IWH-Tarif-Check
IWH-Tarif-Check Der IWH-Tarif-Check analysiert die realen Einkommenswirkungen...
Zur Seite
Interactions Between Bank Levies and Corporate Taxes: How is Bank Leverage Affected?
F. Bremus, Kirsten Schmidt, Lena Tonzer
Journal of Banking and Finance,
September
2020
Abstract
Regulatory bank levies set incentives for banks to reduce leverage. At the same time, corporate income taxation makes funding through debt more attractive. In this paper, we explore how regulatory levies affect bank capital structure, depending on corporate income taxation. Based on bank balance sheet data from 2006 to 2014 for a panel of EU-banks, our analysis yields three main results: The introduction of bank levies leads to lower leverage as liabilities become more expensive. This effect is weaker the more elevated corporate income taxes are. In countries charging very high corporate income taxes, the incentives of bank levies to reduce leverage turn insignificant. Thus, bank levies can counteract the debt bias of taxation only partially.
Artikel Lesen
Profit Shifting and Tax‐rate Uncertainty
Manthos D. Delis, Iftekhar Hasan, Panagiotis I. Karavitis
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,
5-6
2020
Abstract
Using firm‐level data for 1,084 parent firms in 24 countries and for 9,497 subsidiaries in 54 countries, we show that tax‐motivated profit shifting is larger among subsidiaries in countries that have stable corporate tax rates over time. Our findings further suggest that firms move away from transfer pricing and toward intragroup debt shifting that has lower adjustment costs. Our results are robust to several identification methods and respecifications, and they highlight the important role of tax‐rate uncertainty in the profit‐shifting decision while pointing to an adjustment away from more costly transfer pricing and toward debt shifting.
Artikel Lesen
Interactions between Bank Levies and Corporate Taxes: How is the Bank Leverage Affected?
F. Bremus, Kirsten Schmidt, Lena Tonzer
Abstract
Regulatory bank levies set incentives for banks to reduce leverage. At the same time, corporate income taxation makes funding through debt more attractive. In this paper, we explore how regulatory levies affect bank capital structure, depending on corporate income taxation. Based on bank balance sheet data from 2006 to 2014 for a panel of EU-banks, our analysis yields three main results: The introduction of bank levies leads to lower leverage as liabilities become more expensive. This effect is weaker the more elevated corporate income taxes are. In countries charging very high corporate income taxes, the incentives of bank levies to reduce leverage turn ineffective. Thus, bank levies can counteract the debt bias of taxation only partially.
Artikel Lesen
Interactions Between Regulatory and Corporate Taxes: How Is Bank Leverage Affected?
F. Bremus, Kirsten Schmidt, Lena Tonzer
Abstract
Regulatory bank levies set incentives for banks to reduce leverage. At the same time, corporate income taxation makes funding through debt more attractive. In this paper, we explore how regulatory levies affect bank capital structure, depending on corporate income taxation. Based on bank balance sheet data from 2006 to 2014 for a panel of EU-banks, our analysis yields three main results: The introduction of bank levies leads to lower leverage as liabilities become more expensive. This effect is weaker the more elevated corporate income taxes are. In countries charging very high corporate income taxes, the incentives of bank levies to reduce leverage turn ineffective. Thus, bank levies can counteract the debt bias of taxation only partially.
Artikel Lesen
Taxation, Corruption, and Growth
Philippe Aghion, Ufuk Akcigit, Julia Cagé, William R. Kerr
European Economic Review,
2016
Abstract
We build an endogenous growth model to analyze the relationships between taxation, corruption, and economic growth. Entrepreneurs lie at the center of the model and face disincentive effects from taxation but acquire positive benefits from public infrastructure. Political corruption governs the efficiency with which tax revenues are translated into infrastructure. The model predicts an inverted-U relationship between taxation and growth, with corruption reducing the optimal taxation level. We find evidence consistent with these predictions and the entrepreneurial channel using data from the Longitudinal Business Database of the US Census Bureau. The marginal effect of taxation for growth for a state at the 10th or 25th percentile of corruption is significantly positive; on the other hand, the marginal effects of taxation for growth for a state at the 90th percentile of corruption are much lower across the board. We make progress towards causality through Granger-style tests and by considering periphery counties where effective tax policy is largely driven by bordering states. Finally, we calibrate our model and find that the calibrated taxation rate of 37% is fairly close to the model׳s estimated welfare maximizing taxation rate of 42%. Reducing corruption provides the largest potential impact for welfare gain through its impact on the uses of tax revenues.
