industry and Commerce. Furthermore, about 157.000 companies engaged in handicraft exist. These figures can be regarded as a success compared to the beginning of the nineties at the outset of systemic transformation. On the other hand, a striking entrepreneurial gap in East Germany still exists compared to the situation in the western part. It seems that this gap will not be closed in the near future, even on the contrary: the number of newly registered business units in East Germany has declined. Against this background, the promotion of entrepreneurship will remain a great challenge on the political agenda.
Read article
Productivity gap of East German industry: A summarizing evaluation
Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2001
Abstract
Ten years after German unification labor productivity in the New Laender reaches only 70 per cent of West German levels. Further, in the second half of the 1990ies, convergence did not continue. Because productivity can be regarded as a key for wages, for competitiveness of firms and for future transfer payments, the reasons for low productivity in East Germany are of major importance. In this article, it is argued that the existing productivity gap reflects mainly structural differences between East and West Germany, that is the high share of small firms and the predominance of sectors with low value added per worker. Additionally, difficulties on product markets leading to insufficient selling prices are responsible for the comparative low productivity of East German firms. Differences in capital intensity or in human capital, however, do explain only a small part of the productivity gap.
Read article
Differences in productivity and convergence of economic regions – The example of the New Länder -
Gerald Müller, Joachim Ragnitz, Anita Wölfl
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 3,
2001
Abstract
Auch im Jahre 2000 liegt das Produktivitätsniveau, das im Durchschnitt der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft erreicht wird, bei nur etwa zwei Dritteln des westdeutschen Wertes. Zwar gibt es eine erhebliche Differenzierung nach Unternehmen, nach Branchen und nach Regionen. Im Ganzen stellen die neuen Länder aber noch immer eine strukturschwache Region dar, und es ist offenkundig, dass das Ziel einer Angleichung der Pro-Kopf-Einkommen an das Westniveau kurzfristig nicht erreicht werden kann.
Die Frage, weshalb das Produktivitätsniveau in der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft weiterhin deutlich niedriger liegt als in Westdeutschland, ist auch 10 Jahre nach der deutschen Vereinigung noch nicht abschließend geklärt. In der Literatur gibt es zwar inzwischen eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlich gut begründeter Hypothesen, mit denen der Produktivitätsrückstand auf verschiedene betriebsinterne und -externe Faktoren zurückgeführt werden soll. Eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung fehlt aber bislang noch. Auch die Frage, welche Schlussfolgerungen angesichts des anhaltend niedrigen Produktivitätsniveaus für den weiteren Konvergenzprozess zu ziehen sind, ist noch nicht überzeugend beantwortet.
Angesichts dieser Forschungsdefizite hat das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie mit Schreiben vom 29. April 1998 das Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle beauftragt, im Rahmen der sektoralen Strukturberichterstattung das Thema „Produktivitätsunterschiede und Konvergenz von Wirtschaftsräumen – Das Beispiel der neuen Länder“ zu bearbeiten. Das IWH legt hiermit den Abschlussbericht zu diesem Projekt vor.
Read article
Methodical limits of calculating productivity in the new Länder
Gerald Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 129,
2000
Abstract
The „Arbeitskreis Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung der Länder“ now publishes figures concerning the value added in Germany. Formerly the Statistische Bundesamt had this assignment. Some corporations have plant locations in the new Länder as well as in the old Länder. The employed method for splitting-up the value added produce by these corporations might lead to an underestimation of the overall value added produced in the new Länder. However, an estimation using the firm panel of the IAB shows that the East German productivity gap for manufacturing is overestimated by maximally two percentage points. Still in sectors that are dominated by multi plant corporations this effect is stronger. All in all the East German productivity gab is overestimated by maximally three percentage points.
Read article
Structural change, specialization patterns, and the productivity gap between Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union
Johannes Stephan
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 13,
2000
Abstract
The transition countries of Central East Europe exhibit significantly lower productivity levels than that of the average of the 15 European Union countries. Since the outset of transition, however, this gap has clearly narrowed.
