Matching und Anreize in Finanzmärkten

In dieser Forschungsgruppe werden Matching-Mechanismen in Finanzmärkten untersucht. In Finanzmärkten lassen sich Auswahlentscheidungen ganz unterschiedlicher Akteure zur Herstellung von Beziehungen beobachten: Fusionen und Übernahmen zwischen Unternehmen, Arbeitsverträge zwischen Managern und Unternehmen, Kreditbeziehungen zwischen Banken und Unternehmen. Die Forschungsgruppe möchte die Anreize verstehen, die bestimmen, warum bestimmte Akteure einander zugeordnet werden, wie diese Zuordnung geschieht und welche Rolle die Auswirkungen des Matches spielen.

Forschungscluster
Institutionen und soziale Normen

Ihr Kontakt

Juniorprofessor Shuo Xia, Ph.D.
Juniorprofessor Shuo Xia, Ph.D.
Mitglied - Abteilung Finanzmärkte
Nachricht senden +49 345 7753-875 Persönliche Seite

Referierte Publikationen

cover_The-North-American-Journal-of-Economics-and-Finance.gif

Tornado Activity, House Price and Stock Returns

Michael Donadelli Michael Ghisletti Marcus Jüppner Antonio Paradiso

in: The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, im Erscheinen

Publikation lesen

cover_the-review-of-corporate-finance-studies.png

Tournament Incentives and Acquisition Performance

Iftekhar Hasan Marco Navone Thomas To Eliza Wu

in: The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, im Erscheinen

Publikation lesen

cover_journal-of-management.png

The Influence of Bondholder Concentration and Temporal Orientation on Investments in R&D

Pengfei Ye Jonathan O’Brien Christina Matz Carnes Iftekhar Hasan

in: Journal of Management, im Erscheinen

Abstract

Although innovation can be a critical source of competitive advantage, research has found that debt can erode management’s willingness to invest in R&D. In this article, we employ a stakeholder bargaining power perspective to argue that this effect is most pronounced when the firm’s bonds are concentrated in the hands of bond blockholders. Furthermore, we contend that the temporal orientation of bondholders influences this relationship. Specifically, while it is commonly assumed that bondholders have a limited temporal orientation that induces them to focus on short-term value appropriation, we argue that some bond blockholders adopt a long-term temporal orientation. This orientation, in turn, makes them more inclined to support long-term value creation for the firm in the form of enhanced investments in R&D. Moreover, while agency theory suggests that there is an inherent conflict of interest between shareholders and bondholders, our results suggest that the temporal orientation of investors (i.e., both shareholders and bondholders) matters much more than whether they invested in the firm’s equity or its debt.

Publikation lesen
  • 1

Arbeitspapiere

Lame-Duck CEOs

Marc Gabarro Sebastian Gryglewicz Shuo Xia

in: SSRN Working Papers, 2018

Abstract

We examine the relationship between protracted CEO successions and stock returns. In protracted successions, an incumbent CEO announces his or her resignation without a known successor, so the incumbent CEO becomes a “lame duck.” We find that 31% of CEO successions from 2005 to 2014 in the S&P 1500 are protracted, during which the incumbent CEO is a lame duck for an average period of about 6 months. During the reign of lame duck CEOs, firms generate an annual four-factor alpha of 11% and exhibit significant positive earnings surprises. Investors’ under-reaction to no news on new CEO information and underestimation of the positive effects of the tournament among the CEO candidates drive our results.

Publikation lesen

Selection Versus Incentives in Incentive Pay: Evidence from a Matching Model

Shuo Xia

in: SSRN Working Papers, 2018

Abstract

Higher incentive pay is associated with better firm performance. I introduce a model of CEO-firm matching to disentangle the two confounding effects that drive this result. On one hand, higher incentive pay directly induces more effort; on the other hand, higher incentive pay indirectly attracts more talented CEOs. I find both effects are essential to explain the result, with the selection effect accounting for 12.7% of the total effect. The relative importance of the selection effect is the largest in industries with high talent mobility and in more recent years.

Publikation lesen
  • 1
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoWeltoffen Logo