Mortgage lenders that concentrate in a few markets invest more in information collection than diversified lenders. Concentrated lenders focus on the information-intensive jumbo market and on high-risk borrowers. They are better positioned to price risks and, thus, ration credit less. Adverse selection, however, leads to higher retention of mortgages relative to diversified lenders. Finally, concentrated lenders have higher profits than diversified lenders, their profits vary less systematically, and their stock prices fell less during the 2007—2008 credit crisis. The results imply that geographic diversification led to a decline in screening by lenders, which likely played a role in the 2007–2008 crisis.

We use a compound option-based structural credit risk model to estimate banking crisis risk for the United States based on market data on bank stocks on a daily frequency. We contribute to the literature by providing separate information on short-term, long-term and total crisis risk instead of a single-maturity risk measure usually inferred by Merton-type models or barrier models. We estimate the model by applying the Duan (1994) maximum-likelihood approach. A strongly increasing total crisis risk estimated from early July 2007 onwards is driven mainly by short-term crisis risk. Banks that defaulted or were overtaken during the crisis have a considerably higher crisis risk (especially higher long-term risk) than banks that survived the crisis.

We use a compound option-based structural credit risk model to infer a term structure of banking crisis risk from market data on bank stocks in daily frequency. Considering debt service payments with different maturities this term structure assigns a separate estimator for short- and long-term default risk to each maturity. Applying the Duan (1994) maximum likelihood approach, we find for Kazakhstan that the overall crisis probability was mainly driven by short-term risk, which increased from 25% in March 2007 to 80% in December 2008. Concurrently, the long-term default risk increased from 20% to only 25% during the same period.

We analyze the determinants fo standards and demand for loans to firms and house-holds over the last business cycle using the comprehensive and confidential Bank Lending Survery from the Euro area. There is significant variation of standards and demand over the cycle. Standards for business loans vary more during the business cycle than the lending standards for households, whereas credit demand from households varies more than demand from firms. Lending standards vary mainly due to charges in perception of borrower risk, bank balance sheet positions and competitive pressures. In particular, we find that higher GDP growth softens lending standards for all loans, i. e. lending standards are pro-cyclical. However, we also find pro-cyclicality in credit demand.

This study identifies five distinctive stages of the current global financial crisis: the meltdown of the subprime mortgage market; spillovers into broader credit market; the liquidity crisis epitomized by the fallout of Northern Rock, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers with counterparty risk effects on other financial institutions; the commodity price bubble, and the ultimate demise of investment banking in the U.S. The study argues that the severity of the crisis is influenced strongly by changeable allocations of global savings coupled with excessive credit creation, which lead to over-pricing of varied types of assets. The study calls such process a “wandering asset-price bubble“. Unstable allocations elevate market, credit, and liquidity risks. Monetary policy responses aimed at stabilizing financial markets are proposed.

Bei der Kreditrisikobewertung müssen die Parameter Ausfallwahrscheinlichkeit und

-korrelation geschätzt werden. Diese Schätzung erfolgt unter Unsicherheit. In der Literatur werden asymptotische Konfidenzregionen diskutiert, um diese Unsicherheit bei der simultanen Schätzung beider Parameter zu bewerten. Diese Regionen setzen allerdings eine sehr lange Datenhistorie für eine genaue Bewertung voraus. Als Alternative bietet sich bei kurzen Datenhistorien Bootstrapping an. Diese Methode ist allerdings deutlich rechenintensiver. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird untersucht, ab welcher Anzahl historisch verfügbarer Perioden Bootstrapping und eine Wald-Konfidenzregion zu einer vergleichbaren Bewertung des Kreditrisikos gelangen. Die hier genutzten Methoden führen zu ähnlichen Ergebnissen, wenn über 100 historische Perioden zur Verfügung stehen.

