Public Research Institutions in East Germany: a Promising Base for Economic Upturn?
Gerhard Heimpold, Martin T. W. Rosenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 15,
2001
Abstract
In the 1990s a lot was done to strengthen public research efforts in East Germany. The main indicators relating to public research reflect an ambivalent picture. Investment by universities and public research institutions outside the universities reached a higher level than in West Germany. However, there remains an East-West gap with respect to the capital stock. The per capita stock of R&D staff in the university sector reached almost the level in the old Länder. With respect to the university R&D in engineering sciences, among those fields of university research which are particularly business-related, per capita stock of staff as well as per capita investment in the Eastern German Länder are above the West German level. In university natural science the East-West pattern of the R&D input factors mentioned is reversed. The receipts of the universities acquired from research contracts, which may be used as an indicator to assess the quality of public research, reveal shortcomings. These shortcomings, though these have been partly caused by the transitional situation in East Germany`s universities, where new institutions were built up only gradually. The R&D institutions outside the universities are obviously better equipped than such institutions in West Germany.
The visible advantages offered by public sector research institutions in East Germany might be used much more intensively to foster the economic reconstruction in East Germany. In parallel with this, the remaining shortcomings of public R&D in East Germany should be eliminated. If reductions in universities´ capacities (due, for instance, to a declining number of persons who have a university entrance qualification) seem to be inevitable, the consequences of such restrictions should be carefully reconsidered.
Read article
On the Future EU Cohesion Policies in Association States: the
Johannes Stephan
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 15,
2001
Abstract
Not only are levels of economic development in the association states in Central
East Europe lower than the average EU-15. They furthermore exhibit significantly
different sectoral structures. Does this suggest that a large fraction of the develop-
ment gap can be explained by those sectoral differences? In its latest report on
cohesion policy, the EU Commission accordingly placed particular emphasis on
sectoral structures when contemplating future intervention policy in newly acceeding
members.
Our analysis shows, however, that the patterns of sectoral structures play only a
minor role as determinants of the lower level of development, measured here as
productivity gap. The explanatory power of sectoral differennces is significant only
in Slovakia. The suggestions made in the EU-report is not supported by our
analysis. The existing programmes appear to be well equipped to account for the
particuliarities in transition economies.
Read article
Germany: Cyclical Improvement not Until the End of the Year
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 12,
2001
Abstract
During the second quarter of 2001 German overall production stagnated. Weak global development muddied the economic prospects of firms and prevented them from rising their output and their investment activities. In 2001 gross national product will only increase by 1%; the number of unemployed will be higher than expected. Nevertheless, we advise against an increase in public expenditure that aims at stimulating the economy. Anyhow, growing public deficits, caused by cyclical movements, should be accepted. In order to increase employment labour market reforms become more urgent.
In East Germany, currently even a decline in gross national product cannot be excluded. After the first period of restructuring, which has been accompanied by structural problems, cyclical movements become more important. In addition, economic stagnation burdens labour markets. Nonetheless trying to stimulate the East German economy by government spending programmes does not seem to be a viable strategy. From the cyclical point of view they are not very efficient and concerning structural problems they are no solution.
Read article
Charity engagement of german savings banks: extent and regional effects
Martin Wengler
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 12,
2001
Abstract
The german savings banks spent in in the year 2000 about 542 Mio. DM for charity projects. These funds influence the soft location factors in a positiv way and support the decrease of social disparities in economic peripheral regions.
Read article
The East-West entrepreneurial gap – a crucial economic problem in East Germany?
Gerhard Heimpold
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2001
Abstract
The ratio of business units per inhabitant is one of the most important factors that determine the development of economies and regions, because it has a strong impact on competition, employment and innovation. In East Germany, where the process of catching up has decelerated since the mid-nineties, the findings on this topic are ambivalent: on the one hand, half a million self-employed persons are counted and a similar number of companies are registered by the regional Chambers of Industry and Commerce. Furthermore, about 157.000 companies engaged in handicraft exist. These figures can be regarded as a success compared to the beginning of the nineties at the outset of systemic transformation. On the other hand, a striking entrepreneurial gap in East Germany still exists compared to the situation in the western part. It seems that this gap will not be closed in the near future, even on the contrary: the number of newly registered business units in East Germany has declined. Against this background, the promotion of entrepreneurship will remain a great challenge on the political agenda.
