Competition Policy in Central East Europe in light of EU Accession
Johannes Stephan
Journal of Common Market Studies,
2004
Abstract
This study reviews the progress made in EU accession candidates on competition policy. The analysis shows that institution-building and legislation are well under way and that anti-trust practice is not too lax. Due to the diversity among the accession countries under review, the study finds that the strictly rule-based frame work of the EU might not be the most favourable solution for some candidates: firstly, the small and open economies of most candidates make it particularly difficult to define the ‘relevant market’ in competition cases. Secondly, the traditionally intense vertical integration of production in accession states calls for a reassessment of ‘vertical restraints’. The policy implications of this study suggest that the EU competition task force should take a proactive, case-by-case approach vis-à-vis its new members.
Read article
Current economic situation: German economy toils to break free from stagnation
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2004
Abstract
Die Weltwirtschaft expandiert gegenwärtig kräftig, und der Welthandel verzeichnet hohe Zuwachsraten. Der Aufwärtstrend an den wichtigsten Aktienmärkten scheint auch Anfang 2004 anzuhalten. Das weiterhin recht niedrige Niveau der Kapitalmarktzinsen signalisiert, dass die Finanzmärkte Inflationsrisiken in nächster Zeit für gering halten, nicht zuletzt, weil die weltweite Stagnationsphase in erheblichem Umfang freie Kapazitäten hinterlassen hat. Die Ursachen für den konjunkturellen Aufschwung sind verschiedenartig: Das politische Umfeld hat sich stabilisiert, die Zentralbanken in den USA, im Euroraum und in Japan sind auf unverändert expansivem Kurs, und Finanzkrisen größeren Ausmaßes hat es in letzter Zeit nicht gegeben. Günstige Finanzierungsbedingungen konnten so weltweit zu einer Belebung der Investitionstätigkeit führen. Die Weltkonjunktur wird gegenwärtig auch von den dynamischen Wachstumsprozessen Chinas und – in geringerem Ausmaß – anderer asiatischer und mittelosteuropäischer Länder geprägt. Die steigende Nachfrage aus den Schwellenländern erklärt zum großen Teil das Anziehen von Preisen für Rohöl und Industrierohstoffe seit Mitte letzten Jahres.
Read article
Current Trends - IWH barometer for economic activity - East German economy had a good start in the new year
Udo Ludwig
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 3,
2004
Abstract
Im vergangenen Jahr hat sich die wirtschaftliche Aktivität in den neuen Bundesländern geringfügig stärker erhöht als zuletzt laut IWH-Konjunkturbarometer vorausgesagt worden. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt stieg laut erster amtlicher Schätzung im Jahresdurchschnitt um 0,4%, wohingegen es in den alten Ländern um 0,2% schrumpfte. Zugleich hat der Arbeitskreis VGR der Länder neue Berechnungen für die Jahre 1999 bis 2002 vorgelegt.
Read article
Investment, Financial Markets, New Economy Dynamics and Growth in Transition Countries
Albrecht Kauffmann, P. J. J. Welfens
Economic Opening Up and Growth in Russia: Finance, Trade, Market Institutions, and Energy,
2004
Abstract
The transition to a market economy in the former CMEA area is more than a decade old and one can clearly distinguish a group of relatively fast growing countries — including Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia — and a majority of slowly growing economies, including Russia and the Ukraine. Initial problems of transition were natural in the sense that systemic transition to a market economy has effectively destroyed part of the existing capital stock that was no longer profitable under the new relative prices imported from world markets; and there was a transitory inflationary push as low state-administered prices were replaced by higher market equilibrium prices. Indeed, systemic transformation in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union have brought serious transitory inflation problems and a massive transition recession; negative growth rates have continued over many years in some countries, including Russia and the Ukraine, where output growth was negative throughout the 1990s (except for Russia, which recorded slight growth in 1997). For political and economic reasons the economic performance of Russia is of particular relevance for the success of the overall transition process. If Russia would face stagnation and instability, this would undermine political and economic stability in the whole of Europe and prospects for integrating Russia into the world economy.
Read article
Current Trends - East German economy slowly emerges from stagnation
Udo Ludwig
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 16,
2003
Abstract
Die gesamtwirtschaftliche Aktivität in Ostdeutschland hat laut dem Konjunkturbarometer des IWH die Schwäche vom Sommerhalbjahr überwunden und nimmt im Schlussquartal wieder zu. Im Vergleich zu 2002 insgesamt bedeutet dies einen Zuwachs des Bruttoinlandsprodukts in diesem Jahr von 0,3%. Quelle dieser Ergebnisse ist die Vierteljahresrechnung des IWH für die Entstehung des Bruttoinlandsprodukts in den neuen Bundesländern, die an die Halbjahresentwicklung laut der amtlichen VGR der Länder angepasst und anhand aktueller sektoraler Indikatoren für die beiden letzten Quartale des Jahres 2003 geschätzt wurde.
