manufacturing have collapsed are trying to stimulate entrepreneurial activities of businesses in the cultural industry. The question is whether this strategy could be successful. This article examines the strategy of supporting the sector of Media Industry (´MI´) by policy makers in the region of Halle in East Germany, where a strong de-industrialization has taken place after the German reunification. Stimulated by the policy makers’ support measures, there actually was a remarkable development of MI. However, the number of MI firms and their employees did not further increase in recent years, after having reached a certain level. This illustrates the limits of political measures for turning a city’s path of industrial development voluntarily.

Degree-level science and engineering skills as well as management and leadership skills are often referred to as a source of innovative activities within companies. Broken down by sectoral innovation patterns, this article examines the role of formal education and actual occupation for product innovation performance in manufacturing firms within a probit model. It uses unique micro data for Germany (LIAB) that contain detailed information about innovative activities and the qualification of employees. We find significant differences of the human capital endowment between sectors differentiated according to the Pavitt classification. Sectors with a high share of highly skilled employees engage in product innovation above average (specialized suppliers and science based industries). According to our hitherto estimation results, within these sectors the share of highly skilled employees does not, however, substantially increase the probability to be an innovative firm.

This research assesses the firm-specific reasons for lower producitivity levels between West and East German firms. The study is based on a unique data-base generated by field-work in the two particularly important sectors of machinery manufacturers and furniture manufacturers. Our results suggest that the quality of human capital plays an important role in explaining lower productivity levels, as well as particularly networking activities, and the use of modern technologies for communication. Classifying those as management-functions beyond the organisation of the production process itself, we identify management deficits as the main specific determinants of productivity gaps between West and East German firms.

In contrast to the majority of the former centrally planned economies, the East German economy has suffered from enormous losses in the transformation process. In the study the question is analyzed whether exports can contribute to the catching-up process in transitional economies. Here it must be explained why the firms emerging out of the privatization process in economies in transition are successful if the export sector consists of small and medium sized enterprises. That is the case with East German manufacturing industry. The study is based on individual company data from the surveys of the East Germany's and North Rhine Westphalia's manufacturing industry between 1995 and 2001 stemming from official statistics.

Foreign direct investment is an essential aspect of ‘globalization’ yet its empirical determinants are not well understood. What we do know is based either on poor data for a wide range of nations, or good data for the US and Swedish cases. In this paper, we provide evidence on the determinants of the activities of German multinational firms by using a newly available firm-level data set from the Deutsche Bundesbank. The specific goal of this paper is to demonstrate the relative role of country-level and firm-level determinants of foreign direct investment. We focus on three main questions: First, what are the main driving forces of German firms’ multinational activities? Second, is there evidence that sector-level and firm-level factors shape internationalization patterns? Third, is there evidence of agglomeration effects in the foreign activities of German firms? We find that the market access motive for internationalization dominates. Firms move abroad mainly to gain better access to large foreign markets. Cost-saving motives, however, are important for some manufacturing sectors. Our results strongly suggest that firm-level heterogeneity has an important influence on internationalization patterns – as stressed by recent models of international trade. We also find positive agglomeration effects for the activities of German firms that stem from the number of other German firms that are active on a given foreign market. In terms of lessons for economic policy, our results show that lowering barriers to the integration of markets and encouraging the formation of human capital can promote the activities of multinational firms. However, our results related to the heterogeneity of firms and agglomeration tendencies show that it might be difficult to fine-tune policies directed at the exploitation of synergies and at the creation of clusters of foreign firms.

Das Geschäftsklima im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe Ostdeutschlands war laut IWH-Umfrage unter rund 300 Unternehmen auch im März aufwärts gerichtet. Die Geschäftslage wurde zwar leicht zurückhaltender eingeschätzt als zuvor. Die Geschäftsaussichten legten aber gegenüber der vorangegangenen Umfrage weiter zu. Der Vorjahresstand wird von beiden Einschätzungen weit übertroffen. Die Verbesserung des Geschäftsklimas in Folge spricht dafür, dass sich der konjunkturelle Erholungsprozess fortsetzt.

Die Investitionstätigkeit in Ostdeutschland ist durch massive staatliche Förderung gekennzeichnet. Die mit Abstand wichtigsten Instrumente, hinsichtlich des Fördervolumens sowie der Inanspruchnahme durch die Betriebe, sind die Investitionszulage und die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe zur „Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur“ (GA). In diesem Beitrag wird der Einfluss untersucht, die die Teilnahme an der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe auf die Investitionshöhe ausübt. Das dabei auftretende Problem der Selbstselektion wird mit Hilfe eines Selektionsmodells gelöst. Auf der ersten Stufe wird mit einem Probitmodell die Teilnahmewahrscheinlichkeit an der GA-Förderung geschätzt.

Daran anschließend wird die Investitionshöhe der Betriebe erklärt, u.a. durch

die Teilnahme bzw. Nichtteilnahme an der GA-Förderung. Dabei stellt sich heraus, dass die Fördervariable im betrachteten Zeitraum einen signifikant positiven Effekt sowohl auf die Investitionen je Beschäftigten als auch auf die Investitionen je Umsatzeinheit ausübt, die GA-Förderung also investitionssteigernd wirkte.

This paper supplements prior analysis on ‘patterns and prospects’ (Stephan, 2003) in which prospects for the speed of future productivity growth were assessed by looking at the specialisation patterns in domestic production. This analysis adds the foreign trade sphere to the results generated in the prior analysis. The refined results are broadly in line with the results from the original analysis, indicating the robustness of our methods applied in either analysis. The most prominent results pertain to Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. Those two countries appear to be best suited for swift productivity catch-up from the viewpoint of sectoral specialisation. Poland and Estonia exhibit the lowest potentials. Only for the case of Poland would results suggest bleak prospects.

This report summarises the results generated in empirical analysis within a larger EU 5th FP RTD-project on the determinants of productivity gaps between the current EU-15 and accession states in Central East Europe. The focus of research in this part of the project is on sectoral specialisation patterns emerging as a result of intensifying integration between the current EU and a selection of six newly acceding economies, namely Estonia, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary and Slovenia. The research-leading question is concerned with the role played by the respective specialisation patterns for (i) the explanation of observed productivity gaps and for (ii) the projection of future potentials of productivity growth in Central East Europe.

For the aggregated level, analysis determines the share of national productivity gaps accountable to acceding countries’ particular sectoral patterns, and their role for aggregate productivity growth: in Poland, the Slovak Republic and Hungary, sectoral shares of national productivity gaps are considerable and might evolve into a ‘barrier’ to productivity catch-up.Moreover, past productivity growth was dominated by a downward adjustment in employment rather than structural change. With the industrial sector of manufacturing having been identified as the main source of national productivity gaps and growth, the subsequent analysis focuses on the role of industrial specialisation patterns and develops an empirical model to project future productivity growth potentials. Each chapter closes with some policy conclusions.

Für eine Einschätzung der zukünftigen Entwicklung in den Kandidatenländern der Europäischen Union (EU) spielt das Wachstum der Produktivität im verarbeitenden Gewerbe eine wichtige Rolle. Eine Projektion der Entwicklung der Arbeitsproduktivität in den verarbeitenden Industrien der Länder Mittel- und Osteuropas kann sich die Erfahrungen aus anderen Ländern, die ebenfalls ein deutliches Entwicklungsgefälle zur EU aufweisen, stützen.