This study argues that the severity of the current global financial crisis is strongly influenced by changeable allocations of the global savings. This process is named a “wandering asset bubble”. Since its original outbreak induced by the demise of the subprime mortgage market and the mortgage-backed securities in the U.S., this crisis has reverberated across other credit areas, structured financial products and global financial institutions. Four distinctive stages of the crisis are identified: the meltdown of the subprime mortgage market, spillovers into broader credit market, the liquidity crisis epitomized by the fallout of Bear Sterns with some contagion effects on other financial institutions, and the commodity price bubble. Monetary policy responses aimed at stabilizing financial markets are proposed.

Bonitätsbewertungen durch Rating-Agenturen gewinnen durch die unter dem Stichwort Basel II diskutierten Reformvorschläge zur Bankenregulierung an Bedeutung. Insbesondere hängt das durch die Regulierung geforderte Mindesteigenkapital unter dem standardisierten Ansatz von Basel II von der Bewertung der Kreditrisiken durch externe Rating-Agenturen ab. Bonitätsbewertungen, speziell von souveränen Schuldnern, bestimmen damit wesentlich die Höhe des Mindesteigenkapitals von Banken. In der Vergangenheit haben Rating-Agenturen Währungskrisenrisiken systematisch unterschätzt. Diese sind jedoch für die Bewertung des Kreditausfallrisikos souveräner Schuldner wichtig. Die prozyklischen Effekte von Basel II entstehen vor allem dadurch, daß im Fall von Währungskrisen aufgrund der zu positiven Bewertung im Vorfeld der Krise schlagartig massive Herabstufungen notwendig werden. Diese Effekte können nur minimiert werden, wenn die währungskriseninduzierten Kreditausfallrisiken angemessen berücksichtigt werden. Die Kritik an der Methode der Rating-Agenturen, insbesondere an mangelnder Berücksichtigung neuerer Währungskrisenmodelle infolge der Asienkrisen von 1997/98, führte zu Reaktionen der Agenturen. So sagte z. B. Standard and Poor’s die Berücksichtigung mikroökonomischer Indikatoren zu, die bei aktuellen Krisen als Krisenfaktoren erkannt wurden. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird anhand eines Beispiels untersucht, inwiefern sich empirische Anzeichen dafür erkennen lassen, daß mikroökonomische Indikatoren in der Praxis der Bonitätsprüfung beachtet werden. Das Ergebnis der empirischen Untersuchungen zeigt, daß traditionelle makroökonomische Indikatoren die Rating-Ergebnisse dominieren. In aktuellen Ratings können keine Anzeichen für eine stärkere Berücksichtigung von Mikro-Indikatoren gefunden werden. Es muß daher geschlußfolgert werden, daß, wie in der Wirtschaft im Wandel 8/2007 ausgeführt, auch weiterhin prozyklische, krisenverstärkende Effekte von Basel II ausgehen. Die Rating-Agenturen erfüllen bislang die Rolle als frühzeitige Antizipatoren für Währungskrisenrisiken unzureichend.

This paper examines whether a large geopolitical event, such as the war in Iraq, can affect foreign bank lending from developed countries to emerging markets. Using country-level data, the paper analyzes the effects of economic shocks and the Iraq war on the availability of foreign bank credit to five countries in the Middle East and North Africa. The war has had a nonuniform effect on foreign banks: Although the war has led to higher U.S. lending, it has also discouraged British and Italian banks from lending to the region. Implications concerning the stability and reliability of foreign bank credit in the face of increased geopolitical risks are identified and discussed.

In this paper we study interdependencies between corporate foreign investment and the capital structure of banks. By committing to invest predominantly at home, firms can reduce the credit default risk of their lending banks. Therefore, banks can refinance loans to a larger extent through deposits thereby reducing firms’ effective financing costs. Firms thus have an incentive to allocate resources inefficiently as they then save on financing costs. We argue that imposing minimum capital adequacy for banks can eliminate this incentive by putting a lower bound on financing costs. However, the Basel II framework is shown to miss this potential.