26.06.2014 • 18/2014
Kernkapitalquoten deutscher Banken seit der Finanzkrise angestiegen
Seit der Finanzkrise haben die deutschen Banken ihre Kernkapitalquote im Zeitverlauf deutlich erhöht. Dies zeigt eine Auswertung der Geschäfts- bzw. Finanzberichte ausgewählter Finanzinstitute durch das IWH. Der Aufwärtstrend setzte sich mit wenigen Ausnahmen bis zum vierten Quartal 2013 fort. Diese Entwicklung ist vermutlich auch auf die Anforderungen der EU-Stresstests zurückzuführen. Nur jene Banken hatten den Stresstest bestanden, die nach Abzug der simulierten Verluste mindestens eine harte Kernkapitalquote von 6% (im Jahr 2010) bzw. 5% (2011) aufweisen konnten. Jüngste Daten der privaten Geschäftsbanken weisen für das erste Quartal 2014 allerdings einen Rückgang der Quoten aus. Da nicht die aktuellen Zahlen, sondern die des vierten Quartals 2013 in die aktuelle Bilanzqualitätsprüfung (Asset Quality Review) der Europäischen Zentralbank und den sich anschließenden erneuten Stresstest eingehen, scheint für die Banken aktuell kein Anreiz zu bestehen, die Kernkapitalquoten auf dem hohen Niveau zu belassen.
Felix Noth
Pressemitteilung herunterladen
Taxing Banks: An Evaluation of the German Bank Levy
Claudia M. Buch, Björn Hilberg, Lena Tonzer
Abstract
Bank distress can have severe negative consequences for the stability of the financial system, the real economy, and public finances. Regimes for restructuring and restoring banks financed by bank levies and fiscal backstops seek to reduce these costs. Bank levies attempt to internalize systemic risk and increase the costs of leverage. This paper evaluates the effects of the German bank levy implemented in 2011 as part of the German bank restructuring law. Our analysis offers three main insights. First, revenues raised through the bank levy are minimal, because of low tax rates and high thresholds for tax exemptions. Second, the bulk of the payments were contributed by large commercial banks and the head institutes of savings banks and credit unions. Third, the levy had no effect on the volume of loans or interest rates for the average German bank. For the banks affected most by the levy, we find evidence of fewer loans, higher lending rates, and lower deposit rates.
Artikel Lesen
Spillover Effects among Financial Institutions: A State-dependent Sensitivity Value-at-Risk Approach
Z. Adams, R. Füss, Reint E. Gropp
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
Nr. 3,
2014
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a state-dependent sensitivity value-at-risk (SDSVaR) approach that enables us to quantify the direction, size, and duration of risk spillovers among financial institutions as a function of the state of financial markets (tranquil, normal, and volatile). For four sets of major financial institutions (commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies) we show that while small during normal times, equivalent shocks lead to considerable spillover effects in volatile market periods. Commercial banks and, especially, hedge funds appear to play a major role in the transmission of shocks to other financial institutions.
Artikel Lesen
Macroeconomic Factors and Microlevel Bank Behavior
Claudia M. Buch, S. Eickmeier, Esteban Prieto
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,
Nr. 4,
2014
Abstract
We analyze the link between banks and the macroeconomy using a model that extends a macroeconomic VAR for the U.S. with a set of factors summarizing conditions in about 1,500 commercial banks. We investigate how macroeconomic shocks are transmitted to individual banks and obtain the following main findings. Backward-looking risk of a representative bank declines, and bank lending increases following expansionary shocks. Forward-looking risk increases following an expansionary monetary policy shock. There is, however, substantial heterogeneity in the transmission of macroeconomic shocks, which is due to bank size, capitalization, liquidity, risk, and the exposure to real estate and consumer loans.
Artikel Lesen
Changing Forces of Gravity: How the Crisis Affected International Banking
Claudia M. Buch, Katja Neugebauer, Christoph Schröder
ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 14-006,
2014
Abstract
The global financial crisis has brought to an end a rather unprecedented period of banks’ international expansion. We analyze the effects of the crisis on international banking. Using a detailed dataset on the international assets of all German banks with foreign affiliates for the years 2002-2011, we study bank internationalization before and during the crisis. Our data allow analyzing not only the international assets of the banks’ headquarters but also of their foreign affiliates. We show that banks have lowered their international assets, both along the extensive and the intensive margin. This withdrawal from foreign markets is the result of changing market conditions, of policy interventions, and of a weakly increasing sensitivity of banks to financial frictions.
