Der Klimawandel und die übermäßige Nutzung natürlicher Ressourcen stellen große Herausforderungen für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung auf der Erde dar. Auf Seite der Unternehmen besteht die Herausforderung darin, Wege zu finden, wie sie Ressourcen schonen und Emissionen senken können. Die Verbraucher wiederum haben über ihr Konsumverhalten Einfluss darauf, welche Produkte Unternehmen überhaupt absetzen können. Nachhaltiger Konsum ist somit ein wichtiger Baustein in der grünen Transformation. In einer jüngst als IWH-Diskussionspapier erschienenen Studie wird untersucht, inwiefern Inflationssorgen den Kauf von Bio-Produkten beeinflussen. Gerade in Zeiten stark steigender Preise könnte die Sorge über das eigene Budget die Sorgen über Klimawandel und Nachhaltigkeit in den Hintergrund treten lassen und sich somit negativ auf den Konsum von oft relativ teuren Bio-Produkten auswirken. Die Ergebnisse der Studie basieren auf einer Befragung von rund 1 200 Teilnehmenden sowie einem Feldexperiment zum tatsächlichen Einkaufsverhalten mit circa 500 Teilnehmenden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass gerade Teilnehmende mit vergleichsweise geringerem Umweltbewusstsein und, damit einhergehend, sowieso schon niedrigerem Anteil an nachhaltigen Produkten nochmals erheblich weniger nachhaltige Produkte konsumieren, sobald sie mit Inflationssorgen konfrontiert werden.

This paper examines how firms’ exposure to supply chain disruptions (SCD) affects firm outcomes in the European Union (EU). Exploiting heterogeneous responses to workplace closures imposed by sourcing countries during the pandemic as a shock to SCD, we provide empirical evidence that firms in industries relying more heavily on foreign inputs experience a significant decline in sales compared to other firms. We document that external finance, particularly bank financing, plays a critical role in mitigating the effects of SCD. Furthermore, we highlight the unique importance of bank loans for small and solvent firms. Our findings also indicate that highly diversified firms and those sourcing inputs from less distant partners are less vulnerable to SCD.

This field experiment investigates the causal impact of mothers’ perceptions of gender norms on their employment attitudes and labor-supply expectations. We provide mothers of young children in Germany with information about the prevailing gender norm regarding maternal employment in their city. At baseline, over 70% of mothers incorrectly perceive this gender norm as too conservative – the most pronounced misperception among the various gender norms we examine. Our randomized information treatment improves the accuracy of these perceptions, significantly reducing the share of mothers who perceive gender norms as overly conservative. The treatment also shifts mothers’ own labormarket attitudes in a more liberal direction. Leveraging the fact that we assessed attitudes in a prior survey, we show that specifically the shifted attitude is a strong predictor of mothers’ future labor-market participation. Consistently, treated mothers are more likely to plan an increase in their working hours, particularly those with existing support to facilitate their employment.

We investigate public preferences for equity-enhancing policies in access to early child care, using a survey experiment with a representative sample of the German population (n ≈ 4, 800). We observe strong misperceptions about migrant-native inequalities in early child care that vary by respondents’ age and right-wing voting preferences. Randomly providing information about the actual extent of inequalities has a nuanced impact on the support for equity-enhancing policy reforms: it increases support for respondents who initially underestimated these inequalities, and tends to decrease support for those who initially overestimated them. This asymmetric effect leads to a more consensual policy view, substantially decreasing the polarization in policy support between under- and overestimators. Our results suggest that correcting misperceptions can align public policy preferences, potentially leading to less polarized debates about how to address inequalities and discrimination.