Im Jahr 2020 zieht die Weltwirtschaft wieder etwas an, weil der Gegenwind von den Handelskonflikten nachlässt. Die jüngsten Produktionsdaten deuten allerdings noch nicht auf eine durchgreifende Besserung der internationalen Konjunktur hin. Auch wegen der niedrigen Preisdynamik ist die Geldpolitik im Lauf des Jahres vielerorts noch einmal expansiver geworden. Wenn weitere Zollerhebungen im Wesentlichen ausbleiben, dürfte der Abschwung im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe um die Jahreswende 2019/2020 zu Ende gehen. Allerdings bleibt die Zukunft der politischen Rahmenbedingungen für den internationalen Handel unsicher. Das ist ein wichtiger Grund, warum mit einem kräftigen weltwirtschaftlichen Aufschwung für den Prognosezeitraum nicht zu rechnen ist. Zudem dürfte die Expansion der Nachfrage aus China weiter nachlassen.

Die deutsche Wirtschaft befindet sich weiter im Abschwung. Ursache ist im Wesentlichen die schwache Auslandsnachfrage nach Produkten des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes, bedingt durch die von den USA ausgehenden protektionistischen Tendenzen und den bevorstehenden Brexit. Als weiterer Faktor kommen die Probleme im Automobilbau hinzu, denn die Branche steht mit am Beginn eines drastischen Strukturwandels. Im Jahr 2020 dürfte eine leichte Belebung der internationalen Konjunktur den deutschen Export wieder anziehen lassen. Der Anstieg wird aber nicht allzu hoch ausfallen, nicht zuletzt, weil die Lohnstückkosten seit einiger Zeit deutlich zugenommen haben. Auf der anderen Seite stabilisieren die recht deutlichen Lohnzuwächse die binnenwirtschaftliche Nachfrage. Zudem wirkt die Finanzpolitik expansiv, und die günstigen Finanzierungsbedingungen werden zusammen mit der Wohnungsknappheit in Ballungsräumen den Bauboom am Leben halten. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt wird im Jahr 2020 wohl um 1,1% zunehmen, auch dank einer hohen Zahl an Arbeitstagen. Der Produktionszuwachs in Ostdeutschland dürfte mit 1,3% höher ausfallen als in Gesamtdeutschland. Die Verbraucherpreisinflation bleibt moderat, die Beschäftigung nimmt nur noch wenig zu.

We examine how management ability affects the extent to which capital markets rely on earnings to value equity. Using a measure of ability that captures a management team’s capacity for generating revenues with a given level of resources compared to other industry peers, we find a strong positive association between managerial ability and the value relevance of earnings. Additional tests show that our results are robust to controlling for earnings attributes and investment efficiency. We use propensity score matching and the 2SLS instrumental variable approach to deal with the issue of endogeneity. For further identification, we examine CEO turnover and find that newly hired CEOs with better managerial abilities than the replaced CEOs increase the value relevance of earnings. We identify weak corporate governance and product market power as the two important channels through which superior management practices play an important role in the corporate decision-making process that positively influence the value relevance of earnings. Overall, our findings suggest that better managers make accounting information significantly more relevant in the market valuation of equity.

I study how cross-country capital market integration affects the gains from trade in a model with financial frictions and heterogeneous, forward-looking firms. The model predicts that misallocation among exporters increases as trade barriers fall, even as misallocation decreases in the aggregate. The reason is that financially constrained productive exporters increase their production only marginally, while unproductive exporters survive for longer and increase their size. Allowing capital inflows magnifies misallocation, because unproductive firms expand even more, leading to a decline in aggregate productivity. Nevertheless, under integrated capital markets, access to cheaper capital dominates the adverse effect on productivity, leading to higher output, consumption and welfare than under closed capital markets. Applied to the period of European integration between 1992 and 2008, I find that underdeveloped sectors experiencing higher export exposure had more misallocation of capital and a higher share of unproductive firms, thus the data is consistent with the model’s predictions. A key implication of the model is that TFP is a poor proxy for consumption growth after trade liberalisation.

Does finance facilitate efficient allocation of resources? Our aim in this paper is to find out whether increases in private and public indebtedness affect capital misallocation, which is measured as the dispersion in the return to capital across firms in different industries. For this, we use a novel dataset containing industrylevel data for 18 European countries and control for different macroeconomic indicators as potential determinants of capital misallocation. We exploit the within-country variation across industries in such indicators as external finance dependence, technological intensity, credit constraints and competitive structure, and find that private debt accumulation disproportionately increases capital misallocation in industries with higher financial dependence, higher R&D intensity, a larger share of credit-constrained firms and a lower level of competition. On the other hand, we fail to find any significant and robust effect of public debt on capital misallocation within our country-sector pairs. We believe the distortionary effects of private debt found in our analysis needs a deeper theoretical investigation.

In this paper we analyse how the terms of trade (TOT) – the ratio of export prices to import prices – affect total factor productivity (TFP). We provide empirical macroeconomic evidence for the European Union countries based on the times series SVAR analysis and microeconomic evidence based on industry level data from the Competitiveness Research Network (CompNet) database which shows that the terms of trade improvements are associated with a slowdown in the total factor productivity growth. Next, we build a theoretical model which combines open economy framework with the endogenous growth theory. In the model the terms of trade improvements increase demand for labour employed in exportable goods production at the expense of technology production (research and development – R&D) which leads to a shift of resources from knowledge development towards physical exportable goods. This reallocation has a negative impact on the TFP growth. Under a plausible calibration the model is able to replicate the observed empirical pattern.

n modern finance, financial decision making of households plays an important role. At least the recent global financial crisis recalled the role of the household sector in financial stability. Besides the debate how, for example, the introduction of financial sector regulations and reforms can enhance the stability of financial systems and prevent future crises, research focuses on how household behavior contributes to financial stability and the performance of the economy. By allocating their re- sources, e.g., making decisions about labor supply, consumption, savings, and debt, households directly affect market production and prices and, thus, make a relevant contribution to financial stability. The exposure to the financial sector enables house- holds to influence the overall economy (Santoso and Sukada, 2009).

This study analyses empirically the effects of import competition on firm productivity (TFPQ) using administrative firm-level panel data from German manufacturing. We find that only import competition from high-income countries is associated with positive incentives for firms to invest in productivity improvement, whereas import competition from middle- and low-income countries is not. To rationalise these findings, we further look at the characteristics of imports from the two types of countries and the effects on R&D, employment and sales. We provide evidence that imports from high-income countries are relatively capital-intensive and technologically more sophisticated goods, at which German firms tend to be relatively good. Costly investment in productivity appears feasible reaction to such type of competition and we find no evidence for downscaling. Imports from middle- and low-wage countries are relatively labour-intensive and technologically less sophisticated goods, at which German firms tend to generally be at disadvantage. In this case, there are no incentives to invest in innovation and productivity and firms tend to decline in sales and employment.