In jeder arbeitsteiligen Gesellschaft ist Wirtschaftspolitik erforderlich. Im Rahmen der Wirtschaftspolitik wird versucht, ein komplexes Geflecht von Zielen zu erreichen. Es kann auch vorkommen, dass mit dem Erreichen eines Ziels ein anderes geschwächt wird. Dies ist Gegenstand des vorliegenden Beitrags. Konkret geht es um das Ziel Verbesserung der Wirtschaftsstruktur und das Umweltziel. Das Strukturziel wird in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland unter anderem über die Investitionszuschüsse im Rahmen der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‚Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur‘ verfolgt, die über die Länder ausgereicht werden. Einige Länder sind dazu übergegangen, die Gewährung von Investitionszuschüssen an Sekundärziele, zum Beispiel auch den Umweltschutz, zu knüpfen. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschreibt einen aktuellen Fall aus dem politischen Diskussionsprozess, in dem die Höhe des Fördersatzes an die Einführung von so genannten Umweltmanagementsystemen gebunden wird. Der Beitrag zeigt, dass unter bestimmten Konstellationen die Investitionstätigkeit gebremst wird und gleichzeitig Umweltmanagementsysteme nicht eingeführt werden. Damit hätte man beide Ziele nicht erreicht. Der bessere Weg bestünde in der direkten Unterstützung von Unternehmen, bei denen ein Umweltmanagementsystem sinnvoll ist, wie es bereits durch Programme auf Landesebene praktiziert wird.

This paper analyzes the importance of teacher quality at the college level. Instructors are matched to objective and subjective characteristics of teacher quality to estimate the impact of rank, salary, and perceived effectiveness on student performance and subject interest. Student and course fixed effects, time of day and week controls, and students' lack of knowledge about first-year instructors help minimize selection biases. Subjective teacher evaluations perform well in measuring instructor influences on students, while objective characteristics such as rank and salary do not. Overall, the importance of college instructor differences is small, but important outliers exist.

Even though state aid in order to rescue or restructure ailing companies is regularly granted by European governments, it is often controversially discussed. The aims for rescuing companies are manifold and vary from social, industrial and even political considerations. Well-known examples are Austrian Airlines (Austria) or MG Rover (Great Britain). Yet, this study aims to answer the question whether state aid is used effectively and whether the initial aim why aid has been paid has been reached, i.e. the survival of the company. By using data on rescued companies in the EU and applying a survival analysis, this paper investigates the survival rates of these companies up to 15 years after the aid has been paid. In addition, the results are compared to the survival rates of non-rescued companies which have also been in difficulties. The results suggest that despite the financial support, business failure is often only post-poned; best survival rates have firms with long-term restructuring, enterprises in Eastern Europe, smaller firms and mature companies. However, non-funded companies have an even higher ratio to go bankrupt.

The paper presents estimates for the impact of related variety, unrelated variety and the functions a region performs in the production process on regional employment growth in Germany. We argue that regions benefit from the existence of related activities that facilitate economic development. Thereby the sole reliance of the related and unrelated variety concept on standard industrial classifications (SIC) remains debatable. We offer estimations for establishing that conceptual progress can be made when the focus of analysis goes beyond solely considering industries. We develop an industry-function based approach of related and unrelated variety and test our hypothesis by the help of spatial panel approach. Our findings suggest that related variety as same as unrelated variety facilitate regional employment growth in Germany. However, the drivers behind these effects do differ. While the positive effect of related variety is driven by high degrees of relatedness in the regional “R&D” and “White-Collar”-functions, the effects of unrelated variety are spurred by “Blue Collar”-functions in this period.

We study the effects of place-based policies on aggregate productivity using administrative data on projects co-financed by the EU in Italy linked to balance sheet data. We exploit quasi-experimental variation in funding for a large place-based policy stemming from measurement error in regional GDP estimates. Results show that the policy likely decreases productivity. Decompositions reveal that aggregate declines are driven by reallocation of labor to low-productivity firms. Mechanism analysis using firm-level event studies reveals that negative reallocation effects are caused by high-productivity firms taking up the funds and subsequently becoming more liquidity constrained, leading to slowdowns in employment growth.