The new Europe

The financial crisis is largely over, yet confidence in the ECB and EU remains low. Thanks to Brexit and populism, there is currently no shortage of challenges – nor of a visionary upswing in some parts of Europe.

Dossier

 

In a nutshell

Billions in taxpayers' money has been spent rescuing banks since the financial crisis erupted in 2008. From the debt crisis to the euro crisis, the EU stumbled from one low point to the next. Greece in particular had to contend with a loss of confidence on the international financial markets – from which Germany gained considerable benefit, by the way. The refugee crisis followed in 2015, with the Brexit referendum in the UK and the election of Donald Trump in 2016. But new visionaries also took to the international stage, including the new French President, Emmanuel Macron.

Our expert

All experts, press releases, publications and events on "The New Europe"

 

In order to reboost the economy, the European Central Bank (ECB) has been pursuing a much criticised excessively low interest rate policy for years, which we can assume is benefitting German households, however. Since 2015, the ECB has been buying bonds from European institutions and states – a measure for which there are justifiable grounds. Since June 2016, it has also been buying corporate bonds, and published the results of the second stress test round in July 2016.

"ECB is one of the few institutions contributing to the solution."

It turns out that the ECB is taking specific action to continue providing momentum and security to the European economy. "It is one of the few institutions contributing to the solution", according to Reint E. Gropp, President of the IWH. "But to achieve a sustainable solution, politicians need to act much more decisively." However, countries are different as to how quickly they implement reforms and hand oversight over to EU-institutions.
The refugee crisis was and still is one of the EU's main stumbling blocks. A lack of cooperation between member states has allowed the humanitarian crisis to continue to spread, with immigration and the distribution of refugees remaining a critical issue, despite the EU-Turkey Agreement. Immigrants' integration into the labour market, especially in Germany, will remain a political challenge for decades. But science must also provide analyses and potential solutions. For example, the Leibniz Association's "Crises of a globalised world" research network has addressed the issue of the refugee crisis.

Migration was and is a constant issue when it comes to Brexit. But the UK's decision to leave the EU also touched on other economic dimensions: Even before the referendum, an IWH study had already suggested that the pound would react strongly to the UK's departure. With the increasing likelihood of Brexit, more than 50% of researchers asked by Thomas Krause predicted a significant devaluation of the pound against other currencies, including the euro. Stock market price volatility therefore reached record levels ahead of the referendum. "This turbulence reflected the uncertainty that was and is associated with the Brexit decision", states Gropp. The President takes a calm view the fate of London's financial centre, however: "London's financial centre will retain its dominant position within Europe despite Brexit. This is based on both the experience gained from the introduction of the euro and is also due to London's considerable location factors: the size of the city, the regulatory environment and its human assets." Should the United Kingdom withdraw from the EU in a „hard Brexit“ in March 2019, exports to Great Britain are likely to decline. Export-oriented EU countries such as France and Germany, as well as important suppliers like China would suffer job losses. In Germany, the car industry would be most affected.

On a third front, the EU is fighting for the confidence of its citizens. But while on the one hand, the popularity levels of eurosceptic parties rose or national conservative parties even governed some Member States in the past, the EU also appears to be reinventing itself: Neither Brexit nor the election of Donald Trump in the US have fractured the EU. On the contrary. Despite meeting with domestic resistance, French president Emmanuel Macron is a committed European. The EU also now aims to close ranks when it comes to defense.

Crises are always an opportunity for change. It is no secret that the EU has potential for improvement in many respects. Perhaps this new momentum will finally trigger other important change processes: improvements to the democratic legitimacy of the EU institutions, less regulation of the labour and product markets, a reduction in bureaucracy both in the EU and its member states, the implementation of the capital markets union and a new weighting for EU spending. This is the only way for the EU to remain sustainable – prepared for future financial crises and strengthened by new cohesion.

Publications on "The New Europe"

Mere Criticism of the ECB is no Solution

Reint E. Gropp

in: One-off Publications, No. 1, 2016

Abstract

Criticism in Germany of the ECB is counter-productive. Monetary policy must remain expansive so that it can at least begin to fulfil the ECB mandate. The preservation of its credibility also demands that. Instead of the ECB doing less, European policymakers must do more. They need to act more decisively to set Europe back upon a growth path. [A shorter version was published under the title “Kritik an Draghi ist noch keine Lösung“ in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung of April 10, 2016]. Policymakers, including in Germany, can no longer shirk their responsibility for the current economic situation in large parts of Europe. That calls for growth-friendly fiscal policy, structural reforms to open up new markets and consolidation and restructuring of the financial sector. We in Germany, above all, must look in the mirror, because we need the majority of these reforms just as urgently as our European neighbours do.

