Proximity and the Transfer of Academic Knowledge: Evidence from the Spatial Pattern of Industry Collaborations of East German Professors
Viktor Slavtchev
Regional Studies,
No. 5,
2013
Abstract
Proximity and the transfer of academic knowledge: evidence from the spatial pattern of industry collaborations of East German professors, Regional Studies. Universities can stimulate local economic development, particularly due to collaboration with local industry. Against this background, this study analyses when these interactions are local. Previous research suggests that university–industry linkages are mainly local because of tacit knowledge and the importance of physical proximity. This study provides additional evidence that the spatial pattern of university–industry linkages is a result of a complex matching process of appropriate partners. The results indicate that actors' individual and relational characteristics, institutional factors, and the particular type of knowledge play a role in collaboration. Hence, university–industry collaborations might not be local.
Read article
Business Networks in the Leipzig, Dresden, Chemnitz and Halle Regions: Do Member Firms Locate in Spatial Proximity?
Gerhard Heimpold
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2010
Abstract
The business landscape in East Germany mainly consists of small and medium-sized firms. This in mind, business networks may contribute to an improvement of the economic performance of firms which collaborate in business networks. For successful networking a mix of network members being locally concentrated on the one side and of partners from distant regions, especially from abroad, on the other side, is important. In regional economics, this duality is highlighted for two reasons: personal contacts of partners which are located in spatial proximity to each other may ease the transfer of tacit knowledge. The flow of tacit knowledge can be regarded as a factor which enhances innovation processes. However, the inclusion of partners from abroad is important, too. It facilitates access to the most advanced knowledge and technologies worldwide. The academic debate on networking regards a one-sided orientation on the local dimension of networking as risky due to possible lock-in effects. The empirical findings for 93 business networks existing in the regions of Leipzig, Dresden, Chemnitz and Halle, which are located in the southern part of East Germany, reveal a great proportion of network members concentrated locally: On average, this is the case with more than 50% of the network members. 10% of members are located in the other three city regions mentioned. More than one third of firms are located outside, in other German regions, of which around the half in the states of Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt. A minority of 2% is located abroad. However, for the transfer of externally existing knowledge other network members may be relevant, too. To illustrate: More than four fifths of the networks under investigation include public research units (universities etc.) which usually play an important role when it comes to an inter-regional and international knowledge transfer.
Read article
Was bringt die Wissenschaft für die Wirtschaft in einer Region? Regionale Innovations-, Wachstums- und Einkommenseffekte von öffentlichen Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen am Beispiel der Region Halle
Peter Franz, Diana Roth, Martin T. W. Rosenfeld
Schriften des IWH,
No. 18,
2004
Abstract
In neueren regionalökonomischen Theorien wird davon ausgegangen, dass die räumliche Nähe sowie Netzwerkbeziehungen zwischen den Unternehmen und anderen Akteu-ren in einer Region eine erhebliche Rolle für regionale Innovations- und Wachstumsprozesse spielen. Als „andere Akteure“ werden nicht zuletzt die öffentlichen Wissen-schaftseinrichtungen (Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen) angeführt. Wissenschaftseinrichtungen sind vor allem deshalb für regionale Entwicklungsprozesse von Bedeutung, weil sie zwei Faktoren relativ unmittelbar beeinflussen können, denen heute ein entscheidender Einfluss auf die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung beigemessen wird. Diese Faktoren sind das Humankapital (in der Gestalt von Absolventen der Hochschulen sowie der an den Wissenschaftseinrichtungen tätigen Wissenschaftler) und das von den Wissenschaftseinrichtungen produzierte Wissen, insbesondere das nicht-kodifizierte Wissen („tacit knowledge“), das an die Person eines Forschers und damit an seinen Standort gebunden ist.
Read article