Die Vermeidung von CO2 und das EEG – eine unnötig teure Lösung – ein Kommentar
Henry Dannenberg, Wilfried Ehrenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 3,
2009
Abstract
In Deutschland existiert mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) ein Instrument, das auch die Senkung von CO2-Emissionen zum Zweck hat. Die Sinnhaftigkeit dieses Gesetzes wird in jüngster Zeit in der deutschen Medienlandschaft vehement in Zweifel gezogen. Es wird bemängelt, dass die Verschmutzungsrechte, die aufgrund der mit dem EEG eingesparten CO2-Emissionen frei werden, verkauft werden können. So würden die eingesparten Emissionen in gleicher Menge an anderer Stelle entstehen. Der CO2-Zertifikatehandel wurde 2005 als Instrument der europäischen Klimapolitik eingeführt. Ziel ist es, zu erreichen, dass eine von der Politik für einen bestimmten Zeitraum vorgegebene Emissionsmenge nicht überschritten wird. Der Emissionshandel wurde deshalb gewählt, da durch dieses Instrument genau dort Emissionen eingespart werden, wo die Reduktion am kosteneffizientesten ist. Durch die sukzessive Reduktion der von der Politik erlaubten CO2-Menge soll so ein Beitrag zum Klimaschutz geleistet werden. Leider trifft die Kritik am EEG nicht immer den eigentlichen Kern. Es ist wenig zielführend, darüber zu streiten, ob die durch das EEG eingesparten Zertifikate in Deutschland oder in Polen verbraucht werden – das ist ein Effekt des Emissionshandels. Relevant hingegen ist die Frage, ob es effizient ist, durch das EEG CO2 einzusparen, oder ob dieselbe Menge CO2 preiswerter an anderer Stelle eingespart werden kann. Mit der Einführung des CO2-Zertifikatehandels hat die Politik aber anerkannt, dass der Markt am besten in der Lage ist, die Investitionsmöglichkeiten zu identifizieren, mit denen eine gewünschte Reduktionsmenge am preiswertesten realisiert werden kann. Sobald die Politik durch Anreize diesen Allokationsmechanismus stört, mindert sie die gesamtwirtschaftliche Wohlfahrt.
Read article
Obama und die Wende der US-Klimapolitik – ein Kommentar
Wilfried Ehrenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 12,
2008
Abstract
Die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika sind mit einem Anteil von rund 21% neben China (ebenfalls rund 21%) und der EU (ca. 16%) der größte CO2-Emittent der Erde. Anfang November haben die USA einen neuen Präsidenten gewählt: Barack Obama. Während des Wahlkampfs wurden zeitweilig Spekulationen laut, dass Arnold Schwarzenegger Umwelt- bzw. Energieminister werden soll, wenn Obama Präsident wird. Der Gouverneur von Kalifornien gilt als Vorreiter in Sachen Klimaschutz und nachhaltige Energiepolitik in den USA. Seine Position führte in der Vergangenheit wiederholt zu Spannungen zwischen ihm und Präsident George W. Bush. Schwarzenegger hatte mit dem ‚California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006‘ ein Gesetz unterzeichnet, mit Hilfe dessen der Ausstoß von Treibhausgasen bis 2020 auf das Niveau von 1990 sinken soll. Im November 2008 unterzeichnete der Gouverneur eine Verordnung, die besagt, dass bis 2020 ein Drittel des Energieverbrauchs Kaliforniens aus erneuerbaren Quellen gewonnen werden soll. Zusammen mit sechs weiteren US-Staaten und vier kanadischen Provinzen will Kalifornien ab 2012 ein CO2-Emissionshandelssystem einführen.
Read article
German Economy on the Brink of Recession
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
2. Sonderausgabe
2008
Abstract
In autumn 2008, the word economy is in a downswing, caused by the commodity and energy price hike of the first half of the year, housing crises in the US and some other important countries, and in particular by the financial crisis that has recently intensified. The downswing will continue this year and for some time during 2009, and will only come to an end later next year if governments and central banks succeed in stabilizing financial markets in the coming months. In this case, lower prices of commodities and still high growth dynamics in important emerging markets countries will lead to a tentative revival of the world economy.