Read article
Discussion of IWH theses on EU regional structural policy – Report on a Brussels Round Table on Regional Policy in Europe
Martin T. W. Rosenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2001
Abstract
Mit der EU-Osterweiterung wird eine Reform der EU-Regionalpolitik erforderlich sein. Für Deutschland und vor allem für die neuen Länder hat dies erhebliche Bedeutung, weil Ostdeutschland derzeit als sogenannte Ziel-1-Region die höchste Förderpriorität genießt. Das IWH hat Thesen zur Regionalpolitik in Europa vorgelegt, die bei der Auftaktveranstaltung eines Brüsseler „Round Table on Regional Policy in Europe“ präsentiert und diskutiert wurden.
Read article
Does East Germany need a new technology policy? – Implications from the functioning of the R&D market after the transformation
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 145,
2001
Abstract
Technology policy is a major part of government's efforts in contributing to East Ger-many's economic recovery. However, even a decade after unification East Germany does not produce sufficient technology goods. Thus, the question is whether technology policy is either not suitable or inefficient in tackling East Germany's deficits. A special technology policy for East Germany is justified by the lack of regional networks for technology firms; without a compensating policy East Germany would continue to lag behind West Germany also with respect to incomes. Yet only a few of the policy in-struments applied so far are efficiently dealing with these deficits. Thus, a future technology policy for East Germany should – mainly by the supply of R&D-infrastructure – support implementation of these kinds of networks.
Read article
Regional structural policy in an enlarged EU: A reform proposal
Hubert Gabrisch, Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 6,
2001
Abstract
Recently, the EC-Commission has presented its ideas for future cohesion policies after the enlargement of the EU by Eastern European states. By applying the actual rules in an enlarged EU, financial aid would be concentrated in the East European countries. In this article it is argued that the criteria for success to the structural funds should not be altered, but that there should be a phasing out of aid for the regions in Western Europe. Additionally, funding under the cohesion fund and the objective 2- and objective-3-shemes should be terminated to get enough financial means to finance objective-1-programmes.
Read article
Employment threshhold shows declining trend
Christian Dreger, Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2001
Abstract
The paper estimates Okuns law for countries of the eurozone using paneleconometric methods. Based on the results the minimum growth rate needed for a reduction in unemployment is calculated. In the period under investigation, the minimum growth rate has declined. Actually unemployment will be reduced through economic growth, and the minmum growth rates are lower than in the past. However growth must be accompanied by structural reforms in the labor market.
Read article
Differences in productivity and convergence of economic regions – The example of the New Länder -
Gerald Müller, Joachim Ragnitz, Anita Wölfl
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 3,
2001
Abstract
Auch im Jahre 2000 liegt das Produktivitätsniveau, das im Durchschnitt der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft erreicht wird, bei nur etwa zwei Dritteln des westdeutschen Wertes. Zwar gibt es eine erhebliche Differenzierung nach Unternehmen, nach Branchen und nach Regionen. Im Ganzen stellen die neuen Länder aber noch immer eine strukturschwache Region dar, und es ist offenkundig, dass das Ziel einer Angleichung der Pro-Kopf-Einkommen an das Westniveau kurzfristig nicht erreicht werden kann.
Die Frage, weshalb das Produktivitätsniveau in der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft weiterhin deutlich niedriger liegt als in Westdeutschland, ist auch 10 Jahre nach der deutschen Vereinigung noch nicht abschließend geklärt. In der Literatur gibt es zwar inzwischen eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlich gut begründeter Hypothesen, mit denen der Produktivitätsrückstand auf verschiedene betriebsinterne und -externe Faktoren zurückgeführt werden soll. Eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung fehlt aber bislang noch. Auch die Frage, welche Schlussfolgerungen angesichts des anhaltend niedrigen Produktivitätsniveaus für den weiteren Konvergenzprozess zu ziehen sind, ist noch nicht überzeugend beantwortet.
Angesichts dieser Forschungsdefizite hat das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie mit Schreiben vom 29. April 1998 das Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle beauftragt, im Rahmen der sektoralen Strukturberichterstattung das Thema „Produktivitätsunterschiede und Konvergenz von Wirtschaftsräumen – Das Beispiel der neuen Länder“ zu bearbeiten. Das IWH legt hiermit den Abschlussbericht zu diesem Projekt vor.
Read article