Supranational Rules, National Discretion: Increasing versus Inflating Regulatory Bank Capital?
Reint E. Gropp, Thomas Mosk, Steven Ongena, Ines Simac, Carlo Wix
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
Nr. 2,
2024
Abstract
We study how banks use “regulatory adjustments” to inflate their regulatory capital ratios and whether this depends on forbearance on the part of national authorities. Using the 2011 EBA capital exercise as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that banks substantially inflated their levels of regulatory capital via a reduction in regulatory adjustments — without a commensurate increase in book equity and without a reduction in bank risk. We document substantial heterogeneity in regulatory capital inflation across countries, suggesting that national authorities forbear their domestic banks to meet supranational requirements, with a focus on short-term economic considerations.
Artikel Lesen
OVERHANG: Schuldenüberhang und grüne Investitionen
OVERHANG: Schuldenüberhang und grüne Investitionen – die Rolle von Banken für den klimafreundlichen Umgang mit emissionsintensiven Anlagenvermögen Teilprojekt 1: Politische…
Zur Seite
Forschungsgruppen
Unsere Forschungsgruppen Anpassungsfähigkeit und Resilienz des Finanzsystems Banken, Regulierung und Anreizstrukturen Betriebliche Dynamiken und Beschäftigungsergebnisse Bildung,…
Zur Seite
Is Risk the Fuel of the Business Cycle? Financial Frictions and Oil Market Disturbances
Christoph Schult
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 4,
2024
Abstract
I estimate a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model for the United States that incorporates oil market shocks and risk shocks working through credit market frictions. The findings of this analysis indicate that risk shocks play a crucial role during the Great Recession and the Dot-Com bubble but not during other economic downturns. Credit market frictions do not amplify persistent oil market shocks. This result holds as long as entry and exit rates of entrepreneurs are independent of the business cycle.
Artikel Lesen
Forschungscluster
Drei Forschungscluster Jede IWH-Forschungsgruppe ist einem themenorientieren Forschungscluster zugeordnet. Die Cluster stellen keine eigenen Organisationseinheiten dar, sondern…
Zur Seite
Macroeconomic Effects from Sovereign Risk vs. Knightian Uncertainty
Ruben Staffa
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 27,
2023
Abstract
This paper compares macroeconomic effects of Knightian uncertainty and risk using policy shocks for the case of Italy. Drawing on the ambiguity literature, I use changes in the bid-ask spread and mid-price of government bonds as distinct measures for uncertainty and risk. The identification exploits the quasi-pessimistic behavior under ambiguity-aversion and the dealer market structure of government bond markets, where dealers must quote both sides of the market. If uncertainty increases, ambiguity-averse dealers will quasi-pessimistically quote higher ask and lower bid prices – increasing the bid-ask spread. In contrast, a pure change in risk shifts the risk-compensating discount factor which is well approximated by the change in bond mid-prices. I evaluate economic effects of the two measures within an instrumental variable local projection framework. The main findings are threefold. First, the resulting shock time series for uncertainty and risk are uncorrelated with each other at the intraday level, however, upon aggregation to monthly level the measures become correlated. Second, uncertainty is an important driver of economic aggregates. Third, macroeconomic effects of risk and uncertainty are similar, except for the response of prices. While sovereign risk raises inflation, uncertainty suppresses price growth – a result which is in line with increased price rigidity under ambiguity.
Artikel Lesen
14.12.2023 • 30/2023
Konjunktur aktuell: Export und privater Konsum schwach – Deutschland wartet auf den Aufschwung
Im Winter 2023/2024 ist die deutsche Wirtschaft weiter im Abschwung. Teile der Industrie haben an Wettbewerbsfähigkeit eingebüßt, die Realeinkommen sind inflationsbedingt im Jahr 2023 zurückgegangen, und es herrscht Unsicherheit über den Kurs der Finanzpolitik. Allerdings dürften wieder steigende Realeinkommen und etwas anziehende Exporte ab dem Frühjahr für eine Belebung sorgen. Das Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) prognostiziert, dass das Bruttoinlandsprodukt im Jahr 2023 um 0,3% sinken und im Jahr 2024 um 0,5% expandieren dürfte (Ostdeutschland: +0,5% und +0,7%). Im September waren die IWH-Konjunkturforscher noch von einem Minus von 0,5% für Deutschland im Jahr 2023 ausgegangen und hatten einen Zuwachs von 0,9% für das kommende Jahr erwartet.
Oliver Holtemöller
Lesen
Common Venture Capital Investors and Startup Growth
Ofer Eldar, Jillian Grennan
Review of Financial Studies,
Nr. 2,
2023
Abstract
We exploit the staggered introduction of liability waivers when investors hold stakes in conflicting business opportunities as a shock to venture capital (VC) investment and director networks. After the law changes, we find increases in within-industry VC investment and common directors serving on startup boards. Despite the potential for rent extraction, same-industry startups inside VC portfolios benefit by raising more capital, failing less, and exiting more successfully. VC directors serving on other startup boards are the primary mechanism associated with positive outcomes, consistent with common VC investment facilitating informational exchanges in VC portfolios.
Artikel Lesen
Ostdeutschland
Die garstige Lücke Warum Ostdeutschland auch 30 Jahre nach der Vereinigung um 20% ärmer ist als der Westen Dossier Auf den Punkt Der wirtschaftliche Aufholprozess Ostdeutschlands…
Zur Seite
Herding Behavior and Systemic Risk in Global Stock Markets
Iftekhar Hasan, Radu Tunaru, Davide Vioto
Journal of Empirical Finance,
September
2023
Abstract
This paper provides new evidence of herding due to non- and fundamental information in global equity markets. Using quantile regressions applied to daily data for 33 countries, we investigate herding during the Eurozone crisis, China’s market crash in 2015–2016, in the aftermath of the Brexit vote and during the Covid-19 Pandemic. We find significant evidence of herding driven by non-fundamental information in case of negative tail market conditions for most countries. This study also investigates the relationship between herding and systemic risk, suggesting that herding due to fundamentals increases when systemic risk increases more than when driven by non-fundamentals. Granger causality tests and Johansen’s vector error-correction model provide solid empirical evidence of a strong interrelationship between herding and systemic risk, entailing that herding behavior may be an ex-ante aspect of systemic risk, with a more relevant role played by herding based on fundamental information in increasing systemic risk.
Artikel Lesen
