Towards Deeper Financial Integration in Europe: What the Banking Union Can Contribute
Claudia M. Buch, T. Körner, Benjamin Weigert
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 13,
2013
Abstract
The agreement to establish a Single Supervisory Mechanism in Europe is a major step towards a Banking Union, consisting of centralized powers for the supervision of banks, the restructuring and resolution of distressed banks, and a common deposit insurance system. In this paper, we argue that the Banking Union is a necessary complement to the common currency and the Internal Market for capital. However, due care needs to be taken that steps towards a Banking Union are taken in the right sequence and that liability and control remain at the same level throughout. The following elements are important. First, establishing a Single Supervisory Mechanism under the roof of the ECB and within the framework of the current EU treaties does not ensure a sufficient degree of independence of supervision and monetary policy. Second, a European institution for the restructuring and resolution of banks should be established and equipped with sufficient powers. Third, a fiscal backstop for bank restructuring is needed. The ESM can play a role but additional fiscal burden sharing agreements are needed. Direct recapitalization of banks through the ESM should not be possible until legacy assets on banks’ balance sheets have been cleaned up. Fourth, introducing European-wide deposit insurance in the current situation would entail the mutualisation of legacy assets, thus contributing to moral hazard.
Artikel Lesen
Monopolistic Competition and Costs in the Health Care Sector
Ingmar Kumpmann
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 17,
2009
Abstract
Competition among health insurers is widely considered to be a means of enhancing efficiency and containing costs in the health care system. In this paper, it is argued that this could be unsuccessful since health care providers hold a strong position on the market for health care services. Physicians exert a type of monopolistic power which can be described by Chamberlin’s model of monopolistic competition. If many health insurers compete with one another, they cannot counterbalance the strong bargaining position of the physicians. Thus, health care expenditure is higher, financing either extra profits for physicians or a higher number of them. In addition, health insurers do not have an incentive to contract selectively with health care providers as long as there are no price differences between physicians. A monopolistic health insurer is able to counterbalance the strong position of physicians and to achieve lower costs.
Artikel Lesen
Health care expenditures in OECD countries. A panel unit root and cointegration analysis
Christian Dreger, Hans-Eggert Reimers
Externe Publikationen,
2005
Abstract
Im Papier wird der Zusammenhang zwischen Gesundheitsausgaben und Bruttoinlandsprodukt mit panelökonometrischen Verfahren für 21 OECD Länder untersucht. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Studien werden alternative Indikatoren des medizinisch-technischen Fortschritts einbezogen (Lebenserwartung, Kindersterblichkeit, Anteil älterer Menschen). Durch die Erweiterung des Modells mit diesen Indikatoren ergibt sich eine Einkommenselastizität der Gesundheitsausgaben von 1. Gesundheit kann daher nicht als Luxusgut angesehen werden: nachdem für den medizoinisch-technischen Fortschritt kontrolliert wird, entwickeln sich die Gesundheitsausgaben proportional zum Einkommen.
Artikel Lesen
Pension Reform in Hungaryie
Peter Gedeon
IWH-Sonderhefte,
Nr. 5,
2000
Abstract
In Hungary social policy reforms in general and the pension reform in particular followed the introduction of the institutions of market economy with a considerable time lag, if at all. Although it was clear from the outset that the communist welfare state could not be sustained, comprehensive institutional reforms in the pension or health care systems were not introduced in the first six years of the postsocialist transition. This uneasiness to reform the social security systems has to do with the contradicting constraints decision makers have to face in the process of systemic change.
Artikel Lesen
Liberalization of health services in Europe: Who benefits from cross-border care?
Vera Dietrich
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 107,
1999
Abstract
Artikel Lesen
