This paper analyses the extent of technological capability of foreign subsidiaries located in East Germany, and looks at the determinants of foreign subsidiaries’ technological sourcing behaviour. The theory of international production underlines the importance of strategic and regional level variables. However, existing empirical approaches omit by and large regional level factors. We employ survey evidence from the “FDI micro data- base” of the IWH, that was only recently made available, to conduct our analyses. We find that foreign subsidiaries are above average technologically active in comparison to the whole East German manufacturing. This can be partially explained by the industrial structure of foreign direct investment. However, only a limited share of foreign subsidiaries with R&D and/or innovation activity source technological knowledge from the East German innovation system. If a subsidiary follows a competence augmenting strategy or does local trade, it is more likely to source technological knowledge locally. The endowment of a region with human capital and a scientific infrastructure has a positive effect too. The findings suggest that foreign subsidiaries in East Germany are only partially linked with the regional innovation system. Policy implications are discussed.

Previous empirical work on the link between domestic and foreign investment provides mixed results which partly depend on the level of aggregation of the data. We argue that the aggregated home country implications of foreign direct investment (FDI) cannot be gauged using firm-level data. Aggregated data, in turn, miss channels through which domestic and foreign activities interact. Instead, industry-level data provide useful information on the link between domestic and foreign investment. We theoretically show that the effects of FDI on the domestic capital stock depend on the structure of industries and the relative importance of domestic and multinational firms. Our model allows distinguishing intra-sector competition from inter-sector linkage effects. We test the model using data on German FDI. Using panel cointegration methods, we find evidence for a positive long-run impact of FDI on the domestic capital stock and on the stock of inward FDI. Effects of FDI on the domestic capital stock are driven mainly by intra-sector effects. For inward FDI, inter-sector linkages matter as well.

We use a new bank-level dataset to study the FDI-versus-exports decision for German banks. We extend the literature on multinational firms in two directions. First, we simultaneously study FDI and the export of cross-border financial services. Second, we test recent theories on multinational firms which show the importance of firm heterogeneity [Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J., Yeaple, S.R., 2004. Export versus FDI. American Economic Review 94 (1), 300–316]. Our results show that FDI and cross-border services are complements rather than substitutes. Heterogeneity of banks has a significant impact on the internationalization decision. More profitable and larger banks are more likely to expand internationally than smaller banks. They have more extensive foreign activities, and they are more likely to engage in FDI in addition to cross-border financial services.

Banks often concentrate their foreign direct investment (FDI) in certain countries. This clustering of activities could reflect either the attractiveness of a particular country or agglomeration effects. To find out which of the two phenomena dominates, we need to control for country-specific factors. We use new bank-level data on German banks’ FDI for the 1996-2003 period.We test whether the presence of other banks has a positive impact on the entry of new banks. Once we control for the attractiveness of a country through fixed effects, the negative impact of competition dominates. Hence, pure clustering effects are rather unimportant.

Foreign direct investment as a means to support system transformation and the ongoing process of catching-up development has caught researcher’s attention for a number of Central and Eastern European countries. Not much research, however, has been carried out for East Germany in this respect although FDI plays an important role in East Germany too. Descriptive analysis by the use of unique survey data shows that foreign and West German affiliates perform much better with respect to technological capability and labor productivity than domestic companies in East Germany. The results of the regression analysis, however, show that it is not the status of ownership as such that forms a significant determinant of innovativeness in East Germany but rather general firms specific characteristics attached to it such as firm size, export-intensity, technical state of the equipment, and R&D activities. Due to the fact that foreign and West German affiliates perform better with respect to exactly all of these characteristics, they can be considered as a means to support the process of technological renewal and economic development.

Foreign direct investment is an essential aspect of ‘globalization’ yet its empirical determinants are not well understood. What we do know is based either on poor data for a wide range of nations, or good data for the US and Swedish cases. In this paper, we provide evidence on the determinants of the activities of German multinational firms by using a newly available firm-level data set from the Deutsche Bundesbank. The specific goal of this paper is to demonstrate the relative role of country-level and firm-level determinants of foreign direct investment. We focus on three main questions: First, what are the main driving forces of German firms’ multinational activities? Second, is there evidence that sector-level and firm-level factors shape internationalization patterns? Third, is there evidence of agglomeration effects in the foreign activities of German firms? We find that the market access motive for internationalization dominates. Firms move abroad mainly to gain better access to large foreign markets. Cost-saving motives, however, are important for some manufacturing sectors. Our results strongly suggest that firm-level heterogeneity has an important influence on internationalization patterns – as stressed by recent models of international trade. We also find positive agglomeration effects for the activities of German firms that stem from the number of other German firms that are active on a given foreign market. In terms of lessons for economic policy, our results show that lowering barriers to the integration of markets and encouraging the formation of human capital can promote the activities of multinational firms. However, our results related to the heterogeneity of firms and agglomeration tendencies show that it might be difficult to fine-tune policies directed at the exploitation of synergies and at the creation of clusters of foreign firms.

