Die Abwanderung überwiegend junger, gebildeter Menschen aus Ostdeutschland wird häufig als nachteilig für die Entwicklungsfähigkeit und den Aufholprozess der Neuen Länder betrachtet. Das Phänomen der Zuwanderung – und dabei nicht zuletzt der Rückwanderung vormals Abgewanderter – findet in diesem Zusammenhang besonderes Interesse. Die vorliegende Arbeit analysiert die Rückwanderungsneigung auf Basis eines im Rahmen des DFG-Forschungsprojektes „Brain drain aus Ostdeutschland“ am Lehrstuhl für Sozialgeographie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg erhobenen Datensatzes zu den Einstellungen und Motivlagen aus Sachsen-Anhalt abgewanderter junger Menschen. Dabei wird auf folgende Aspekte besonderer Wert gelegt: die Wirkung des Arbeitsmarkterfolges nach der Abwanderung; der Einfluss sozialer Bindungen in der Herkunfts- und der Zielregion; schließlich die Selektivität der Rückwanderungsneigung. Im Ergebnis zeigt sich erstens, dass der individuelle Arbeitsmarkterfolg in der Zielregion die Rückkehrneigung verringert. Zweitens konnte die rückwanderungsfördernde Wirkung bestehender sozialer Bindungen zum Herkunftsgebiet nachgewiesen werden. Hinsichtlich der Selektivität der Rückwanderungsintentionen sind die Ergebnisse ambivalent.

20 Jahre nach der „friedlichen Revolution“ und dem darauffolgenden Herstellen der staatlichen Einheit Deutschlands legt das IWH erneut eine Dokumentation der gesellschaftlichen, vor allen Dingen der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung vor. Ziel ist es, anhand von Zahlen, Schaubildern und Tabellen mit entsprechenden Erklärungen die Vielschichtigkeit des Wandels der Neuen Länder aufzuzeigen. Damit fällt auch die Bewertung differenziert aus: Es gibt eine weitgehend modernisierte Infrastruktur, das erste, was an „blühende Landschaften“ erinnern mag. Einige Unternehmen und Standorte konnten sich mit großem wirtschaftlichen Erfolg die Weltmarktführerschaft in wesentlichen Technologien sichern. Aber es gibt auch einen massiven Bevölkerungsverlust, sich entleerende Gebiete. Manche Städte und erhebliche Teile des ländlichen Raums suchen eine neue Aufgabe in der nationalen und internationalen Arbeitsteilung.

This article assesses whether the economy of East Germany is catching up with the West German region in terms of welfare. While the primary measure for convergence and catching up is per capita output, we also look at other macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rates, wage rates and production levels in the manufacturing sector. In contrast to existing studies of convergence between regions of the reunified Germany, our approach is based purely upon the time series dimension and is thus directly focused on the catching up process in East Germany as a region. Our testing set-up includes standard ADF unit root tests as well as unit root tests that endogenously allow for a break in the deterministic component of the process. We find evidence of catching up for East Germany for most of the indicators. However, the convergence speed is slow, and thus it can be expected that the catching up process will take further decades until the regional gap is closed.

We argue that monetary policies in euro-candidate countries should also aim at mitigating excessive instability of the key target and instrument variables of monetary policy during turbulent market periods. Our empirical tests show a significant degree of leptokurtosis, thus prevalence of tail-risks, in the conditional volatility series of such variables in the euro-candidate countries. Their central banks will be well-advised to use both standard and unorthodox (discretionary) tools of monetary policy to mitigate such extreme risks while steering their economies out of the crisis and through the euroconvergence process. Such policies provide flexibility that is not embedded in the Taylor-type instrument rules, or in the Maastricht convergence criteria.