Artikel Lesen
The Impact of Public Guarantees on Bank Risk-taking: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Reint E. Gropp, C. Gruendl, Andre Guettler
Review of Finance,
Nr. 2,
2014
Abstract
In 2001, government guarantees for savings banks in Germany were removed following a lawsuit. We use this natural experiment to examine the effect of government guarantees on bank risk-taking. The results suggest that banks whose government guarantee was removed reduced credit risk by cutting off the riskiest borrowers from credit. Using a difference-in-differences approach we show that none of these effects are present in a control group of German banks to whom the guarantee was not applicable. Furthermore, savings banks adjusted their liabilities away from risk-sensitive debt instruments after the removal of the guarantee, while we do not observe this for the control group. We also document that yield spreads of savings banks’ bonds increased significantly right after the announcement of the decision to remove guarantees, while the yield spread of a sample of bonds issued by the control group remained unchanged. The evidence implies that public guarantees may be associated with substantial moral hazard effects.
Artikel Lesen
Do Better Capitalized Banks Lend Less? Long-run Panel Evidence from Germany
Claudia M. Buch, Esteban Prieto
International Finance,
Nr. 1,
2014
Abstract
Higher capital features prominently in proposals for regulatory reform. But how does increased bank capital affect business loans? The real costs of increased bank capital in terms of reduced loans are widely believed to be substantial. But the negative real-sector implications need not be severe. In this paper, we take a long-run perspective by analysing the link between the capitalization of the banking sector and bank loans using panel cointegration models. We study the evolution of the German economy for the past 44 years. Higher bank capital tends to be associated with higher business loan volume, and we find no evidence for a negative effect. This result holds both for pooled regressions as well as for the individual banking groups in Germany.
Artikel Lesen
How Important are Hedge Funds in a Crisis?
Reint E. Gropp
FRBSF Economic Letters,
Nr. 11,
2014
Abstract
Before the 2007–09 crisis, standard risk measurement methods substantially underestimated the threat to the financial system. One reason was that these methods didn’t account for how closely commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies were linked. As financial conditions worsened in one type of institution, the effects spread to others. A new method that more accurately accounts for these spillover effects suggests that hedge funds may have been central in generating systemic risk during the crisis.
Artikel Lesen
Regional House Price Dynamics and Voting Behavior in the FOMC
Stefan Eichler, Tom Lähner
Economic Inquiry,
Nr. 2,
2014
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of house price gaps in Federal Reserve districts on the voting behavior in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) from 1978 to 2010. Applying a random effects ordered probit model, we find that a higher regional house price gap significantly increases (decreases) the probability that this district's representative in the FOMC casts interest rate votes in favor of tighter (easier) monetary policy. In addition, our results suggest that Bank presidents react more sensitively to regional house price developments than Board members do.
Artikel Lesen
24.03.2014 • 11/2014
IWH gut aufgestellt: Vorstandsrat trifft wichtige Entscheidungen
Der Vorstandsrat des Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) hat in seiner heutigen Sitzung die Weichen für die Zeit nach dem Wechsel der IWH-Präsidentin Claudia Buch zur Bundesbank gestellt. Der Leiter der Abteilung Makroökonomik, Oliver Holtemöller, wurde in den Vorstand gewählt. Höchste Priorität hat für den Vorstandsrat eine zügige Regelung der Präsidentschaftsnachfolge. Die Präsidentschaft des IWH wird als gemeinsame Berufung mit der Universität Magdeburg in Kürze ausgeschrieben. Zur Ende 2014 anstehenden Evaluierung durch die Leibniz-Gemeinschaft soll bereits eine designierte Präsidentschaftsnachfolge das erfolgversprechende Zukunftskonzept des IWH vertreten können.
Pressemitteilung herunterladen