Ostdeutsche Wirtschaft im Jahr 2012: Im Sog der allgemeinen Abkühlung der Konjunktur
Udo Ludwig, Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Brigitte Loose, Franziska Exß
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 8,
2012
Abstract
Nach dem Ende der Nachholphase der Produktionsausfälle in der globalen Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise ist die ostdeutsche Wirtschaft in schwieriges Fahrwasser geraten. Ähnlich wie damals verliert in der Realwirtschaft infolge der erneut gestiegenen Unsicherheiten auf den Außenmärkten und der konjunkturellen Abschwächung in Deutschland zuerst die Industrie ihre Antriebskraft. Das Baugewerbe profitiert nur wenig von der Flucht in Immobilien. Wie lange diese Entwicklung anhält, hängt von der Entschärfung der Staatsschulden- und Vertrauenskrisen im Euroraum ab.
Ein Teil der Eintrübung wird kompensiert durch die steigende Nachfrage der privaten Haushalte nach Konsumgütern und Wohnungen. Dämpfend wirken dabei allerdings die Ausrichtung der Produktion in Ostdeutschland auf Standardprodukte und auf Regionen in Westeuropa sowie der demographische Faktor. Der Aufschwung am Arbeitsmarkt läuft im Jahr 2012 aus. Der nachfragebedingte Produktionsrückgang wird nicht durch die gestiegene Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Unternehmen auf der Kostenseite ausgeglichen. So besteht in der gewerblichen Wirtschaft insgesamt nur ein minimaler Wettbewerbsvorsprung der ost- gegenüber den westdeutschen Anbietern.
Gemäß dieser Prognose wächst das Bruttoinlandsprodukt der ostdeutschen Flächenländer auch in diesem Jahr langsamer als in Westdeutschland. Der wirtschaftliche Aufholprozess stagniert pro Einwohner. Der Abstand in der Arbeitsproduktivität verringert sich leicht.
Read article
Im Lichte neuer Daten: Ostdeutschland liegt ökonomisch weiter zurück als vermutet
Udo Ludwig, Brigitte Loose, Franziska Exß
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2012
Abstract
Die von der amtlichen Statistik kürzlich vorgelegte Revision der bisherigen Angaben zum Bruttoinlandsprodukt, der Wertschöpfung und der Beschäftigung betrifft die Wirtschaftsbereiche, Bundesländer und Großräume in höchst unterschiedlichem Maße. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt der ostdeutschen Bundesländer war über-, das eingesetzte Arbeitsvolumen dagegen unterschätzt worden. So geriet die Produktivitätsmessung in den Zangengriff von Produktionskürzung und gestiegenem Arbeitseinsatz. Im Vergleich zum Westen fällt die Korrektur bei der
Produktivität je Stunde höher aus als bei der Produktion je Einwohner. Der Osten erreichte im Vorkrisenjahr 2008 beim Bruttoinlandsprodukt je Einwohner nur 66% des Westniveaus statt der bisher gehandelten 69% und bei der Produktivität je Arbeitsstunde 70% statt 75%. Bezogen auf das Bruttoinlandsprodukt ist zusammen mit dem Produktionsausfall durch die Wirtschaftskrise ein Rückschlag
im Aufholprozess von mindestens fünf Jahren eingetreten. Dies hat Implikationen für Politik und Forschung.
Read article
An Economic Life in Vain − Path Dependence and East Germany’s Pre- and Post-Unification Economic Stagnation
Ulrich Blum
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 10,
2011
Abstract
20 years after unification, the East German twin’s economic position is relatively stagnant compared to most of the West German productivity and income variables. The strong initial takeoff until the mid-end 1990s ended at a level of 70% to 80% of the western reference. In this paper, two interdependent hypotheses are put to the test: (i) that the communist economy prior to unification was on a stagnating path contrary to what standard analyses show; (ii) that strong elements of path dependence exist and that the switch from plan to market offset the pre-unification stagnation but was not able to repair structural deficits inherited from the past. In fact, looking into West German long-term data, an extremely stable development path can be found that extends from the 19th century to the present. Thus, the analysis of the East German development path is both economically relevant and politically interesting if economic policies are to be formulated.
Read article
Is East Germany Catching Up? A Time Series Perspective
Bernd Aumann, Rolf Scheufele
Post-Communist Economies,
2010
Abstract
This article assesses whether the economy of East Germany is catching up with the West German region in terms of welfare. While the primary measure for convergence and catching up is per capita output, we also look at other macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rates, wage rates and production levels in the manufacturing sector. In contrast to existing studies of convergence between regions of the reunified Germany, our approach is based purely upon the time series dimension and is thus directly focused on the catching up process in East Germany as a region. Our testing set-up includes standard ADF unit root tests as well as unit root tests that endogenously allow for a break in the deterministic component of the process. We find evidence of catching up for East Germany for most of the indicators. However, the convergence speed is slow, and thus it can be expected that the catching up process will take further decades until the regional gap is closed.
Read article
Challenges for Future Regional Policy in East Germany. Does East Germany really show Characteristics of Mezzogiorno?
Mirko Titze
A. Kuklinski; E. Malak-Petlicka; P. Zuber (eds), Souther Italy – Eastern Germany – Eastern Poland. The Triple Mezzogiorno? Ministry of Regional Development,
2010
Abstract
Despite extensive government support the gap between East and West Germany has still not been successfully closed nearly 20 years post German unification. Hence, some economists tend to compare East Germany with Mezzogiorno – underdeveloped Southern Italy. East Germany is still subject to sever structural problems in comparison to West Germany: lower per capita income, lower productivity, higher unemployment rates, fewer firm headquarters and fewer innovation activities. There are East German regions with less than desirable rates of development. Nevertheless, the new federal states have shown some evidence of a convergence process. Some regions have developed very positively – they have improved their competitiveness and employment levels. As such, the comparison of East Germany with Mezzogiorno does not seem applicable today.
