18.08.2020 • 16/2020
IWH-Gutachten: Regionalförderung wirkt, sollte aber weiter verbessert werden
Deutschlands wichtigstes Instrument der Regionalpolitik fördert Arbeitsplätze, erhöht Betriebsumsätze und moderat auch die Löhne; es hat jedoch keine positiven Effekte auf die Produktivität. Das zeigt ein Gutachten zur Wirkung der Bund-Länder-Gemeinschaftsaufgabe „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur“ (GRW), verfasst vom Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH). Daher empfehlen die Ökonomen, die Förderziele stärker auf die Produktivität auszurichten, denn nur so kann das Förderziel, dass die geförderten Regionen wirtschaftlich aufholen, erreicht werden.
Read press release
Establishing Evidence-based Evaluation Methods for Subsidy Programmes in Germany (EVA-KULT)
EVA-KULT Establishing Evidence-based Evaluation Methods for Subsidy Programmes in...
See page
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice (IWH-CEP) ...
See page
Contact
Contact Get a quick overview of how to reach us and whom to contact: Postal...
See page
Measuring Regionalized Knowledge Generation and Transfer – A Feasibility Study Using a Multi-layer Approach in the Free State of Saxony
Mirko Titze, Matthias Brachert, Jutta Günther, Michael Schwartz
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 5,
2010
Abstract
Economic literature regards knowledge creation and learning as critical elements for gaining competitive advantage of regions. However, recognizing the importance of innovation and knowledge creation to economic success is far from being novel. Original is the view of increasing importance of knowledge creation for speeding up the depreciation of existing knowledge stocks. This puts a high pressure on regional actors to constantly participate in innovation processes to maintain their competitive advantages. Against this background, regional actors – if they aim to be successful in the globalized economy – first require access to a comprehensive and diversified knowledge base. Second, they need to participate in the processes of knowledge generation and knowledge transfer. Thereby, systemic innovation theory has pronounced the view that the locus of innovation and knowledge creation resides not only within the boundaries of the regional actors, such as private firms, universities, research laboratories, suppliers, and customers, but is the result of an interdependent exchange process between these different types. Collaborative interactions, bringing together different types of actors, may therefore lie well at the heart of accelerated knowledge creation and learning at the regional level (Lundvall and Johnson 1994).
Read article
