Since the fall of the iron curtain in 1989, the migration deficit of the Eastern part of Germany has accumulated to 1.8 million people, which is over ten percent of its initial population. Depending on their human capital endowment, these migrants might either – in the case of low-skilled migration – accelerate or – in high-skilled case – impede convergence. Due to the availability of detailed data on regional human capital, migration and productivity growth, we are able to test how geographic mobility affects convergence via the human capital selectivity of migration. With regard to the endogeneity of the migration flows and human capital, we apply a dynamic panel data model within the framework of β-convergence and account for spatial dependence. The regressions indicate a positive, robust, but modest effect of a migration surplus on regional productivity growth. After controlling for human capital, the effect of migration decreases; this decrease indicates that skill selectivity is one way that migration impacts growth.

Since the fall of the iron curtain in 1989, the migration deficit of the Eastern part of Germany has accumulated to 1.8 million people, which is over 10 percent of its ini-tial population. Depending on their human capital endowment, these migrants might either – in the case of low-skilled migration – accelerate or – in high-skilled case– impede convergence. Due to the availability of detailed data on regional human capital, migration and productivity growth, we are able to test how geographic mobil-ity affects convergence via the human capital selectivity of migration. With regard to the endogeneity of the migration flows and human capital, we apply a dynamic panel data model within the framework of β-convergence and account for spatial depend-ence. The regressions indicate a positive, robust, but modest effect of a migration surplus on regional productivity growth. After controlling for human capital, the effect of migration decreases; this decrease indicates that skill selectivity is one way that migration impacts growth.

Nach dem Ende der Nachholphase der Produktionsausfälle in der globalen Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise ist die ostdeutsche Wirtschaft in schwieriges Fahrwasser geraten. Ähnlich wie damals verliert in der Realwirtschaft infolge der erneut gestiegenen Unsicherheiten auf den Außenmärkten und der konjunkturellen Abschwächung in Deutschland zuerst die Industrie ihre Antriebskraft. Das Baugewerbe profitiert nur wenig von der Flucht in Immobilien. Wie lange diese Entwicklung anhält, hängt von der Entschärfung der Staatsschulden- und Vertrauenskrisen im Euroraum ab.

Ein Teil der Eintrübung wird kompensiert durch die steigende Nachfrage der privaten Haushalte nach Konsumgütern und Wohnungen. Dämpfend wirken dabei allerdings die Ausrichtung der Produktion in Ostdeutschland auf Standardprodukte und auf Regionen in Westeuropa sowie der demographische Faktor. Der Aufschwung am Arbeitsmarkt läuft im Jahr 2012 aus. Der nachfragebedingte Produktionsrückgang wird nicht durch die gestiegene Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Unternehmen auf der Kostenseite ausgeglichen. So besteht in der gewerblichen Wirtschaft insgesamt nur ein minimaler Wettbewerbsvorsprung der ost- gegenüber den westdeutschen Anbietern.

Gemäß dieser Prognose wächst das Bruttoinlandsprodukt der ostdeutschen Flächenländer auch in diesem Jahr langsamer als in Westdeutschland. Der wirtschaftliche Aufholprozess stagniert pro Einwohner. Der Abstand in der Arbeitsproduktivität verringert sich leicht.

Die von der amtlichen Statistik kürzlich vorgelegte Revision der bisherigen Angaben zum Bruttoinlandsprodukt, der Wertschöpfung und der Beschäftigung betrifft die Wirtschaftsbereiche, Bundesländer und Großräume in höchst unterschiedlichem Maße. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt der ostdeutschen Bundesländer war über-, das eingesetzte Arbeitsvolumen dagegen unterschätzt worden. So geriet die Produktivitätsmessung in den Zangengriff von Produktionskürzung und gestiegenem Arbeitseinsatz. Im Vergleich zum Westen fällt die Korrektur bei der

Produktivität je Stunde höher aus als bei der Produktion je Einwohner. Der Osten erreichte im Vorkrisenjahr 2008 beim Bruttoinlandsprodukt je Einwohner nur 66% des Westniveaus statt der bisher gehandelten 69% und bei der Produktivität je Arbeitsstunde 70% statt 75%. Bezogen auf das Bruttoinlandsprodukt ist zusammen mit dem Produktionsausfall durch die Wirtschaftskrise ein Rückschlag

im Aufholprozess von mindestens fünf Jahren eingetreten. Dies hat Implikationen für Politik und Forschung.