Read article
The IWH barometer for economic activity in East Germany
Udo Ludwig
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 16,
2003
Abstract
The article discusses the reasons for calculating quarterly GDP by the production method for East Germany. Furthermore the methods for this calculation as well as the results for 2003 are being presented.
Read article
Position and perspectives of Saxony-Anhalt in the New Economy
Martin T. W. Rosenfeld, Joachim Ragnitz, Rupert Kawka, Walter Komar
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 6,
2003
Abstract
Der technische Fortschritt zählt zu den zentralen Determinanten des wirtschaftlichen Wachstums. Regionen, in denen viel Forschung und Entwicklung betrieben wird, haben daher eine bessere Ausgangsposition im Standortwettbewerb als solche, wo dies in nur geringerem Maß geschieht. Eine besondere Hoffnung gilt dabei den Hochtechnologiebranchen und nicht zuletzt dem hier untersuchten Informations- und Kommunikationssektor sowie dem Biotechnologiesektor. Diese beiden Bereiche bilden einen wesentlichen Teilbestand der so genannten New Economy. Die Vergangenheit hat gezeigt, dass die New Economy nicht von Krisen verschont bleibt, und so ist ein realistischeres Bild von den Chancen, die diese Hochtechnologien bieten können, entstanden. Dennoch besteht die berechtigte Hoffnung, dass die beiden genannten Branchen weiterhin einen weitreichenden Einfluss auch auf andere Wirtschaftssektoren ausüben, indem sie so genannte Schlüssel- oder Querschnittstechnologien entwickeln und anbieten.
Read article
Firm-Specific Determinants of Productivity Gaps between East and West German Industrial Branches
Johannes Stephan, Karin Szalai
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 183,
2003
Abstract
Industrial productivity levels of formerly socialist economies in Central East Europe (including East Germany) are considerably lower than in the more mature Western economies. This research aims at assessing the reasons for lower productivities at the firm level: what are the firm-specific determinants of productivity gaps. To assess this, we have conducted an extensive field study and focussed on a selection of two important manufacturing industries, namely machinery manufacturers and furniture manufacturers, and on the construction industry. Using the data generated in field work, we test a set of determinant-candidates which were derived from theory and prior research in that topic. Our analysis uses the simplest version of the matched-pair approach, in which first hypothesis about relevant productivity level-determinants are tested. In a second step, positively tested hypothesis are further assessed in terms of whether they also constitute firm-specific determinants of the apparent gaps between the firms in our Eastern and such in our Western panels. Our results suggest that the quality of human capital plays an important role in all three industrial branches assessed. Amongst manufacturing firms, networking activities and the use of modern technologies for communication are important reasons for the lower levels of labour productivity in the East. The intensity of long-term strategic planning on behalf of the management turned out to be relevant only for machinery manufacturers. Product and process innovations unexpectedly exhibit an ambiguous picture, as did the extent of specialisation on a small number of products in the firms’ portfolio and the intensity of competition.
Read article
EU Accession Countries’ Specialisation Patterns in Foreign Trade and Domestic Production - What can we infer for catch-up prospects?
Johannes Stephan
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 184,
2003
Abstract
This paper supplements prior analysis on ‘patterns and prospects’ (Stephan, 2003) in which prospects for the speed of future productivity growth were assessed by looking at the specialisation patterns in domestic production. This analysis adds the foreign trade sphere to the results generated in the prior analysis. The refined results are broadly in line with the results from the original analysis, indicating the robustness of our methods applied in either analysis. The most prominent results pertain to Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. Those two countries appear to be best suited for swift productivity catch-up from the viewpoint of sectoral specialisation. Poland and Estonia exhibit the lowest potentials. Only for the case of Poland would results suggest bleak prospects.
Read article
Evolving Structural Patterns in the Enlarging European Division of Labour: Sectoral and Branch Specialisation and the Potentials for Closing the Productivity Gap
Johannes Stephan
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 5,
2003
Abstract
This report summarises the results generated in empirical analysis within a larger EU 5th FP RTD-project on the determinants of productivity gaps between the current EU-15 and accession states in Central East Europe. The focus of research in this part of the project is on sectoral specialisation patterns emerging as a result of intensifying integration between the current EU and a selection of six newly acceding economies, namely Estonia, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary and Slovenia. The research-leading question is concerned with the role played by the respective specialisation patterns for (i) the explanation of observed productivity gaps and for (ii) the projection of future potentials of productivity growth in Central East Europe.
For the aggregated level, analysis determines the share of national productivity gaps accountable to acceding countries’ particular sectoral patterns, and their role for aggregate productivity growth: in Poland, the Slovak Republic and Hungary, sectoral shares of national productivity gaps are considerable and might evolve into a ‘barrier’ to productivity catch-up.Moreover, past productivity growth was dominated by a downward adjustment in employment rather than structural change. With the industrial sector of manufacturing having been identified as the main source of national productivity gaps and growth, the subsequent analysis focuses on the role of industrial specialisation patterns and develops an empirical model to project future productivity growth potentials. Each chapter closes with some policy conclusions.
Read article