Sind Subventionen für Halbleiter zu rechtfertigen?
Reint E. Gropp, Alexander Reifschneider
Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik,
No. 2,
2023
Abstract
Reint Gropp und Alexander Reifschneider beleuchten in diesem Artikel die wichtigsten Argumente für und gegen die Subventionen, die im Rahmen des European Chips Acts für Halbleiter in Europa und in Deutschland geplant sind. Sie gehen dabei auch auf die geostrategischen Argumente ein. Es zeigt sich, dass die Subventionen für Produktionsanlagen für Halbleiter sehr schwer zu rechtfertigen sind. Subventionen für Forschung und Entwicklung statt für Produktion wären eine bessere Verwendung von Steuergeldern.
Read article
East Germany
The Nasty Gap 30 years after unification: Why East Germany is still 20% poorer than the...
See page
Revoking COVID 19 measures
Revoking COVID-19 measures from Michael Koetter, March 18, 2022 Dear all, On March 20, the national Corona rules will be revoked, including the obligation to work...
See page
Archive
Media Response Archive ...
See page
IWH FDI Micro Database
IWH FDI Micro Database The IWH FDI Micro Database (FDI = Foreign Direct...
See page
Alumni
IWH Alumni The IWH would like to stay in contact with its former employees. We...
See page
Micro-mechanisms behind Declining Labor Shares: Rising Market Power and Changing Modes of Production
Matthias Mertens
International Journal of Industrial Organization,
March
2022
Abstract
I derive a micro-founded framework showing how rising firm market power on product and labor markets and falling aggregate labor output elasticities provide three competing explanations for falling labor shares. I apply my framework to 20 years of German manufacturing sector micro data containing firm-specific price information to study these three distinct drivers of declining labor shares. I document a severe increase in firms’ labor market power, whereas firms’ product market power stayed comparably low. Changes in firm market power and a falling aggregate labor output elasticity each account for one half of the decline in labor's share.
Read article
The East-West German Gap in Revenue Productivity: Just a Tale of Output Prices?
Matthias Mertens, Steffen Müller
Abstract
East German manufacturers’ revenue productivity (value-added per worker) is some 8 (25) percent below West German levels, even three decades after German unification. Using firm-product-level data containing information on product quantities and prices, we analyse the role of product specialisation and reject the prominent ‚extended work bench hypothesis‘, stating a specialisation of Eastern firms in the intermediate input production as explanation for these sustained productivity differences. We decompose the East’s revenue productivity disadvantage into Eastern firms selling at lower prices and producing more physical output for given amounts of inputs within ten-digit product industries. This suggests that Eastern firms specialise vertically in simpler product varieties generating less consumer value but being manufactured with less or cheaper inputs. Vertical specialisation, however, does not explain the productivity gap as Eastern firms are physically less productive for given product prices, implying a genuine physical productivity disadvantage of Eastern compared to Western firms
Read article
The East-West German Gap in Revenue Productivity: Just a Tale of Output Prices?
Matthias Mertens, Steffen Müller
Abstract
East German manufacturers’ revenue productivity (value-added per worker) is some 8 (25) percent below West German levels, even three decades after German unification. Using firm-product-level data containing information on product quantities and prices, we analyse the role of product specialisation and reject the prominent ‚extended work bench hypothesis‘, stating a specialisation of Eastern firms in the intermediate input production as explanation for these sustained productivity differences. We decompose the East’s revenue productivity disadvantage into Eastern firms selling at lower prices and producing more physical output for given amounts of inputs within ten-digit product industries. This suggests that Eastern firms specialise vertically in simpler product varieties generating less consumer value but being manufactured with less or cheaper inputs. Vertical specialisation, however, does not explain the productivity gap as Eastern firms are physically less productive for given product prices, implying a genuine physical productivity disadvantage of Eastern compared to Western firms.
Read article