Artikel Lesen
Editorial
Martin T. W. Rosenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 2,
2012
Abstract
In letzter Zeit stehen die Finanzprobleme von Euroländern wie Griechenland im Zentrum der öffentlichen Aufmerksamkeit, während die finanzielle Schieflage der Städte und Gemeinden in Deutschland etwas aus dem Blickfeld geraten ist. Zwar hat es hier in jüngster Zeit eine gewisse Entspannung gegeben. Aber diese wird nicht nachhaltig sein, solange – wie bislang – strukturelle Reformen zur Stärkung der kommunalen Ebene ausbleiben. Gerade für die Kommunen in Ostdeutschland ist wegen des Auslaufens des Solidarpaktes II, sinkender Hilfszahlungen der Europäischen Union sowie der abnehmenden Bevölkerung auf längere Sicht mit finanziellen Problemen zu rechnen. Es wäre an der Zeit, neben der immer wieder geforderten Stärkung der kommunalen Kompetenzen bei der Besteuerung auch eine Lichtung des Dickichts an Regulierungen in Angriff zu nehmen, mit denen Bund und Länder die Erledigung kommunaler Aufgaben gegenwärtig zu steuern versuchen.
Artikel Lesen
Regulation and Taxation: A Complementarity
Benjamin Schoefer
Journal of Comparative Economics,
Nr. 4,
2010
Abstract
I show how quantity regulation can lower elasticities and thereby increase optimal tax rates. Such regulation imposes regulatory incentives for particular choice quantities. Their strength varies between zero (laissez faire) and infinite (command economy). In the latter case, regulation effectively eliminates any intensive behavioral responses to taxes; a previously distortionary tax becomes a lump sum. For intermediate regulation (where some deviation is feasible), intensive behavioral responses are still weaker than under zero regulation, and so quantity regulation reduces elasticities, thereby facilitating subsequent taxation. I apply this mechanism to labor supply and present correlational evidence for this complementarity: hours worked in high-regulation countries are compressed, and these countries tax labor at higher rates.
Artikel Lesen
Editorial
Ulrich Blum
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 6,
2010
Abstract
Gerät man in eine Zwickmühle, so hilft ein Befreiungsschlag. Zwänge sind durch innovatives und damit vor allem auch überraschendes Handeln, das nicht vorhergesehen und damit in der Wirkung abgeschwächt werden kann, zu überwinden. Schuldenlast und die Steuerbelastung bewirken derartige Zwänge, weshalb beide zurückgeführt werden müssen. Das gelingt durch Sparen und Konsolidieren oder auch durch dynamisches Wachstum. Beides steht in einem scheinbaren Widerspruch. Da Schulden aber unbillige personale und generationenspezifische Verteilungsungerechtigkeiten erzeugen und „Schuldenblasen“ in einer Spekulationsblase mit verheerenden Wirkungen für die Volkswirtschaft platzen können, müssen sie zurückgeführt werden. Eine effiziente Besteuerung kann helfen: Die Orientierung an der ökonomischen Leistungsfähigkeit impliziert auch, dass der Finanzsektor an den Kosten seiner Rettung beteiligt wird. Die Maßnahmen dürfen das Wachstum nicht abwürgen, plakativ: statt einer keynesianischen Hölle ein ricardianisches Paradies!
Artikel Lesen
