MICROPROD Raising EU Productivity: Lessons from Improved Micro Data The goal...
IWH at 2020 ASSA Annual Meeting in San Diego
IWH at 2020 ASSA Annual Meeting in San Diego Next year’s 2020 ASSA Annual Meeting...
Establishing Evidence-based Evaluation Methods for Subsidy Programmes in Germany (EVA-KULT)
Establishing Evidence-based Evaluation Methods for Subsidy Programmes in Germany (EVA-KULT) ...
Reports of the European Forecasting Network (EFN)
Reports of the European Forecasting Network (EFN) The European Forecasting...
Social Mobility Equal opportunities for everyone Dossier ...
European Firms after the Crisis – New Insights from the 5th Vintage of the CompNet Firm-level-based Database ...
IWH-CompNet Discussion Papers
IWH-CompNet Discussion Papers The IWH-CompNet Discussion Paper series presents research...
Membership Five Good Reasons for Becoming a Member of the Halle Institute for...
Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth
American Economic Review,
We build a model of firm-level innovation, productivity growth, and reallocation featuring endogenous entry and exit. A new and central economic force is the selection between high- and low-type firms, which differ in terms of their innovative capacity. We estimate the parameters of the model using US Census microdata on firm-level output, R&D, and patenting. The model provides a good fit to the dynamics of firm entry and exit, output, and R&D. Taxing the continued operation of incumbents can lead to sizable gains (of the order of 1.4 percent improvement in welfare) by encouraging exit of less productive firms and freeing up skilled labor to be used for R&D by high-type incumbents. Subsidies to the R&D of incumbents do not achieve this objective because they encourage the survival and expansion of low-type firms.