Socioeconomic inequalities shape who accesses early childcare, even in countries that claim universal provision. This entrenched inequality limits child development, women’s employment and gender equality — but governments have clear tools to close the gap.

We investigate whether a change in political leadership affects health outcomes. To do so, we exploit turnover elections that move partisan individuals into and out of alignment with the party of the President. We document that the lack of political alignment has a negative, immediate, and long-lasting effect on health. We do not find any evidence that our results can be explained by other confounding trends or by changes in economic outcomes or other economic policies. Further results suggest that political sentiments and social isolation are important potential mechanisms in this setting and that lack of political representation affects the mental health of individuals.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of mandatory face mask usage triggered a heated debate. A major point of controversy is whether community use of masks creates a false sense of security that would diminish physical distancing, counteracting any potential direct benefit from masking. We conducted a randomized field experiment in Berlin, Germany, to investigate how masks affect distancing and whether the mask effect interacts with the introduction of an indoor mask mandate. Joining waiting lines in front of stores, we measured distances kept from the experimenter in two treatment conditions – the experimenter wore a mask in one and no face covering in the other – in two time spans – before and after mask use becoming mandatory in stores. We find no evidence that mandatory masking has a negative effect on distance kept toward a masked person. To the contrary, masks significantly increase distancing and the effect does not differ between the two periods. However, we show that after the mandate distances are shorter in locations where more non-essential stores, which were closed before the mandate, had reopened. We argue that the relaxations in general restrictions that coincided with the mask mandate led individuals to reduce other precautions, like keeping a safe distance.

In gesundheitspolitischen Debatten wird vielfach mehr Wettbewerb zwischen Krankenversicherungen als Mittel zur Steigerung der Effizienz des Gesundheitswesens empfohlen. In diesem Beitrag werden die Folgen eines idealtypischen Wettbewerbs zwischen Krankenversicherungen für Kosten und Qualität der medizinischen Versorgung diskutiert. Es wird argumentiert, dass die Kosten im Wettbewerb keineswegs sinken, sondern steigen, weil konkurrierende Kostenträger die starke Position der Leistungserbringer am Markt schlechter ausgleichen können als der Staat oder ein Versicherungskartell. Der Wettbewerb kann ferner dazu führen, dass sich der Markt segmentiert: einerseits in Versicherungen, die bei niedrigen Beiträgen nur Zugang zu unbeliebten Ärzten bieten, und andererseits Versicherungen, die gegen höhere Beiträge die freie Arztwahl garantieren. Die mit stärkerem Versicherungswettbewerb verbundene Einschränkung der freien Arztwahl beeinträchtigt den Ärztewettbewerb um Patienten.