IWH-Subventionsdatenbank
IWH-Subventionsdatenbank Die Mikrodatenbank umfasst zurzeit neun Datensätze zu Programmen direkter Unternehmenssubventionen in Deutschland. Die von den Projektträgern und den…
Zur Seite
IWH-Bauumfrage
IWH-Bauumfrage Das IWH führte seit dem Jahr 1993 bis zum ersten Quartal 2017 regelmäßig Unternehmensumfragen durch, mit denen Entwicklungstendenzen in der Industrie und dem…
Zur Seite
Management-Buy-Outs
Management-Buy-Outs in Ostdeutschland Die Studie über Management-Buy-Outs (MBOs) untersucht einen wichtigen Teil des ostdeutschen Unternehmensbestands: Unternehmen, die im Zuge…
Zur Seite
CompNet Database
The CompNet Competitiveness Database The Competitiveness Research Network (CompNet) is a forum for high level research and policy analysis in the areas of competitiveness and…
Zur Seite
IWH-Infothek
IWH-Infothek Vorstandsmitteilungen Logout Forschung IWH-DPE Chancengleichheit und Diversität Kommunikation IT-Informationen Bibliothek Personal Finanzen Drittmittel…
Zur Seite
Zentrum für evidenzbasierte Politikberatung
Zentrum für evidenzbasierte Politikberatung (IWH-CEP) Das Zentrum für evidenzbasierte Politikberatung des IWH (IWH-CEP) wurde im Jahr 2014 gegründet. Die Plattform bündelt und…
Zur Seite
Barrierefreiheit
Erklärung zur Barrierefreiheit Das Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) ist bemüht, seinen Internetauftritt www.iwh-halle.de im Einklang mit den nationalen…
Zur Seite
Information about Inequality in Early Child Care Reduces Polarization in Policy Preferences
Henning Hermes, Philipp Lergetporer, Fabian Mierisch, Guido Schwerdt, Simon Wiederhold
Abstract
We investigate public preferences for equity-enhancing policies in access to early child care, using a survey experiment with a representative sample of the German population (n ≈ 4, 800). We observe strong misperceptions about migrant-native inequalities in early child care that vary by respondents’ age and right-wing voting preferences. Randomly providing information about the actual extent of inequalities has a nuanced impact on the support for equity-enhancing policy reforms: it increases support for respondents who initially underestimated these inequalities, and tends to decrease support for those who initially overestimated them. This asymmetric effect leads to a more consensual policy view, substantially decreasing the polarization in policy support between under- and overestimators. Our results suggest that correcting misperceptions can align public policy preferences, potentially leading to less polarized debates about how to address inequalities and discrimination.
Artikel Lesen
Income Shocks, Political Support and Voting Behaviour
Richard Upward, Peter Wright
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 1,
2024
Abstract
We provide new evidence on the effects of economic shocks on political support, voting behaviour and political opinions over the last 25 years. We exploit a sudden, large and long-lasting shock in the form of job loss and trace out its impact on individual political outcomes for up to 10 years after the event. The availability of detailed information on households before and after the job loss event allows us to reweight a comparison group to closely mimic the job losers in terms of their observable characteristics, pre-existing political support and voting behaviour. We find consistent, long-lasting but quantitatively small effects on support and votes for the incumbent party, and short-lived effects on political engagement. We find limited impact on the support for fringe or populist parties. In the context of Brexit, opposition to the EU was much higher amongst those who lost their jobs, but this was largely due to pre-existing differences which were not exacerbated by the job loss event itself.
Artikel Lesen
Does Information about Inequality and Discrimination in Early Child Care Affect Policy Preferences?
Henning Hermes, Philipp Lergetporer, Fabian Mierisch, Guido Schwerdt, Simon Wiederhold
CESifo Working Paper,
Nr. 10925,
2024
Abstract
We investigate public preferences for equity-enhancing policies in access to early child care, using a survey experiment with a representative sample of the German population (n ≈ 4, 800). We observe strong misperceptions about migrant-native inequalities in early child care that vary by respondents’ age and right-wing voting preferences. Randomly providing information about the actual extent of inequalities has a nuanced impact on the support for equity-enhancing policy reforms: it increases support for respondents who initially underestimated these inequalities, and tends to decrease support for those who initially overestimated them. This asymmetric effect leads to a more consensual policy view, substantially decreasing the polarization in policy support between under- and overestimators. Our results suggest that correcting misperceptions can align public policy preferences, potentially leading to less polarized debates about how to address inequalities and discrimination.
Artikel Lesen
