Search Results

All
Data Type
Topic
Year
Refresh

EFN Report Spring 2015: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2015 and 2016

EFN Reports, No. 2, 2015
Abstract
Recent movements on world markets for commodities, currencies and capital stimulate the world economy, but they entail also considerable risks: income losses of energy exporting countries might trigger financial crises with worldwide repercussions; crises might also emerge from financial distress of emerging market debtors with liabilities denominated in US dollars. Extremely low interest rates might not only trigger stock and bond price booms, but also more volatility if investors become fearful of financial bubbles. Quite a few conditions are highly beneficial for a recovery of the euro area economy: governments and large corporations benefit from ultra-low bond yields, banks’ composite costs of debt financing have been converging during the past two years to very low levels, and borrowing costs for non-financial corporations have come down markedly. Prices for stocks, bonds and (on average) houses have gone up. Real disposable incomes of private households have risen due to oil prices. The real effective exchange rate is about 10% lower in March 2015 than it was a year ago, strengthening the price competitiveness of firms in the euro area. According to our forecasts, the euro area GDP will grow by 1.6% in 2015 and by 2.1% in 2016. Structural impediments, however, still limit the ability of the euro area economy to grow strongly: firms and, in particular, private households are only slowly reducing their heavy debt burdens, and confidence will not fully come back in France and Italy, as long as reform processes are inconclusive in both countries and as long as unemployment is not coming down markedly. Our inflation forecast for 2015 is 0.1%, with the possibility of a mild deflation not excluded. In 2016 inflation will increase up to 1.3%, still clearly below the 2% ECB’s target. This calls for continued monetary expansion, though its effects could be limited in the absence of a complementary fiscal stimulus, in particular in those countries where the implementation of structural reforms brings long term gains but short term losses.
Read article

Konjunktur aktuell: Deutsche Konjunktur: Starkes Winterhalbjahr und weiter robuste Dynamik

Konjunktur aktuell, No. 2, 2015
Abstract
Die gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktion ist in Deutschland im Jahr 2014 wieder spürbar ausgeweitet worden, insbesondere dank einer Belebung der Investitionstätigkeit und des privaten Konsums. Im Winterhalbjahr 2014/2015 dürfte der Produktionsanstieg besonders kräftig ausfallen. Auch wenn das Expansionstempo im weiteren Jahresverlauf wieder etwas abflacht, sprechen günstige Rahmenbedingungen wie gesunkene Energiekosten und sehr niedrige Finanzierungskosten für eine gute Konjunktur in den Jahren 2015 und 2016. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt dürfte im Jahr 2015 um 2,0% zulegen (66%-Prognoseintervall: 1,6% bis 2,5%).
Read article

IWH-Flash-Indikator I. und II Quartal 2015

Katja Drechsel
IWH-Flash-Indikator, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
Die deutsche Konjunktur hat im Endquartal des Jahres 2014 kräftig zugelegt. Nach der Stagnationsphase im Sommer ist die Produktion im vierten Quartal 2014 um 0,7% gestiegen. Für das erste Quartal 2015 zeigt der IWH-Flash-Indikator eine weitere, wenngleich etwas geringere Zunahme des Bruttoinlandsprodukts um 0,5% und für das zweite Quartal 2015 um 0,6% an.
Read article

Can R&D Subsidies Counteract the Economic Crisis? – Macroeconomic Effects in Germany

Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Jutta Günther, Brigitte Loose, Udo Ludwig, Nicole Nulsch
Research Policy, No. 3, 2015
Abstract
During the economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, governments in Europe stabilized their economies by means of fiscal policy. After decades of absence, deficit spending was used to counteract the heavy decline in demand. In Germany, public spending went partially into R&D subsidies in favor of small and medium sized enterprises. Applying the standard open input–output model, the paper analyzes the macroeconomic effects of R&D subsidies on employment and production in the business cycle. Findings in the form of backward multipliers suggest that R&D subsidies have stimulated a substantial leverage effect. Almost two thirds of the costs of R&D projects are covered by the enterprises themselves. Overall, a subsidized R&D program results in a production, value added and employment effect that amounts to at least twice the initial financing. Overall, the R&D program counteracts the decline of GDP by 0.5% in the year 2009. In the year 2010 the effects are already procyclical since the German economy recovered quickly. Compared to the strongly discussed alternative uses of subsidies for private consumption, R&D spending is more effective.
Read article

Konjunktur aktuell: Deutsche Konjunktur kommt langsam wieder in Schwung

Konjunktur aktuell, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt in Deutschland stieg im Jahr 2014 um 1,5% und wird im Jahr 2015 wohl um 1,3% zulegen. Nach einem schwachen Winterhalbjahr dürfte die deutsche Konjunktur langsam wieder in Schwung kommen, auch weil der niedrige Ölpreis für deutsche Haushalte und Unternehmen eine Kostenentlastung bedeutet. Der Verbraucherpreisindex dürfte im Jahr 2015 um 1,1% zunehmen. Die Arbeitslosenquote wird wohl auf ihrem aktuellen Niveau von 6,4% verharren, obwohl vom flächendeckenden Mindestlohn für sich genommen negative Beschäftigungseffekte ausgehen werden.
Read article

Zur Wirtschaftspolitik: Investitionen fördern – aber nicht allein mit mehr öffentlichen Mitteln!

