We study the impact of higher capital requirements on banks’ balance sheets and their transmission to the real economy. The 2011 EBA capital exercise is an almost ideal quasi-natural experiment to identify this impact with a difference-in-differences matching estimator. We find that treated banks increase their capital ratios by reducing their risk-weighted assets, not by raising their levels of equity, consistent with debt overhang. Banks reduce lending to corporate and retail customers, resulting in lower asset, investment, and sales growth for firms obtaining a larger share of their bank credit from the treated banks.

This study analyses the performance of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) World Economic Outlook output forecasts for the world and for both the advanced economies and the emerging and developing economies. With a focus on the forecast for the current year and the next year, we examine the durability of IMF forecasts, looking at how much time has to pass so that IMF forecasts can be improved by using leading indicators with monthly updates. Using a real-time data set for GDP and for indicators, we find that some simple single-indicator forecasts on the basis of data that are available at higher frequency can significantly outperform the IMF forecasts as soon as the publication of the IMF’s Outlook is only a few months old. In particular, there is an obvious gain using leading indicators from January to March for the forecast of the current year.

• The cyclical upswing of the world economy comes to an end, since expansionary policies in the US are expected to peter out in 2019, and the protectionist course of the US government clouds the perspectives for world trade. • However, if a major trade conflict can be avoided, chances are good that world production growth will be close to the long-run average of a bit more than 3%, with trade expanding at a similar pace. • Slowing exports, in particular to China, can partly explain the setback, while domestic conditions still appear favourable: firms continued hiring, albeit by less than before, tight labour markets in many member countries have caused wages to rise more quickly, and house prices continue to increase markedly. • Since a trend to higher inflationary dynamics is still not detectable, the ECB is likely to either keep key interest rates unchanged in 2019 or raise them very carefully at the end of the year. • All in all, we expect the euro area growth rate to come down from 1.9% in 2018 to 1.5% in 2019 and 1.8% in 2020, and inflation to slightly slow down from 1.8% in 2018 to 1.6% in 2019 and 1.5% in 2020.

In Deutschland wird die Anzahl der Erwerbspersonen mittelfristig aufgrund der Alterung der Bevölkerung sinken und damit auch das Wirtschaftswachstum niedriger ausfallen als in den vergangenen Jahren. Gleichzeitig hat die Bundesregierung eine Reihe von zusätzlichen Staatsausgaben beschlossen. Auf der Grundlage einer gesamtwirtschaftlichen Projektion mit dem IWH-Deutschlandmodell lässt sich aber zeigen, dass es bis zum Jahr 2025 kaum zu Haushaltsdefiziten kommt, auch wenn sämtliche im Koalitionsvertrag enthaltenen finanzpolitischen Maßnahmen umgesetzt werden. Selbst wenn sich die makroökonomischen Rahmenbedingungen verschlechtern, etwa wegen eines deutlichen Zinsanstiegs oder eines Einbruchs der ausländischen Nachfrage, würde der Finanzierungssaldo zwar negativ, die zu erwartenden Defizite lägen aber dennoch wohl unter 0,5% in Relation zum Bruttoinlandspro-dukt. Ein Einbruch der ausländischen Nachfrage würde die Produktion zwar stärker dämpfen als ein Zinsschock, die Effekte auf den gesamtstaatlichen Finanzierungssaldo wären aber vergleichbar. Denn ein Zinsschock belastet eher die Binnennachfrage, von deren Rückgang die staatlichen Einnahmen stärker betroffen sind als von einem Rückgang der Exporte. Für die kommenden Jahre dürfte der deutsche Staatshaushalt damit recht robust sein; dabei ist aber zu beachten, dass etwa die aus dem Rentenpaket resultierenden Mehrausgaben erst nach dem Jahr 2025 deutlich zu Buche schlagen.

The intention for the Italian government to stimulate business activity via large increases in government spending is not in line with the stabilisation of the public debt ratio. Instead, if such policy were implemented, the risk of a sovereign debt crisis would be high. In this article, we analyse the capacity of the Italian economy to shoulder sovereign debt under different scenarios. We conclude that focusing on growth enhancing structural reforms, would allow for moderate increases in public expenditure.

We build a model of firm-level innovation, productivity growth, and reallocation featuring endogenous entry and exit. A new and central economic force is the selection between high- and low-type firms, which differ in terms of their innovative capacity. We estimate the parameters of the model using US Census microdata on firm-level output, R&D, and patenting. The model provides a good fit to the dynamics of firm entry and exit, output, and R&D. Taxing the continued operation of incumbents can lead to sizable gains (of the order of 1.4 percent improvement in welfare) by encouraging exit of less productive firms and freeing up skilled labor to be used for R&D by high-type incumbents. Subsidies to the R&D of incumbents do not achieve this objective because they encourage the survival and expansion of low-type firms.

This paper is the first to study the effects of capital account liberalization on structural transformation and compare the contribution of within term and structural term to economic growth. We use a 10-sector-level productivity dataset to decomposes the effects of opening capital account on within-sector productivity growth and cross-sector structural transformation. We find that opening capital account is associated with labor productivity and employment share increment in sectors with higher human capital intensity and external financial dependence, as well as non-tradable sectors. But it results in a growth-reducing structural transformation by directing labor into sectors with lower productivity. Moreover, in the ten years after capital account liberalization, the contribution share of structural transformation decreases while that of within productivity growth increases. We conclude that the relationship between capital account liberalization and economic growth is within gain and structural pain.