Das Statistische Bundesamt hat seine ersten Berechnungen zum Bruttoinlandsprodukt und zu seinen Komponenten für das zweite Quartal 2004 vorgelegt und die bisherigen Ergebnisse für die zurückliegenden Vierteljahre überarbeitet – Anlass für eine Überprüfung der Konjunkturprognose des IWH. Laut amtlicher Neuberechnung für die ersten drei Monate des Jahres fiel die konjunkturelle Spaltung zwischen Auslands- und Inlandsnachfrage in Deutschland noch deutlicher aus als ursprünglich gemeldet, und diese Schere hat sich in den Monaten April bis Juni nicht verringert. Die Anpassung der Prognosewerte für das zweite Halbjahr, die dominiert wird von einer Aufwärtskorrektur des außenwirtschaftlichen Beitrags zur gesamtwirtschaftlichen Produktion, hat eine Erhöhung der Wachstumsprognose des Bruttoinlandsprodukts für dieses Jahr von 1,8% auf 2% zur Folge. Im Zuge der Verlangsamung des weltwirtschaftlichen Aufschwungs wird der konjunkturelle Impuls aus dem Ausland im weiteren Verlauf dieses und des nächsten Jahres an Stärke verlieren. Dafür gewinnt die Inlandsnachfrage wieder etwas an Schwung. Voraussetzung ist, dass die Unternehmen ihre Investitionszurückhaltung aufgeben und die über die Außenwirtschaft erzielten Gewinne in den Wirtschaftskreislauf zurückführen. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt wird 2005 um 1,8% höher als in diesem Jahr sein. Ohne Arbeitstageeffekt ergibt sich infolge des – wenn auch nur zögerlichen – Übergreifens der Konjunktur auf die Binnennachfrage ein Anstieg um 2%, nach 1,5% in diesem Jahr.

Die Investitionstätigkeit in Ostdeutschland ist durch massive staatliche Förderung gekennzeichnet. Die mit Abstand wichtigsten Instrumente, hinsichtlich des Fördervolumens sowie der Inanspruchnahme durch die Betriebe, sind die Investitionszulage und die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe zur „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur“ (GA). In diesem Beitrag wird der Einfluss untersucht, die die Teilnahme an der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe auf die Investitionshöhe ausübt. Das dabei auftretende Problem der Selbstselektion wird mit Hilfe eines Selektionsmodells gelöst. Auf der ersten Stufe wird mit einem Probitmodell die Teilnahmewahrscheinlichkeit an der GA-Förderung geschätzt.

Daran anschließend wird die Investitionshöhe der Betriebe erklärt, u.a. durch

die Teilnahme bzw. Nichtteilnahme an der GA-Förderung. Dabei stellt sich heraus, dass die Fördervariable im betrachteten Zeitraum einen signifikant positiven Effekt sowohl auf die Investitionen je Beschäftigten als auch auf die Investitionen je Umsatzeinheit ausübt, die GA-Förderung also investitionssteigernd wirkte.

Ausländischen Direktinvestitionen wird in den mittelosteuropäischen Ländern eine wesentliche Rolle als Multiplikator modernen Produktions- und Management-Knowhows zugeschrieben. Die sogenannten Technologie-Spillovers werden in der Theorie auf Externalitäten bzw. Extra-market-linkages erklärt. In der Praxis kommen sie über Demonstrationseffekte, Arbeitskräftemobilität, Zuliefererkontakte, Kundenkontakte oder Netzwerkaktivitäten zustande. Die empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der ungarischen Industrie zeigt jedoch, dass ausländische und einheimische Unternehmen vor allem aufgrund der hohen technologischen Entwicklungsunterschiede weitgehend getrennte Sphären innerhalb des Industriesektors bilden. Daher kommen Technologie- Spillover als innovationsförderndes Instrument einheimischer Unternehmen kaum zustande.

This paper reviews how long-term relationships between firms and banks shape the structure and integration of banking markets worldwide. Bank relationships arise to span informational asymmetries that are endemic in financial markets. Firm-bank relationships not only entail specific benefits and costs for both the engaged firms and banks, but also directly affect the structure of banking markets. In particular, the sunk cost of screening and monitoring activities and the 'informational capital' collected by the incumbent banks may act as a barrier to entry. The intensity of the existing firm-bank relationships will determine the height of this barrier and shape the structure of international banking markets. For example, in Scandinavia where firms maintain few and strong relationships, foreign banks may only be able to enter successfully through mergers and acquisitions. On the other hand, Southern European firms maintain many bank relationships. Therefore, banks may consider entering Southern European banking markets through direct investment.