Economic Transition in Unified Germany and Implications for Korea
Hyung-Gon Jeong, Gerhard Heimpold
H.-G. Jeong and G. Heimpold (eds.): Economic Transition in Unified Germany and Implications for Korea. Policy References 17-13. Sejong: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy,
2017
Abstract
The reunification of Germany, which marked the end of the Cold War in the 20th century, is regarded as one of the most exemplary cases of social integration in human history. Nearly three decades after the German reunification, the economic and social shocks that occurred at the beginning of the reunification process have largely been resolved. Moreover, the unified Germany has grown into one of the most advanced economies in the world.
The unification process that Germany underwent may not necessarily be the way that the Republic of Korea would choose. However, the economic and social exchanges between East and West Germany prior to unification, and the cooperation in a myriad of policies based on these exchanges, served as the crucial foundation for unification. The case of Germany will surely help us find a better way for the re-unification of the Korean Peninsula.
In this context, this is the first edition of a joint research which provides diverse insights on social and economic issues during the process of unification. It consists of nine chapters whose main topics include policies on macroeconomic stabilization, the privatization of state-owned enterprises in East Germany, labor policies and the migration of labor, integration of the social safety nets of the North and South, and securing finances for reunification. To start with, the first part covers macroeconomic stabilization measures, which include policies implemented by the federal government of Germany to overcome macroeconomic shocks directly after the reunification. There was a temporary setback in the economy at the initial phase of reunification as the investment per GDP went down and the level of fiscal debt escalated, reverting to its original trend prior to the reunification. While it appears the momentum for growth was compromised by reunification from the perspective of growth rate of real GDP, this state did not last long and benefits have outpaced the costs since 2000.
In the section which examines the privatization of state-owned enterprises in East Germany, an analysis was conducted on the modernization of industrial infrastructure of East German firms. There was a surge in investment in East German area at the beginning stages but this was focused on a specific group of firms. Most of the firms were privatized through unofficial channels, with a third of these conducted in a management buy-out (MBO) process that was highly effective. Further analysis of a firm called Jenoptik, which was successfully bailed out, is incorporated as to draw implications of its accomplishments.
In the section on migration, we examine how the gap between the unemployment rates in the West and East have narrowed as the population flow shifted from the West to East. Consequently, there was no significant deviation in terms of the Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) per capita in each state of East Germany. However, as the labor market stabilized in East Germany and population flows have weakened, the deviation will become larger. Meanwhile, if we make a prediction about the movement of population between the North and the South, which show a remarkable difference in their economic circumstances, a radical reunification process such as Germany’s case would force 7% of the population of the North to move towards the South. Upon reunification, the estimated unemployment rate in North Korea would remain at least 30% for the time being. In order to reduce the initial unemployment rate, it is crucial to design a program that trains the unemployed and to build a system that predicts changes in labor demand.
It seems nearly impossible to apply the social safety nets of the South to the North, as there is a systemic difference in ideologies. Taking steps toward integration would be the most suitable option in the case of the Koreas. We propose to build a sound groundwork for stabilizing the interest rates and exchange rates, maintain stable fiscal policies, raise momentum for economic growth and make sure people understand the means required to financially support the North in order to reduce the gap between the two.
This book was jointly organized and edited by Dr. Hyung-gon Jeong of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) and Dr. Gerhard Heimpold of the Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH). We believe that this report, which examines numerous social and economic agendas that emerged during the reunification of Germany, will provide truly important reference for both Koreas. It is also our view that it will serve as a stepping-stone to establish policies in regard to South-North exchanges across numerous sectors prior to discussions of reunification. KIEP will continue to work with IWH and contribute its expertise to the establishment of grounds for unification policies.
Artikel Lesen
On the Distribution of Refugees in the EU
Oliver Holtemöller, Axel Lindner, Andreas Schmalzbauer, Götz Zeddies
Intereconomics,
Nr. 4,
2016
Abstract
The current situation regarding the migration of refugees can only be handled efficiently through closer international cooperation in the field of asylum policy. From an economic point of view, it would be reasonable to distribute incoming refugees among all EU countries according to a distribution key that reflects differences in the costs of integration in the individual countries. An efficient distribution would even out the marginal costs of integrating refugees. In order to reach a political agreement, the key for distributing refugees should be complemented by compensation payments that distribute the costs of integration among countries. The key for distributing refugees presented by the EU Commission takes account of appropriate factors in principle, but it is unclear in terms of detail. The compensation payments for countries that should take relatively high numbers of refugees for cost efficiency reasons should be financed by reallocating resources within the EU budget.