Despite extensive government support the gap between East and West Germany has still not been successfully closed nearly 20 years post German unification. Hence, some economists tend to compare East Germany with Mezzogiorno – underdeveloped Southern Italy. East Germany is still subject to sever structural problems in comparison to West Germany: lower per capita income, lower productivity, higher unemployment rates, fewer firm headquarters and fewer innovation activities. There are East German regions with less than desirable rates of development. Nevertheless, the new federal states have shown some evidence of a convergence process. Some regions have developed very positively – they have improved their competitiveness and employment levels. As such, the comparison of East Germany with Mezzogiorno does not seem applicable today.

According to Neoclassical Growth Theory, regional policy is targeted enhancing investment (hereafter the notion ‘investment policy’ is used). has been the most important instrument in forcing the ‘reconstruction of the East’. Overall, the investment policy is seen as having been successful. It is not, however, the only factor influencing regional development – political policy makers noted in the mid 1990s that research and development (R&D) activities and regional concentrated production networks, amongst other factors, may also play a part. The investment policy instrument has therefore been adjusted. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that investment policy may fail in particular cases because it contains potentially conflicting targets. A ‘better road’ for future regional policy may lie in the support of regional production and innovation networks – the so-called industrial clusters. These clusters would need to be exactingly identified however to ensure effective and efficient cluster policies.

Most observers have concluded that while money markets and government bond markets are rapidly integrating following the introduction of the common currency in the euro area, there is little evidence that a similar integration process is taking place for retail banking. Data on cross-border retail bank flows, cross-border bank mergers and the law of one price reveal no evidence of integration in retail banking. This paper shows that the previous tests of bank integration are weak in that they are not based on an equilibrium concept and are neither necessary nor sufficient statistics for bank integration. The paper proposes a new test of integration based on convergence in banks' profitability. The new test emphasises the role of an active market for corporate control and of competition in banking integration. European listed banks profitability appears to converge to a common level. There is weak evidence that competition eliminates high profits for these banks, and underperforming banks tend to show improved profitability. Unlisted European banks differ markedly. Their profits show no tendency to revert to a common target rate of profitability. Overall, the banking market in Europe appears far from being integrated. In contrast, in the U.S. both listed and unlisted commercial banks profits converge to the same target, and high profit banks see their profits driven down quickly.

The paper shows that mispriced deposit insurance and capital regulation were of second-order importance in determining the capital structure of large U.S. and European banks during 1991 to 2004. Instead, standard cross-sectional determinants of non-financial firms’ leverage carry over to banks, except for banks whose capital ratio is close to the regulatory minimum. Consistent with a reduced role of deposit insurance, we document a shift in banks’ liability structure away from deposits towards non-deposit liabilities. We find that unobserved time-invariant bank fixed-effects are ultimately the most important determinant of banks’ capital structures and that banks’ leverage converges to bank specific, time-invariant targets.

Der Grundsatz der „Gleichwertigkeit der Lebensverhältnisse“ wird heute in Deutschland allgemein akzeptiert. Allerdings wird über die „richtige“ Interpretation des Grundsatzes und über die „richtigen“ Mittel zu seiner Realisierung vielfach diskutiert und gestritten. Vor dem Hintergrund und auf der Basis einer Auswertung verschiedener Detailstudien zu dieser Thematik gelangt der Beitrag zu dem Ergebnis, dass das Ziel „Gleichwertiger Lebensverhältnisse“ heute bereits vielfach besser erreicht wird, als sich dies erwarten ließe, wenn man ausschließlich vorliegende Indikatoren auf der Grundlage der amtlichen Statistik zur Ausstattung deutscher Städte und Regionen mit Infrastruktur betrachtet. In vielen Fällen kommt es über marktwirtschaftliche Prozesse zu ausgleichenden Tendenzen.

This paper investigates the driving forces of output change in 77 countries during the period 1970–2000. A flexible modeling strategy is adopted that accounts for (i) the inefficient use of resources, and (ii) different production technologies across countries. The proposed model can identify technical, efficiency, and input change for each of three endogenously determined regimes. Membership in these regimes is estimated, rather than determined ex ante. This framework enables explorations into the determinants of output growth and convergence issues in each regime.