Next to technological and organisational factors it is sectoral structures which play an important role for the development and level of national productivities: in most transition economies, structural change clearly contributed positively to productivity growth. Poland is an exception here, no significant effect of structural change between sectors and industrial branches on the growth of the national productivity level could be found. The low intensity of structural adjustment in Poland in particular in the agricultural sector corresponds with a decisive role played by the sectoral pattern of specialisation within the European division of labour as determinant of the productivity gap. Hungary and to some degree also Slovenia, the country with the lowest productivity gap, exhibit similar results. Only in the cases of the Czech Republic and Slovakia remain negligible the explanatory powers of respective patterns of specialisation as productivity determinants.
Read article
Human capital in transformation – The example of the new Länder
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 126,
2000
Abstract
The human capital of a nation is highly correlated to its productivity. Thus, differences in human capital may be seen as one factor determining the productivity gap between East and West Germany. However, a disadvantage of East Germany with regard to hu-man capital only shows up as long as it concerns skills that are built up on the job, i.e., by learning by doing; even more, this disadvantage has been decreasing in the 1990's. In contrast, as long as it concerns skills that have been acquired through formal education, East Germany has a high level of human capital in comparison to West Germany. In general, the problem of East Germany’s human capital proves to be rather demand-sided. It may be due to East Germany’s low skill-intensive industry structure.
Read article
Capital equipment of East German work stations: Do not overstate gaps
Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2000
Abstract
New jobs depend heavily on productive investment. As nearly 800 bio DM were invested in the East German enterprise sector since 1990, most existing jobs can be regarded potentially competitive now. However, capital intensity is still much lower than in West Germany and reaches a level of only 75 per cent. In manufacturing, however, capital intensity is only slightly lower than in the old Laender.
There are mainly two reasons for the low capital intensity in the aggregate: The dominance of small firms producing regularly with a small capital stock per employee, and lower wages in East Germany compared with West Germany: Although capital prices are distorted by high subsidies, factor price relations favour labor to capital. This leads to the conclusion that low capital intensity reflects an optimum; convergence is therefore not necessarily to occur.
Read article
EU integration and development - Prospects of CEECs - The productivity-gap and technological structural change
Johannes Stephan
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 112,
2000
Abstract
Read article
Smaller productivity gap between German regions with different producer prices taken into account
Gerald Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 89,
1999
Abstract
Der Vergleich von 300 Erzeugerpreisen zeigt, dass vergleichbare Produkte in Ostdeutschland etwa 20 Prozent preiswerter sind als in Westdeutschland. Durch die Verwendung von Regressionsschätzungen lässt sich ein Konfidenzintervall für diesen Wert berechnen. Weitere Rechnungen mit Hilfe von Input-Output-Tabellen zeigen, dass auf gesamtwirtschaftlicher Ebene rechnerisch etwa zehn Prozentpunkte der Produktivitätslücke auf die niedrigeren Erzeugerpreise zurückzuführen sind.
Read article
Smaller productivity gap considering price effects
Gerald Müller
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
1998
Abstract
In dem Beitrag wird die These aufgestellt, dass niedrigere Erzeugerpreise in den neuen Bundesländern einen beachtlichen Teil des ostdeutschen Produktivitätsrückstands erklären. Der Vergleich von 300 Erzeugerpreisen sowie die Abschätzung der Auswirkung dieses Effekts auf einzelne Wirtschaftsbereiche mit Hilfe von Input-Output-Tabellen zeigt, dass auf gesamtwirtschaftlicher Ebene rechnerisch etwa zehn Prozentpunkte der Produktivitätslücke auf die niedrigeren Erzeugerpreise zurückzuführen sind. Für das Verarbeitende Gewerbe allein sind es nach dieser Untersuchung sogar 25 Prozentpunkte.
Read article