Artikel Lesen
Zur Wirtschaftspolitik: Ökonomische Überlegungen zur Verteilung von Flüchtlingen und zur Finanzierung der Kosten der Flüchtlingsmigration in der EU
Martin Altemeyer-Bartscher, Oliver Holtemöller, Axel Lindner, Andreas Schmalzbauer, Götz Zeddies
Konjunktur aktuell,
Nr. 5,
2015
Abstract
Die aktuelle Fluchtmigration kann nur durch engere internationale Kooperation auf dem Gebiet der Asylpolitik effizient bewältigt werden. Aus ökonomischer Perspektive wäre es sinnvoll, die ankommenden Flüchtlinge nach einem Verteilungsschlüssel auf alle EU-Länder zu verteilen. Dieser Verteilungsschlüssel sollte widerspiegeln, dass die Integrationskosten in den einzelnen Ländern unterschiedlich ausfallen. Effizient ist eine Verteilung, die die Kosten für die Integration zusätzlicher Flüchtlinge – auch unter Berücksichtigung positiver Effekte etwa auf das Erwerbspersonenpotenzial in alternden und schrumpfenden Gesellschaften – nivelliert. Die Kosten zusätzlicher Integration dürften allerdings nicht automatisch dort am niedrigsten sein, wo die ökonomische Leistungsfähigkeit am höchsten ist. Ferner sind die einzelnen Länder gegenwärtig sehr unterschiedlich betroffen. Um eine politische Einigung zu erzielen, ist neben einem Verteilungsschlüssel für die Personen auch ein Verteilungsschlüssel für die Kosten erforderlich, der sich an der Leistungsfähigkeit der Länder und an dem Umfang der positiven externen Effekte orientiert, von denen Länder profitieren, die vergleichsweise wenige Flüchtlinge aufnehmen. Der von der EU-Kommission vorgelegte Verteilungsschlüssel greift prinzipiell die richtigen Faktoren auf, ist jedoch im Detail intransparent und könnte verbessert werden. Die Kompensationszahlungen an Länder, die aus Gründen der Kosteneffizienz relativ viele Flüchtlinge gemäß dem Verteilungsschlüssel aufnehmen, sollten durch Umschichtungen innerhalb des EU-Haushalts finanziert werden.
Artikel Lesen
Internationale und regionale Arbeitsmobilität: Bericht zum 10. IWH-IAB-Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik
Birgit Schultz, A. Smigiel
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 6,
2013
Abstract
Auf dem IWH-IAB-Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik am 17. und 18. Oktober 2013 in Halle (Saale) trafen sich zum nunmehr zehnten Mal Vertreter aus Wissenschaft, Politik, Verwaltung und Wirtschaft, um über neue Entwicklungen und Erkenntnisse zum Thema „Internationale und regionale Arbeitsmobilität“ zu diskutieren. Der Schwerpunkt der Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge lag auf den speziellen Problemen der Zuwanderung aus dem Ausland und den damit verbundenen Herausforderungen.
Artikel Lesen
Im Fokus: Potenziale qualifizierter Zuwanderung nach Ostdeutschland
Alexander Kubis
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 4,
2011
Abstract
Für die ostdeutsche Arbeitskräftenachfrage lässt sich auf Basis der demographischen Prognosen ein Engpass im Bereich des mittleren und hohen Qualifikationsniveaus vorhersagen, der nicht allein durch ein bisher nicht ausgeschöpftes Arbeitskräfteangebot gedeckt werden kann, sondern auch einer qualifizierten Zuwanderung bedarf. Der Beitrag beschreibt die verschiedenen möglichen Wege qualifizierter Zuwanderung nach Ostdeutschland:
internationale Zuwanderung von außerhalb und innerhalb der Europäischen Union sowie nationale Binnenzuwanderung aus Westdeutschland. Ein Schwerpunkt untersucht die Auswirkungen der vollständigen Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit für polnische Staatsbürger zum 1. Mai 2011. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Emigranten aus dem Zusammenspiel von wirtschaftlicher Leistungsfähigkeit und bestehenden Netzwerken in der Zielregion Vorteile ziehen. Deshalb werden voraussichtlich vor allem die westdeutschen Wirtschaftszentren von einem ansteigenden polnischen Migrationsstrom profitieren. Die ostdeutschen Länder werden vielfach nur als Durchgangsregionen fungieren.
Artikel Lesen
Korean Unification and Banking System - An Analysis in View of German Experiences and Korean Differences
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 139,
2001
Abstract
One of the reforms that have to be launched in a future unification process in Korea, which seems possible after the political negotiations last year, is the transformation of the North Korean banking system. The question arises whether Korea could profit from the German experience where banking transformation was one of the rather few success stories in unification. In 1990 the East German banking transformation was achieved relatively fast and uncomplicated due to considerable direct investments of the West German banks compounded with state guarantees for bad loans resulting from the credit business with existing GDR-corporations. Unfortunately, South Korea currently lacks some major prerequesites that contributed to the German banking unification, among them – and probably the most important one – is the lack of a sound and efficient banking
system that could become active in the North. Consequently, depending on the circumstances of a future Korean unification either a more gradual process is recommended or, if inner-Korean migration requires a more dynamic transition, considerable investment by foreign banks and assistance from international organisations is recommended.
Artikel Lesen
