Climate policy design must balance emissions mitigation with concerns for fairness, particularly as climate change disproportionately affects the poorest households within and across countries. Integrated Assessment Models used for global climate policy evaluation have so far typically not considered inequality effects within countries. To fill this gap, we develop a global Integrated Assessment Model representing national economies and subnational income, mitigation cost, and climate damage distribution and assess a range of climate policy schemes with varying levels of effort sharing across countries and households. The schemes are consistent with limiting temperature increases to 2 °C and account for the possibility to use carbon tax revenues to address distributional effects within and between countries. We find that carbon taxation with redistribution improves global welfare and reduces inequality, with the most substantial gains achieved under uniform taxation paired with global per capita transfers. A Loss and Damage mechanism offers significant welfare improvements in vulnerable countries while requiring only a modest share of global carbon revenues in the medium term. The poorest households within all countries may benefit from the transfer scheme, in particular when some redistribution is made at the country level. Our findings underscore the potential for climate policy to advance both environmental and social goals, provided revenue recycling mechanisms are effectively implemented. In particular, they demonstrate the feasibility of a welfare improving global climate policy involving limited international redistribution.

We examine how banks manage carbon transition risk by selling loans given to polluting borrowers to less regulated shadow banks in securitization markets. Exploiting the election of Donald Trump as an exogenous shock that reduces carbon risk, we find that banks’ securitization decisions are sensitive to borrowers’ carbon footprints. Banks are more likely to securitize brown loans when carbon risk is high but swiftly change to keep these loans on their balance sheets when carbon risk is reduced after Trump’s election. Importantly, securitization enables banks to offer lower interest rates to polluting borrowers but does not affect the supply of green loans. Our findings are more pronounced among domestic banks and banks that do not display green lending preferences. We discuss how securitization can weaken the effectiveness of bank climate policies through reducing banks’ incentives to price carbon risk.

Why are children with lower socioeconomic status (SES) substantially less likely to be enrolled in child care? We study whether barriers in the application process work against lower-SES children — the group known to benefit strongest from child care enrollment. In an RCT in Germany with highly subsidized child care (N = 607), we offer treated families information and personal assistance for applications. We find substantial, equity-enhancing effects of the treatment, closing half of the large SES gap in child care enrollment. Increased enrollment for lower-SES families is likely driven by altered application knowledge and behavior. We discuss scalability of our intervention and derive policy implications for the design of universal child care programs.

Does information leakage in a target's social networks increase its stock price prior to a merger announcement? Evidence reveals that a target with more social connections indeed experiences a higher pre-announcement price run-up. This effect does not exist during or after the merger announcement, or in windows ending two months before the announcement. It is more pronounced among targets with severe asymmetric information, and weaker when the information about the upcoming merger is publicly available prior to the announcement. It is also weaker in expedited deals such as tender offers.

Die IAB-Stellenerhebung ist eine quartalsweise durchgeführte und repräsentative Betriebsbefragung über das gesamtwirtschaftliche Stellenangebot sowie Einstellungsprozesse in Deutschland. Die Erhebung ermittelt die Gesamtzahl aller offenen Stellen am Arbeitsmarkt, einschließlich jener Stellen, die nicht der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (BA) gemeldet werden. Das erste Modul des Fragebogens enthält Informationen zur Zahl und Struktur offener Stellen, dem erwarteten künftigen Arbeitskräftebedarf, zur wirtschaftlichen Lage und zur Entwicklung der befragten Betriebe. Das zweite Modul erfragt die betriebliche Einschätzung und Nutzung aktueller arbeitsmarktpolitischer Instrumente sowie den betrieblichen Umgang mit am Arbeitsmarkt benachteiligten Personen. Das dritte Modul enthält Fragen zum letzten Fall einer Neueinstellung und zum letzten Fall eines gescheiterten Rekrutierungsversuchs. Das Forschungsdatenzentrum der Bundesagentur für Arbeit stellt die Datensätze der Befragungswellen ab 2000 mit allen Fragebogenteilen einschließlich der Quartalsbefragungen für externe Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler bereit.