read publication

Cover_IWH-Online_2016_de.jpg

“The German Saver” and the Low Policy Rate Environment

Reint E. Gropp Vahid Saadi

in: IWH Online, No. 9, 2015

Abstract

It is widely claimed that “the German saver” suffers (i.e. generates significantly lower returns on her savings) in the low interest environment that Germany currently experiences relative to a high interest rate environment. With “low interest rate environment”, the observers tend to mean “low policy rates”, i.e. the European Central Bank’s (ECB) main refinancing rate.

read publication

Cover_IWH-Online_2016_de.jpg

Germany’s Benefit from the Greek Crisis

IWH

in: IWH Online, No. 7, 2015

Abstract

This note shows that the German public sector balance benefited significantly from the European/Greek debt crisis, because of lower interest payments on public sector debt. This is due to two effects: One, in crisis times investors disproportionately seek out safe investments (“flight to safety“), bidding down the returns on safe-haven assets. We show that German bunds strongly benefited from this effect during the Greek debt crisis. Second, while the European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy stance was quite close to an “optimal“ monetary policy stance for Germany from 1999 to 2007, during the crisis monetary policy was too accommodating from a German perspective, due to the emerging disparities across the Euro area. As a result of these two effects, our calculations suggest that the German sovereign saved more than 100 billion Euros in interest expenses between 2010 and mid-2015. That is, Germany benefited from the Greek crisis even in case that Greece defaults on all its debt (a total of 90 billions) owed to the German government via diverse channels (European Stability Mechanism [ESM], International Monetary Fund [IMF], or directly).

read publication

cover_wiwa_2015-3.jpg

Der Europäische Gerichtshof und der Grexit

Reint E. Gropp

in: Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 3, 2015

Abstract

Die Europäische Zentralbank hat vom Europäischen Gerichtshof (EuGH) grünes Licht für den Ankauf von Staatsanleihen bekommen. Wie der EuGH ent-schied, dürfen die Zentralbanker unter Einhaltung bestimmter Bedingungen Staatsanleihen der Euroländer aufkaufen. Die Richter billigen damit ein Programm, das auf eine Entscheidung des EZB-Rats im September 2012 zurückgeht: Die Notenbank werde notfalls unbegrenzt Staatsanleihen von Euroländern kaufen, um die Währung zu stützen, hatte damals EZB-Präsident Mario Draghi verkündet. Allerdings darf die Zentralbank nur tätig werden, wenn das betroffene Land bestimmten Qualitätsansprüchen genügt oder unter den Euro-Rettungsschirm geschlüpft ist und folglich strenge Reformvorgaben erfüllen muss. Die Richter argumentieren, dass das Programm die währungspolitischen Befugnisse der EZB nicht überschreite. Es verstoße nicht gegen das Verbot der monetären Finanzierung von Mitgliedstaaten, sondern es handele sich dabei um ein Programm, das dem Bereich der Währungspolitik zuzuordnen sei und zu dem Ziel der EZB beitrage, die Preisstabilität in den Mitgliedstaaten zu gewährleisten. Die Entscheidung gibt der EZB auch Rückendeckung beim aktuell laufenden Anleihekaufprogramm (quantitative easing) vom Frühjahr dieses Jahres. Dieses hat zum Ziel, bis Ende September 2016 Staatsanleihen und Anleihen anderer staatlicher Einheiten aller Eurostaaten im Wert von bis zu einer Billion Euro anzukaufen. Damit soll Deflations-tendenzen entgegengewirkt werden.

read publication

cover_wiwa_2015-3.jpg

Perspectives for Future Research on European Urban Development: Workshop im Rahmen eines deutsch-russischen Kooperationsprojekts

A. Förtsch Albrecht Kauffmann

in: Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 3, 2015

Abstract

Das im September 2012 auf Initiative der damaligen Abteilung Stadtökonomik gestartete Projekt zur Anbahnung gemeinsamer Forschungsarbeiten des Leontief Centre St. Petersburg (LC) und des IWH zu Fra-gen der wirtschaftlichen Neupositionierung post-sozialistischer Städte fand am 25. und 26. Februar 2015 mit einem Workshop in Halle (Saale) seinen vorläufigen Abschluss. Neben den beteiligten Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern des LC und des IWH nahmen auch Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler anderer Forschungseinrichtungen teil, deren Forschung Bezüge zur Fragestellung des vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) geförderten Projekts aufweist. In den vorangehenden zweieinhalb Jahren gab es einen inten-siven Austausch zwischen beiden Instituten u. a. in Form von Gastaufenthalten, gegenseitiger Hilfe bei der Datenbeschaffung und ­aufbereitung und gemeinsamen Auftritten bei wissenschaftlichen Veranstaltungen. Im Rahmen des Abschlussworkshops wurden Ergebnisse der gemeinsamen Arbeit wie auch thematisch verwandter Untersuchungen vorgetragen und diskutiert.

read publication
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoWeltoffen Logo