This paper explores the impact of financial constraints on the internationalization

strategies of firms. It contributes to the literature by focusing on three aspects: First, the paper studies the impact of financial constraints on exporting relative to FDI. Consistent with theory, the empirical results confirm that the impact of financial constraints is stronger for FDI than for exporting. Second, the paper analyzes the extensive and the intensive margins and finds that financial frictions matter for both. Third, the paper explores the impact on manufacturing as compared to service industries and shows that firms in service industries are affected more than firms in manufacturing. The paper also identifies a threshold effect: Financial constraints do not matter for small firms whose productivity seems to be too low to consider international expansions.

Diese Studie untersucht den komparativen Vorteil multinationaler Banken gegenüber dem grenzüberschreitenden Handel mit Finanzdienstleistungen hinsichtlich der Fähigkeit, vom globalen Zugang zu Finanzierungsquellen zu profitieren. Es wird argumentiert, dass der komparative Vorteil durch Nutzen und Kosten einer besonderen Kenntnis lokaler Märkte bestimmt wird. Für multinationale Banken liegt der Nutzen darin, eine höhere Produktivität zu erreichen und mehr Liquidität bereit zu stellen. Die Kosten bestehen darin, dass bestehdne Interessenskonflikte nur aufgrund der Spezifität des Wissens auch zu Ineffizienzen auf den bankinternen Kapitalmärkten führen; diese sind aber erforderlich, um Liquidität grenzüberschreitend zu alloziieren. Es werden die Bedingungen analysiert, unter denen multinationale Banken einen komparativen Vorteil haben, und es wird gezeigt, dass Mindesteigenkapitalvorschriften einen Einfluss hierauf ausüben, da sie das Ausmaß der Ineffizienzen interner Kapitalmärkte für verschiedene Organisationsformen unterschiedlich beeinflussen.

We use a new bank-level dataset to study the FDI-versus-exports decision for German banks. We extend the literature on multinational firms in two directions. First, we simultaneously study FDI and the export of cross-border financial services. Second, we test recent theories on multinational firms which show the importance of firm heterogeneity [Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J., Yeaple, S.R., 2004. Export versus FDI. American Economic Review 94 (1), 300–316]. Our results show that FDI and cross-border services are complements rather than substitutes. Heterogeneity of banks has a significant impact on the internationalization decision. More profitable and larger banks are more likely to expand internationally than smaller banks. They have more extensive foreign activities, and they are more likely to engage in FDI in addition to cross-border financial services.

This paper studies how capital requirements influence a bank’s mode of entry into foreign financial markets. We develop a model of an internationally operating bank that creates and allocates liquidity across countries and argue that the advantage of multinational banking over offering cross-border financial services depends on the benefit and the cost of intimacy with local markets. The benefit is that it allows to create more liquidity. The cost is that it causes inefficiencies in internal capital markets, on which a multinational bank relies to allocate liquidity across countries. Capital requirements affect this trade-off by influencing the degree of inefficiency in internal capital markets.

Although domestic mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the financial services industry have increased steadily over the past two decades, international M&As were until recently relatively rare. Moreover, the share of cross-border mergers in the banking industry is low compared with other industries. This paper uses a novel dataset of over 3000 mergers that took place between 1985 and 2001 to analyze the determinants of international bank mergers. We test the extent to which information costs and regulations hold back merger activity. Our results suggest that information costs significantly impede cross-border bank mergers. Regulations also influence cross-border bank merger activity. Hence, policy makers can create environments that encourage cross-border activity, but information cost barriers must be overcome even in (legally) integrated markets.