2nd TSI Workshop
Presentations 2nd TSI Workshop - Halle, Germany Welcome Note - Filippo di Mauro 1. Energy - Laura Lehtonen, Alessansdro Zona Mattioli 2. Competitiveness - Marco Matani, Sara…
See page
Centre for Business and Productivity Dynamics
Centre for Business and Productivity Dynamics (IWH-CBPD) The Centre for Business and Productivity Dynamics (CBPD) was founded in January 2025 and works with policy and research…
See page
9th vintage
9th Vintage CompNet Dataset The CompNet dataset includes a set of micro-aggregated indicators to enhance policy and academic analysis on competitiveness and productivity. All the…
See page
IWH-Flash-Indikator I. und II. Quartal 2025
Katja Heinisch, Oliver Holtemöller, Axel Lindner, Birgit Schultz
IWH-Flash-Indikator,
No. 1,
2025
Abstract
Die deutsche Konjunktur hat zum Ende des Jahres 2024 einen weiteren Rückschlag erhalten. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) sank im vierten Quartal 2024 um 0,2%. Es ist damit seit Mitte 2022 auf einem leicht sinkenden Trend (vgl. Abbildung 1). Wenngleich staatliche und private Konsumausgaben zugelegt haben dürften, konnten diese die deutlich gesunkenen Exporte nicht kompensieren. Damit ging auch die Wirtschaftsleistung im Jahr 2024 insgesamt um 0,2% zurück.
In den Unternehmen hat sich die Lage zuletzt anscheinend stabilisiert, die Erwartungen verschlechtern sich jedoch weiter. Die Risiken, die von der US-Wirtschaftspolitik ausgehen, dürften die Investitionsbereitschaft der Unternehmen bremsen. Das senkt nicht nur gegenwärtig die Chancen auf eine konjunkturelle Erholung, sondern wirkt auch mittelfristig hemmend auf das Produktionspotenzial. Alles in allem wird wohl das Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) laut IWH-Flash-Indikator im ersten Quartal 2025 nur wenig um 0,2% und im zweiten Quartal um 0,3% zulegen.
Read article
Ecological Preferences and the carbon Intensity of Corporate Investment
Michael Koetter, Felix Noth
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 2,
2025
Abstract
Lowering carbon intensity in manufacturing is necessary to transform current production technologies. We test if local agents’ preferences, revealed by vote shares for the Green party during local elections in Germany, relate to the carbon intensity of investments in production technologies. Our sample comprises all investment choices made by manufacturing establishments from 2005-2017. Our results suggest that ecological preferences correlate with significantly fewer carbon-intensive investment projects while investments stimulating growth and reducing carbon emissions increase by 14 percentage points. Both results are more distinct in federal states where the Green Party enjoys political power and local ecological preferences are high.
Read article
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice
Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice (IWH-CEP) The Centre for Evidence-based Policy Advice (IWH-CEP) of the IWH was founded in 2014. It is a platform that bundles and…
See page
Overview, Contact and Opening Hours
Library The IWH scientific library is specialized in economics, corresponding to the Institute's research profile. The library stock contains especially literature on the…
See page
Contact
Contact Get a quick overview of how to reach us and whom to contact: Postal Address: Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) - Member of the Leibniz Association P.O. Box 11 03…
See page
Organisation of Research
Tasks of the IWH Guided by its mission statement , the IWH places the understanding of the determinants of long term growth processes at the centre of the research agenda. Long…
See page
The German Energy Crisis: A TENK-based Fiscal Policy Analysis
Alexandra Gutsch, Christoph Schult
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 1,
2025
Abstract
We study the aggregate, distributional, and welfare effects of fiscal policy responses to Germany’s energy crisis arising in 2022 using a novel ten-agent new Keynesian (TENK) model. The crisis, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, led to sharp price increases and significant consumption disparities. Our model, calibrated to Germany’s income and consumption distribution, evaluates key policy interventions. We find that untargeted transfers had the largest short-term aggregate impact, while targeted transfers for lower-income households were most cost-effective. Other instruments yielded comparably limited welfare gains. The results highlight how targeted fiscal measures can address distributional effects and stabilize consumption during crises.
Read article