Capital Account Liberalisation Does Worsen Income Inequality
Xiang Li, Dan Su
IWH-Diskussionspapiere,
Nr. 7,
2020
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between capital account liberalisation and income inequality. Adopting a novel identification strategy, namely a difference-in-difference estimation combined with propensity score matching between the liberalised and closed countries, we provide robust evidence that opening the capital account is associated with an adverse impact on income inequality in developing countries. The main findings are threefold. First, fully liberalising the capital account is associated with a small rise of 0.07-0.30 standard deviations in the Gini coefficient in the short-run and a rise as large as 0.32-0.62 standard deviations in the ten years after liberalisation, on average. Second, widening income inequality is the outcome of the growing income share of the rich at the cost of the poor. The long-term effect of capital account liberalisation includes a reduction in the income share of the poorest half by 2.66-3.79 percentage points and an increase in the income share of the richest 10% by 5.19-8.76 percentage points. Third, the directions and categories of capital account liberalisation matter. Inward capital account liberalisation is more detrimental to income equality than outward capital account liberalisation, and free access to the international equity market exacerbates income inequality the most, while foreign direct investment has an insignificant impact on inequality.
Artikel Lesen
Foreign Bank Ownership and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence
Manthos D. Delis, Iftekhar Hasan, Nikolaos Mylonidis
Applied Economics,
Nr. 11,
2020
Abstract
Using country-level panel data over 1995–2013 on within-country income inequality and foreign bank presence, this paper establishes a positive relation between the two, running from higher foreign bank presence to income inequality. Given that foreign bank participation increased by 62% over the period 1995 to 2013, our baseline results imply a 5.8% increase in the Gini coefficient on average over this period, ceteris paribus. These results are robust to the inclusion of country and year fixed effects and to the use of restrictions on foreign bank entry in the host countries as an instrumental variable. We show that this positive effect is channelled through the lack of greenfield entry and the associated lower levels of competition.
Artikel Lesen
Weigt
Who Buffers Income Losses after Job Displacement? The Role of Alternative Income Sources, the Family, and the State ...
Zur Seite
Ostdeutschland
Nachhut Ostdeutschland Nur mit Investitionen in Köpfe lässt sich weiter aufholen ...
Zur Seite
13. IWH/IAB-Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik – ein Tagungsbericht
Eva Hank, Mario Bossler
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 5,
2016
Abstract
Mit dem Schwerpunkt „Lohn- und Einkommensungleichheit – Ausmaß und Entwicklung, Ursachen und Konsequenzen“ hat der diesjährige Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik, der traditionell gemeinsam vom Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) und dem Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) veranstaltet wird, erneut ein wirtschaftspolitisch aktuelles Thema behandelt. Es handelte sich um den 13. deutschsprachigen Workshop dieser Art, der am 22. und 23. September am IWH in Halle (Saale) veranstaltet wurde.
Artikel Lesen