According to Neoclassical Growth Theory, regional policy is targeted enhancing investment (hereafter the notion ‘investment policy’ is used). has been the most important instrument in forcing the ‘reconstruction of the East’. Overall, the investment policy is seen as having been successful. It is not, however, the only factor influencing regional development – political policy makers noted in the mid 1990s that research and development (R&D) activities and regional concentrated production networks, amongst other factors, may also play a part. The investment policy instrument has therefore been adjusted. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that investment policy may fail in particular cases because it contains potentially conflicting targets. A ‘better road’ for future regional policy may lie in the support of regional production and innovation networks – the so-called industrial clusters. These clusters would need to be exactingly identified however to ensure effective and efficient cluster policies.
Read article
Do All Countries Grow Alike?
Claire Economidou, J. W. B. Bos, Michael Koetter, James W. Kolari
Journal of Development Economics,
No. 1,
2010
Abstract
This paper investigates the driving forces of output change in 77 countries during the period 1970–2000. A flexible modeling strategy is adopted that accounts for (i) the inefficient use of resources, and (ii) different production technologies across countries. The proposed model can identify technical, efficiency, and input change for each of three endogenously determined regimes. Membership in these regimes is estimated, rather than determined ex ante. This framework enables explorations into the determinants of output growth and convergence issues in each regime.
Read article
Is East Germany Catching Up? A Time Series Perspective
Bernd Aumann, Rolf Scheufele
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 14,
2009
Abstract
This paper assesses whether the economy of East Germany is catching up with the
West German region in terms of welfare. While the primary measure for convergence and catching up is per capita output, we also look at other macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rates, wage rates, and production levels in the manufacturingsector. In contrast to existing studies of convergence between regions of reunified Germany, our approach is purely based upon the time series dimension and is thus directly focused on the catching up process in East Germany as a region. Our testing setup includes standard ADF unit root tests as well as unit root tests that endogenously allow for a break in the deterministic component of the process. In our analysis, we find evidence of catching up for East Germany for most of the indicators. However, convergence speed is slow, and thus it can be expected that the catching up process will take further decades until the regional gap is closed.
Read article
Race to the Market: Can Standards Survive the Acceleration of Innovation and Product Life Cycles?
Ulrich Blum
Spatial Dispersed Production and Network Governance, Papers Presented at the 11th Uddevalla Symposium, 15 – 17. May 2008, Kyoto, Research Report 2008,
2008
Abstract
Plagiarism of emerging market countries has for a considerable time been seen as the main challenge to the western approach of codifying and securing intellectual property rights (IPRs). This neglects the fact that historically all countries which tried to converge to the level of successful economies copied technology. The discussion shadows our view that the more imminent question is whether the steady increase in competition intensity which shortens product life cycles and puts pressure on the invention and innovation system, provides enough time to patent and to standardize. As patent activity not only provides incentives for sinking costs into R&D but is also a first step in the dissemination of technologies, and as standards, especially formal standards, generate level playing fields in broad and reliable markets, this may be critical in the long run. Furthermore, the migration of technologies as a result of a steady reorganization of the spatial division of labor may lead to the adverse situation that countries harboring technologies do not have appropriate institutions for knowledge codification.
Exogenous factors that – at least in the short run – cannot be influenced by the standardization bodies are the level of cooperation among interested parties (and mutual trust and institutional linkage), the competitiveness of the technology, the ability to generate externalities by knowledge codification, and the productivity of the technologies. The most important single success factor that standardization bodies can influence is the speed with which a committee proceeds to timely publish formal standards. With reference to a game-theoretical model and based on data for 1997 and 2007 on published formal standards, we show that until now, standardization bodies seem to have successfully coped with the situation.
Read article
Humankapital und Produktivität in Ostdeutschland
Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 6,
2007
Abstract
The paper shows that East Germany has a significant lower endowment with human capital compared to West Germany when actual professional activities are taken into account. This is by equal means due to a smaller share of human capital intensive industries and a lower human capital intensity in most industries. As a consequence, people with higher qualifications face severe difficulties to find a job in East Germany. This again is one reason for migration flows to West Germany, leading to a still worsening human capital endowment in the new Laender. It can be shown that lower human capital intensity is one reason for the still existing human capital gap between East and West Germany. Convergence prospects are therefore not as good as often supposed.
Read article
Can EU Policy Intervention Help Productivity Catch-Up?
Johannes Stephan, P. Holmes, J. Lopez-Gonzales, C. Stolberg
Closing the EU East-West Productivity Gap - Foreign direct Investment, Competitiveness, and Public Policy,
2006
Abstract
"A product of the Framework V research project, this book addresses one of the key problems facing the EU today: Why is the ‘new’ EU so much poorer than the ‘old’, and how will EU enlargement help to solve the problem? Focusing on the productivity problems underlying the East-West gap, it looks in particular at the role that foreign investment and R&D can play in closing it. Against that background, the book assesses what role proactive development policy might play in attacking the roots of low social productivity. Concluding that there will be a clear-cut process of convergence between East and West, albeit an incomplete one, it finishes with an assessment of the patterns of competitiveness, East and West, that are likely to emerge from this process of incomplete convergence."
Read article