The German economy is on the brink of a recession. It is particularly vulnerable to a global downswing because exports of investment goods are of upmost importance for the overall economy. Because the uncertainty about the worldwide effects of the financial crisis is very high, the forecast is split. A more probable scenario is based on the assumption of a stabilizing world economy. In this scenario, the growth rate of the German economy in 2009 is 0.2%. The second scenario is based on the assumption of a worldwide recession next year and forecasts that German GDP will shrink by 0.8% in 2009.
Concerning policy, the institutes recommend a strengthening of the capital base of banks via injection of government money. This should be done in a way that gives incentives to banks for attracting additional capital from private sources.
A special chapter of the report analyzes the nature and causes of the price hikes of energy and commodities in the first half of 2008.
Read article
In Focus: State is Winner of Recent German Upswing
Axel Lindner
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2008
Abstract
In 2006 and 2007, production expanded briskly in Germany. Real disposable incomes of private households, however, were almost stagnant. This article sheds, with help of national accounts data, some light on the reasons for this discrepancy: By far the most important factor is that the share of the general government in the disposable income of the whole economy increased strongly. The share of corporations in the disposable income increased, too. Finally, the deflator for consumption rose by more than the deflator of GDP mainly because of the price hike for imported commodities and energy.
Read article
Business Cycle Forecast: On the Edge?
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2008
Abstract
During the summer of 2008, the world economy was further slowing. The financial crisis affects the real economy by tightened credit standards in the US and in the European Union, and housing markets are now in a severe crisis not only in the US, but also in some countries in Western Europe. Finally, consumption of households is affected by stagnating real disposable incomes due to the energy price hike. The slowing world economy, however, has caused the oil price to fall since July, and most emerging markets economies are, up to now, quite resilient.
In Germany, sentiment has deteriorated significantly. Production appears to be about stagnating in the summer. During winter, the devaluation of the euro and a beginning pick up of demand since July will help producers of tradable goods in Germany. Domestic demand will be supported by lower energy prices and healthily growing wage incomes. All in all, gross domestic product (gdp) (adjusted for the number of working days) will increase by 1,8% this year and by 0,8% in 2009.
Read article
Business Cycle Forecast, Summer 2008: Price Hikes and Financial Crisis Cloud Growth Prospects
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2008
Abstract
In the summer of 2008 the turmoil on financial markets and that on the markets for energy dim the prospects for the world economy. The acceleration of the oil price hike during the first half of the year has led to an increase in expected inflation and to higher interest rates on capital markets, while stock prices are going down. At the same time, the financial crisis is far from over, and banks in the US and in Western Europe continue in their efforts to consolidate their balance sheets. Thus, the expansion of credit supply will be scarcer in the next quarters. All this means that demand will slow in the developed economies during the next quarters. However, the massive fiscal stimulus will help the US economy to stabilize, and the world economy still benefits from the high growth dynamics in the emerging markets economies. All in all, the developed economies will not reach their potential growth rate before the second half of 2009. In Germany, the upswing comes to a temporary halt during summer of this year. Slowing foreign demand and the oil price hike induce firms to postpone investments, and private consumption, the soft spot of the upswing in Germany, is still sluggish due to high inflation rates that impair purchasing power. For the end of 2008, chances are good that growth in Germany accelerates again, because German exporters are still penetrating emerging markets as competitiveness does not diminish. All in all, the German economy will grow by 2.3% in 2008 (mainly due to the very high dynamics at the beginning of the year) and by 1.3% in 2009. A main risk of this forecast is that monetary policy fails in easing the high inflationary pressures. As to fiscal policy, efforts to reach sustainable public finances should not weaken.
