IWH-Bauumfrage
IWH-Bauumfrage Das IWH führte seit dem Jahr 1993 bis zum ersten Quartal 2017...
Zur Seite
Verhalten
Die Mathematik der Bauchentscheidungen Zuerst Kosten und Nutzen sorgfältig abwägen und dann rational...
Zur Seite
Demographischer Wandel
Demographischer Wandel Deutschland wird älter. Es darf seine junge Generation nicht überfordern. Und es sollte...
Zur Seite
Unternehmensinsolvenzen seit Ausbruch der Pandemie
Steffen Müller
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 2,
2021
Abstract
Die Insolvenzzahlen sind trotz Corona-Krise stark gesunken. Aufgrund zahlreicher Großinsolvenzen wie etwa von Esprit, Hallhuber oder Wirecard war das Jahr 2020 bezogen auf die Zahl der betroffenen Beschäftigten trotzdem ein schwieriges Jahr. Eine Insolvenzwelle mit vielen gefährdeten Jobs ab Sommer 2021 ist aufgrund staatlicher Unterstützungsmaßnahmen und abwartendem Verhalten der Unternehmen eher unwahrscheinlich. Soweit es die Pandemielage zulässt, sollten Stützungsmaßnahmen bereits im Jahr 2021 auf den Prüfstand, um eine „Zombifizierung“ der Wirtschaft zu verhindern.
Artikel Lesen
24.06.2021 • 17/2021
Einsam durch die Pandemie – soziale Isolierung erhöht Bereitschaft zu egoistischem Verhalten
Die soziale Distanzierung als Maßnahme gegen die COVID-19-Pandemie hat weitreichende gesellschaftliche Folgen, die aus ökonomischer Perspektive bislang kaum diskutiert wurden. Dies geht aus einer Untersuchung des Leibniz-Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) hervor. „Die Erfahrung der sozialen Isolierung führte dazu, dass die Teilnehmenden unserer Studie eher egoistische Entscheidungen treffen“, sagt Studienautorin Sabrina Jeworrek, Juniorprofessorin an der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg und Forschungsgruppenleiterin in der Abteilung Strukturwandel und Produktivität am IWH.
Sabrina Jeworrek
Pressemitteilung lesen
Alone at Home: The Impact of Social Distancing on Norm-consistent Behavior
Sabrina Jeworrek, Joschka Waibel
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 8,
2021
Abstract
Around the globe, the COVID-19 pandemic has turned daily live upside down since social distancing is probably the most effective means of containing the virus until herd immunity is reached. Social norms have been shown to be an important determinant of social distancing behaviors. By conducting two experiments and using the priming method to manipulate social isolation recollections, we study whether social distancing has in turn affected norms of prosociality and norm compliance. The normative expectations of what behaviors others would approve or disapprove in our experimental setting did not change. Looking at actual behavior, however, we find that persistent social distancing indeed caused a decline in prosociality – even after the relaxation of social distancing rules and in times of optimism. At the same time, our results contain some good news since subjects seem still to care for norms and become more prosocial once again after we draw their attention to the empirical norm of how others have previously behaved in a similar situation.
Artikel Lesen
Unethical Employee Behavior Against Coworkers Following Unkind Management Treatment: An Experimental Analysis
Sabrina Jeworrek, Joschka Waibel
Managerial and Decision Economics,
Nr. 5,
2021
Abstract
We study unethical behavior toward unrelated coworkers as a response to managerial unkindness with two experiments. In our lab experiment, we do not find that subjects who experienced unkindness are more likely to cheat in a subsequent competition against another coworker who simultaneously experienced mistreatment. A subsequent survey experiment suggests that behavior in the lab can be explained by individuals' preferences for norm adherence, because unkind management behavior does not alter the perceived moral appropriateness of cheating. However, having no shared experience of managerial unkindness opens up some moral wiggle room for employees to misbehave at the costs of others.
Artikel Lesen
Consumer Defaults and Social Capital
Brian Clark, Iftekhar Hasan, Helen Lai, Feng Li, Akhtar Siddique
Journal of Financial Stability,
April
2021
Abstract
Using account level data from a credit bureau, we study the role that social capital plays in consumer default decisions. We find that borrowers in communities with greater social capital are significantly less likely to default on loans, even after adjusting for different levels of income and other characteristics such as credit scores. The results are strongest for potentially strategic defaults on mortgages; a one standard deviation increase in social capital reduces such defaults by 12.4 %. These results can be generalized to any mortgage default. Our results also indicate that the effect of social capital is most prominent among more creditworthy borrowers, suggesting that when given a choice, the social cost of defaulting is an important factor affecting default decisions. We find a similar impact of social capital on consumer defaults in other datasets with more detailed information on borrowers as well. Our results are robust to modeling and methodology choices, as well as controlling for other drivers of default such as wealth, income and amenities from homeownership. Our results suggest that increasing social capital via measures to build community cohesion such as promotion of owner-occupied home ownership may be one avenue to deter consumer default.
Artikel Lesen