20 Jahre nach dem Vollzug der Einheit stagniert die Wirtschaftsentwicklung des „ostdeutschen Zwillings“ im Vergleich zu westdeutschen Einkommens- und Produktionskennzahlen. Der starke Wachstumsschub bis in die Mitte der 1990er Jahre ebbte ab, und die Wirtschaft verharrt seitdem auf einem Niveau, das 70% bis 80% der westdeutschen Referenzgrößen entspricht. In diesem Beitrag werden zwei voneinander unabhängige Hypothesen überprüft: (i), dass bereits die kommunistische Wirtschaft Ostdeutschlands vor der Einheit auf einem Stagnationspfad war, ganz im Gegensatz zu dem, was andere Untersuchungen ausweisen; (ii), dass eine starke Pfadabhängigkeit existiert und der Umstieg von der Zentralverwaltungs- zur Marktwirtschaft nur diese vorangegangene Stagnationsphase kompensierte, die tiefer liegenden strukturellen Defizite aber nicht löste. Im Falle Westdeutschlands reicht ein stabiler Entwicklungspfad vom 19. Jahrhundert in die Gegenwart. Daher ist die Analyse des ostdeutschen Entwicklungspfads gleichzeitig ökonomisch relevant und wirtschaftspolitisch bedeutsam.

This article assesses whether the economy of East Germany is catching up with the West German region in terms of welfare. While the primary measure for convergence and catching up is per capita output, we also look at other macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rates, wage rates and production levels in the manufacturing sector. In contrast to existing studies of convergence between regions of the reunified Germany, our approach is based purely upon the time series dimension and is thus directly focused on the catching up process in East Germany as a region. Our testing set-up includes standard ADF unit root tests as well as unit root tests that endogenously allow for a break in the deterministic component of the process. We find evidence of catching up for East Germany for most of the indicators. However, the convergence speed is slow, and thus it can be expected that the catching up process will take further decades until the regional gap is closed.

Despite extensive government support the gap between East and West Germany has still not been successfully closed nearly 20 years post German unification. Hence, some economists tend to compare East Germany with Mezzogiorno – underdeveloped Southern Italy. East Germany is still subject to sever structural problems in comparison to West Germany: lower per capita income, lower productivity, higher unemployment rates, fewer firm headquarters and fewer innovation activities. There are East German regions with less than desirable rates of development. Nevertheless, the new federal states have shown some evidence of a convergence process. Some regions have developed very positively – they have improved their competitiveness and employment levels. As such, the comparison of East Germany with Mezzogiorno does not seem applicable today.

According to Neoclassical Growth Theory, regional policy is targeted enhancing investment (hereafter the notion ‘investment policy’ is used). has been the most important instrument in forcing the ‘reconstruction of the East’. Overall, the investment policy is seen as having been successful. It is not, however, the only factor influencing regional development – political policy makers noted in the mid 1990s that research and development (R&D) activities and regional concentrated production networks, amongst other factors, may also play a part. The investment policy instrument has therefore been adjusted. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that investment policy may fail in particular cases because it contains potentially conflicting targets. A ‘better road’ for future regional policy may lie in the support of regional production and innovation networks – the so-called industrial clusters. These clusters would need to be exactingly identified however to ensure effective and efficient cluster policies.

This paper investigates the driving forces of output change in 77 countries during the period 1970–2000. A flexible modeling strategy is adopted that accounts for (i) the inefficient use of resources, and (ii) different production technologies across countries. The proposed model can identify technical, efficiency, and input change for each of three endogenously determined regimes. Membership in these regimes is estimated, rather than determined ex ante. This framework enables explorations into the determinants of output growth and convergence issues in each regime.

This paper assesses whether the economy of East Germany is catching up with the

West German region in terms of welfare. While the primary measure for convergence and catching up is per capita output, we also look at other macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rates, wage rates, and production levels in the manufacturingsector. In contrast to existing studies of convergence between regions of reunified Germany, our approach is purely based upon the time series dimension and is thus directly focused on the catching up process in East Germany as a region. Our testing setup includes standard ADF unit root tests as well as unit root tests that endogenously allow for a break in the deterministic component of the process. In our analysis, we find evidence of catching up for East Germany for most of the indicators. However, convergence speed is slow, and thus it can be expected that the catching up process will take further decades until the regional gap is closed.

"A product of the Framework V research project, this book addresses one of the key problems facing the EU today: Why is the ‘new’ EU so much poorer than the ‘old’, and how will EU enlargement help to solve the problem? Focusing on the productivity problems underlying the East-West gap, it looks in particular at the role that foreign investment and R&D can play in closing it. Against that background, the book assesses what role proactive development policy might play in attacking the roots of low social productivity. Concluding that there will be a clear-cut process of convergence between East and West, albeit an incomplete one, it finishes with an assessment of the patterns of competitiveness, East and West, that are likely to emerge from this process of incomplete convergence."