Read article
Consequences of the US-subprime Crisis Dampen Economic Growth in Germany
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
1. Sonderausgabe
2008
Abstract
The crises of the housing and the financial sector in the US and the turmoil on worldwide financial markets have clouded the prospects of the world economy for this and next year. In particular, conditions for financing consumption and investment will worsen. In addition, the price hikes for energy and food entail a redistribution of purchasing power from ordinary households to the producers of these goods. As a consequence of all this, the economy in the US will be more or less stagnating this year, and world growth will slow down. Firms in the nonfinancial sector, however, are generally in good financial condition, policy in the US takes strong measures to contain the crisis, and growth dynamics in emerging markets economies appear to be robust enough to withstand the dampening effects. In Germany, the economy is, in spite of the adverse effects from abroad and in particular the strong appreciation of the euro, still in good shape. Apparently, the economy has become more robust in the past years, partly due to increased competitiveness of German producers. Still, economic expansion will slow down, with annual growth rates of 1.8% for this year and 1.4% for 2009.
For the first time the forecast of the institutes comprises a medium term projection. For this, the potential growth rate of the German Economy is estimated to be 1.6%. As to policy recommendations, the institutes advise against the establishment of minimum wages in Germany, because they fear adverse effects for employment. In this point the IWH and its partners take a different view.
Read article
German Economic Growth in 2008: Temporary Slow Down
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2008
Abstract
World economic growth has slowed in the first months of 2008. The main causes are the crisis in the US housing sector and the turmoil in the financial sector in general, the spreading expectation of a recession in the US, and sharply rising prices for energy and food. The German economy, though, is still expanding healthily, with strong investment and export activities. Private consumption, however, shrank at the end of 2007. In 2008, while favorable labor market conditions will improve job security and thus the propensity to consume, real incomes will not rise by much due to the risen inflation rate; consumption will again expand only modestly this year. A slower expansion of the world economy and the stronger euro will dampen exports and investment. All in all, growth will slow to (working-day adjusted) 1.2% in 2008. Chances are good that in the next year, after the negative shocks have faded out a bit, growth will be accelerating again. The East German Economy was on a lower growth path in 2006 and 2007 than the economy in the West, according to recently revised national accounts data. Industrial production, however, is more dynamic in the East. Unemployment rates will continue to decrease faster in the East: as in the rest of Germany, employment is growing, and, contrary to what happens in the West, the labor force is shrinking.
Read article
Russia: Importance of the Energy Sector for the Economic Growth Remains High
Martina Kämpfe
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2007
Abstract
In 2006, Russian economic growth was once more driven by surging private consumption and investment. Thanks to the high energy prices, the boom in export revenues continued. Enterprises had increased earnings from oil and other natural resources, and also the government budget had high surpluses. Both led to significantly faster growth of investments. Construction sector and industry benefited from rising investments, but domestic demand of investment and consumption also covered by increased imports. The importance of the energy sector for the economy remains high. But sustainable long-term growth will require even more investment as well as substantial improvements in economic restructuring.
Read article
Gesamtwirtschaftliche Effekte der Förderung regenerativer Energien, insbesondere der Biomasse - Eine kritische Beurteilung vor dem Hintergrund modelltheoretischer Konzeptionen
Götz Zeddies
Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 2/2006,
No. 2,
2006
Abstract
Renewable energies are largely promoted in the Federal Republic of Germany by means of political instruments by the federal government as well as by the federal states. However, the effects of promoting renewable energies on growth and employment are politically controversial. On the part of the scientists, the macroeconomic effects of the promotion of renewable energies were already analysed in different studies by various authors. At first sight, even the scientific results do not allow definite conclusions. The reasons for this may be seen in the diversity of the applied empirical methods and models with respect to their closeness and the model assumptions. Against the background of these difficulties, the aim of this paper is to discuss the general problems of macroeconomic policy analyses, to formulate methodical model requirements and to examine important existing scientific studies with respect to these requirements and to evaluate their results.
Read article