Loan rates for seemingly identical borrowers often exhibit substantial dispersion. This paper investigates the determinants of the dispersion in interest rates on loans granted by banks to small and medium sized enterprises. We associate this dispersion with the loan officers’ use of “discretion” in the loan rate setting process. We find that “discretion” is most important if: (i) loans are small and unsecured; (ii) firms are small and opaque; (iii) the firm operates in a large and highly concentrated banking market; and (iv) the firm is distantly located from the lender. Consistent with the proliferation of information-technologies in the banking industry, we find a decreasing role for “discretion” over time in the provision of small credits to opaque firms. While widely used in the pricing of loans, “discretion” plays only a minor role in the decisions to grant loans.

The aim of this study is to assess the contributions of investment banking to the economy with a particular focus on the German economy. To this end we analyse both the economic benefits and the costs stemming from investment banking.

The study focuses on investment banks as this part of banking is particularly relevant for financing companies as well as the development and use of specific products to support the needs of private and professional clients. The assessment of benefits and costs of investment banking has been conducted from a European perspective. Nevertheless there is a focus on the German economy to allow a more detailed analysis of certain aspects as for example the use of derivatives by German companies, the success of M&As in Germany or the effect of securitization on loan supply and GDP in Germany. For comparison purposes other European countries and also the U.S. have been taken into account.

The last financial crisis has shown the negative impacts of banks on the financial system and the whole economy. In a study on the contribution of investment banks to systemic risk we quantify the negative side of the investment banking business.

In the last part of the study we assess how the effects of regulatory changes on investment banking. All important changes in banking and capital market regulation are taken into account such as Basel III, additional capital requirements for systemically important financial institutions, regulation of OTC derivatives and specific taxes.

Im Sommer 2011 haben sich die Aussichten für die Weltwirtschaft deutlich verschlechtert. Insbesondere droht in Europa die Staatsschuldenkrise sich zu einer Bankenkrise auszuweiten. Dies belastet zunehmend auch die deutsche Konjunktur. Die stark erhöhte Unsicherheit wird die inländische Nachfrage dämpfen, und der Außenhandel dürfte aufgrund der schwierigen Lage wichtiger Handelspartner nicht mehr zur Expansion beitragen. Die Institute erwarten, dass das Bruttoinlandsprodukt in diesem Jahr um 2,9 % und im kommenden lediglich um 0,8 % zunimmt. Die Arbeitslosenquote dürfte nur noch wenig zurückgehen von 7,0 % auf 6,7 % im Jahr 2012. Die Inflationsrate von voraussichtlich 2,3 % im Jahr 2011 und 1,8 % im Jahr 2012 wird mehr und mehr vom inländischen Preisauftrieb bestimmt. Das Budgetdefizit des Staates wird auf 0,9 % in Relation zum Bruttoinlandsprodukt in diesem Jahr und auf 0,6 % im kommenden Jahr zurückgehen.

Drei Jahre nach dem Beginn der schwersten Rezession der Nachkriegsgeschichte steht die Wirtschaft des Euroraums vor einer erneuten Rezession; die Konjunktur in Deutschland gerät aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach in eine Phase der Stagnation. Nach der hier vorgelegten Prognose wird die gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktion in Deutschland in beiden Quartalen des Winterhalbjahres 2011/2012 leicht sinken; die technische Bedingung für eine Rezession wäre damit auch hier erfüllt.

Eine langsamere Gangart der Konjunktur ab dem zweiten Halbjahr 2011 war schon im Frühjahr weithin erwartet worden. In den vergangenen Wochen hat die Abschwächung jedoch eine neue Qualität bekommen. Die Aktienkurse sind rund um den Globus massiv eingebrochen und zeigen deutlich erhöhte Schwankungen. Gleichzeitig haben sich die Vertrauensindikatoren weltweit stark verschlechtert, zuletzt insbesondere auch in Deutschland. Der Vertrauensverlust setzte ein, während in den USA um die Ausweitung der Obergrenze für Bundesschulden und in der Europäischen Union um ein neues Hilfspaket für Griechenland sowie eine Reform des Rettungsfonds gerungen wurde. Die Ende Juli ausgehandelten Kompromisse wurden weder diesseits noch jenseits des Atlantiks als Befreiungsschläge aus den fiskalpolitischen Krisen aufgefasst und konnten deshalb die Stimmungseinbrüche nicht aufhalten. Stattdessen hat sich die Situation im Euroraum in den vergangenen Wochen weiter zugespitzt, weil an den Finanzmärkten Zweifel an der Zahlungsfähigkeit der großen Schuldenländer Spanien und vor allem Italien größer geworden sind. Zwar konnte die Europäische Zentralbank eine deutliche Erhöhung der Risikoaufschläge italienischer und spanischer Staatsanleihen durch eine Ausweitung ihres Ankaufprogramms verhindern, eine langfristige Lösung für die Schuldenpro¬blematik ist dies jedoch nicht.