Oliver Holtemöller, Konstantin Kiesel, Axel Lindner, Andreas Schmalzbauer, Götz Zeddies
Konjunktur aktuell, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
Seit Ausbruch der europäischen Schulden- und Vertrauenskrise stellten sich der Wirtschaftspolitik in Deutschland vermeintlich ganz andere Aufgaben als auf europäischer Ebene. Es herrschte der Eindruck vor, dass Deutschland im Vergleich zu den Krisenländern strukturell gut aufgestellt sei. Der Rückgang der konjunkturellen Dynamik in Deutschland lenkt nunmehr die Aufmerksamkeit auch wieder verstärkt auf wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderungen im Inland.
Read article

Die mittelfristige wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in Deutschland für die Jahre 2014 bis 2019

Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Katja Drechsel, Oliver Holtemöller, Brigitte Loose, Götz Zeddies
Konjunktur aktuell, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
Alles in allem dürfte das Bruttoinlandsprodukt in Deutschland im Jahr 2014 um 1,5% steigen. Im Jahr 2015 wird es wohl um 1,3% zunehmen – etwa 0,2 Prozentpunkte davon sind auf den Ölpreisrückgang zurückzuführen. Nach einer Unterauslastung der Kapazitäten im Jahr 2014 dürfte sich die Produktionslücke Ende des Jahres 2015 schließen. Im Jahr 2016 dürfte die Produktion um 1,6% steigen. Für das Jahr 2014 reicht das 66%-Prognoseintervall für den Zuwachs des Bruttoinlandsprodukts von 1,4% bis 1,6%, für das Jahr 2015 von 0,4% bis 2,1% und für das Jahr 2016 von 0,2% bis 3,4%.
Read article

EFN Report Winter 2014/15: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2015 and 2016

EFN Reports, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
At the beginning of the year 2015 crude oil is, with little more than 50 dollars per barrel (Brent), about 50% cheaper than in the summer 2014. The oil price hike is a stimulus for the whole world economy, even though the gains of energy users are matched by losses of the suppliers: oil producing countries frequently run high current account surpluses vis-à-vis the rest of the world. It is therefore plausible to assume that, reacting to the redistribution of incomes, the oil user countries will increase their spending by more than what will be lost in spending by producers. Investment activity in the euro area has recently been particularly weak. Remarkably, investment in Greece, Portugal, and Spain, i.e. in countries that had to accept international support during the euro crisis, has strengthened. The setback took place in the so-called core countries, including Germany. Consumption growth was also subdued. Lower oil prices, by increasing real incomes of consumers and lowering production costs for firms, should increase private consumption and, in particular, investment. Moreover, the depreciation of the euro will favour exports. Overall, according to our forecasts, the euro area GDP will grow by 1.3% in 2015 and by 1.6% in 2016. GDP growth is about 0.3 percentage points higher due to the impact of lower oil prices in 2015. However, these forecasts are subject to substantial uncertainty, and we do not see any significant reduction of the unemployment rate during the forecasting horizon. Our inflation forecast for 2015 is 0.3%, with the possibility of a mild deflation not excluded. In 2016 inflation will increase up to 1.1%, still clearly below the 2% ECB’s target. This calls for further monetary expansion, though its effects could be limited in the absence of a complementary fiscal stimulus. The expansionary cyclical policies should be combined with more structural reforms to enhance the competitiveness of the euro area and its growth potential, which in our forecasts remains quite limited. In fact, we expect potential output to grow by only 0.4% both in 2015 and 2016.
Read article

Switching to Exchange Rate Flexibility? The Case of Central and Eastern European Inflation Targeters

Andrej Drygalla
FIW Working Paper, No. 139, 2015
Abstract
This paper analyzes changes in the monetary policy in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland following the policy shift from exchange rate targeting to inflation targeting around the turn of the millennium. Applying a Markovswitching dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, switches in the policy parameters and the volatilities of shocks hitting the economies are estimated and quantified. Results indicate the presence of regimes of weak and strong responses of the central banks to exchange rate movements as well as periods of high and low volatility. Whereas all three economies switched to a less volatile regime over time, findings on changes in the policy parameters reveal a lower reaction to exchange rate movements in the Czech Republic and Poland, but an increased attention to it in Hungary. Simulations for the Czech Republic and Poland also suggest their respective central banks, rather than a sound macroeconomic environment, being accountable for reducing volatility in variables like inflation and output. In Hungary, their favorable developments can be attributed to a larger extent to the reduction in the size of external disturbances.
Read article

Do We Need New Modelling Approaches in Macroeconomics?

Claudia M. Buch, Oliver Holtemöller
Financial Cycles and the Real Economy: Lessons for CESEE Countries, 2014
Abstract
The economic and financial crisis that emerged in 2008 also initiated an intense discussion on macroeconomic research and the role of economists in society. The debate focuses on three main issues. Firstly, it is argued that economists failed to predict the crisis and to design early warning systems. Secondly, it is claimed that economists use models of the macroeconomy which fail to integrate financial markets and which are inadequate to model large economic crises. Thirdly, the issue has been raised that economists invoke unrealistic assumptions concerning human behaviour by assuming that all agents are self-centred, rationally optimizing individuals. In this paper, we focus on the first two issues. Overall, our thrust is that the above statements are a caricature of modern economic theory and empirics. A rich field of research developed already before the crisis and picked up shortcomings of previous models.
Read article
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoSupported by the BMWK