State-controlled banks are currently at the core of financial intermediation in Russia. This paper aims to assess the magnitude of government banking, and to reveal some of its special features and arrangements. We distinguish between directly and indirectly state-controlled banks and construct a set of bank-level statistical data covering the period between 2000 and 2011. By January 2011 the market share of state-controlled banks reached almost 54 percent of all bank assets, putting Russia in the same league with China and India and widening the gap from typical European emerging markets. We show that direct state ownership is gradually substituted by indirect ownership and control. It tends to be organized in corporate pyramids that dilute public property, take control away from government bodies, and underpin managerial opportunism. Statecontrolled

banks blur the borderline between commercial banking and development

banking. Dominance of public banks has a bearing on empirical studies whose results might suggest state-owned banks’ greater (or lesser) efficiency or competitiveness compared to other forms of ownership. We tend to interpret such results as influenced by the choice of indicator, period of observations, sample selection, etc., in the absence of an equal playing field for all groups of players. We suggest that the government’s planned retreat from the banking sector will involve non-core assets mainly, whereas control over core institutions will just become more subtle.

Governments often justify interventions into the financial system in the form of bail outs or liquidity assistance with the systemic importance of large banks for the real economy. In this paper, we analyze whether idiosyncratic shocks to loan growth at large banks have effects on real GDP growth. We employ a measure of idiosyncratic shocks which follows Gabaix (forthcoming). He shows that idiosyncratic shocks to large firms have an impact on US GDP growth. In an application to the banking sector, we find evidence that changes in lending by large banks have a significant short-run impact on GDP growth. Episodes of negative loan growth rates and the Eastern European countries in our sample drive these results.

This study deals with the question whether the central banks of Sweden, Denmark and the UK can really influence short-term money markets and thus, would lose this influence in case of Euro adoption. We use a GARCH-M-GED model with daily money market rates. The model reveals the co-movement between the Euribor and the shortterm interest rates in these three countries. A high degree of co-movement might be seen as an argument for a weak impact of the central bank on its money markets. But this argument might only hold for tranquil times. Our approach reveals, in addition, whether there is a specific reaction of the money markets in turbulent times. Our finding is that the policy of the European Central Bank (ECB) has indeed a significant impact on the three money market rates, and there is no specific benefit for these countries to stay outside the Euro area. However, the GARCH-M-GED model further reveals risk divergence and unstable volatilities of risk in the case of adverse monetary shocks to the economy for Sweden and Denmark, compared to the Euro area. We conclude that the danger of adverse monetary developments cannot be addressed by a common monetary

policy for these both countries, and this can be seen as an argument to stay outside the Euro area.

We study whether ADR (American depositary receipt) investors perceive the risk that countries such as Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal or Spain could leave the eurozone to address financial problems produced by the sub-prime crisis. Using daily data, we analyse the impact of vulnerability measures related to currency crisis theories on ADR returns. We find that ADR returns fall when yield spreads of sovereign bonds or CDSs (credit default swaps) rise (i.e. when debt crisis risk increases); when banks' CDS premiums rise or stock returns fall (i.e. when banking crisis risk increases); or when the euro's overvaluation increases (i.e. when the risk of competitive devaluation increases).

The focus of this article is the empirical identification of factors influencing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in transition economies on a regional level (NUTS 2). The analysis is designed as benchmark between three neighboring post-communist regions, i.e. East Germany, the Czech Republic and Poland. Their different transition paths have not only resulted in economic differences. We can also observe today that the importance of pull factors for FDI varies significantly across the regions. This analysis shows that in comparison with Poland and the Czech Republic, East Germany’s major benefit is its purchasing power, its geographical proximity to West European markets, and its modern infrastructure. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that intra-industry linkages such as specialization and agglomeration economies are relevant factors for the location decision of foreign investors. This result can help to explain the regional divergence of FDI streams in transition economies.