The focus of this paper is on the match between strategic motives of foreign investments into Central-Eastern Europe and locational advantages offered by these countries. Our analysis makes use of the IWH-FDI-Micro Database, a unique dataset that contains information from 2009 about the determinants of locational factors, technological activity of the subsidiaries, and the potentials for knowledge spillovers in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. The analysis suggests that investors in these countries are mainly interested in low (unit) labour costs coupled with a well-trained and educated workforce and an expanding market with the high growth rates in the purchasing power of potential buyers. It also suggests that the financial crisis reduced the attractiveness of the region as a source for localised knowledge and technology. There appears to be a match between investors’ expectations and the quantitative supply of unqualified labour, not however for the supply of medium qualified workers. But the analysis suggests that it is not technology-seeking investments that are particularly content with the capabilities of their host economies in terms of technological cooperation. Finally, technological cooperation within the local host economy is assessed more favourably with domestic firms than with local scientific institutions – an important message for domestic economic policy.

Der Beitrag stellt die IWH-FDI-Mikrodatenbank vor. Er beschreibt die konzeptionellen Ideen der Datenbank und wie sich die Datenbank von anderen, existierenden Mikrodaten zu ausländischen Direktinvestitionen unterscheidet. Seit 2007 werden im Rahmen der IWH-FDI-Mikrodatenbank auf Unternehmensebene Informationen gesammelt zur allgemeinen Geschäftsentwicklung, zu technologischen Aktivitäten und zu Informationen über die konzerninternen Governancestrukturen. Die Daten werden bei den ausländischen Tochtergesellschaften multinationaler Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland und Osteuropa erhoben. Der Beitrag zeigt auf, welche Forschungslücken mit dem Datensatz bisher geschlossen wurden und schließt mit einem Ausblick bezüglich zukünftiger Forschungspotentiale.

There is growing consensus that the conduct of monetary policy can have an impact on financial and economic stability through the risk-taking incentives of banks. Falling interest rates might induce a “search for yield” and generate incentives to invest into risky activities. This paper provides evidence on the link between monetary policy and commercial property prices and the risk-taking incentives of banks. We use a factor-augmented vector autoregressive model (FAVAR) for the U.S. for the years 1997-2008. We include standard macroeconomic indicators and factors summarizing information provided in the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Terms of Business Lending. These data allow modeling the reactions of banks’ new lending volumes and the riskiness of new loans. We do not find evidence for a risk-taking channel for the entire banking system after a monetary policy loosening or an unexpected increase in property prices. This masks, however, important differences across banking groups. Small domestic banks increase their exposure to risk, foreign banks lower risk, and large domestic banks do not change their risk exposure.

In the early phase of transition that started with the 1990s, Central and Eastern European Countries pursued economic restructuring of the enterprise sector that involved massive injections of state support. Also foreign investment from the West and facilitation of the development of a market economy involved massive injections of state support. With their accession to the European Union (EU), levels and forms of state aid came under critical review by the European Commission. This inquiry investigates whether the integration of the new member states operates on a level playing field with respect to state aid. Quantitative and qualitative analysis is relied upon to answer this key, as well as other, related questions. Findings suggest that in recent years a level playing field across the EU has indeed emerged. State aid in the new EU member countries is rather handled more strictly than laxer compared to the ‘old’ EU countries.

This dissertation applies the theory of technology accumulation to explain the internationalisation of foreign and West German multinational enterprises (MNEs) into East Germany. This theory shifts the focus from technology transfer to the international diffusion of innovation within the MNE. It rejects the position that all MNEs offer the same technological opportunities to host economies. Yet, most of the existing empirical research on postcommunist transition economies including East Germany applies the traditional technology transfer perspective. Therefore, this dissertation provides a complementary and novel approach. We assume a dynamic interaction between existing location specific technological capabilities within the host country, MNEs’ location choice, their internationalisation of research and development (R&D) and innovation, and the potential for technological spillover effects from MNEs to the host economy. The dissertation exploits information from the IWH FDI micro database on the full population of MNEs that entered East German manufacturing until 2005 and corresponding survey data. Microeconometric estimation results generate a number of novel findings: We can show that existing location specific technological capabilities affect MNEs’ general location choice within East Germany. They are not powerful enough to attract MNEs’ technological activities. Instead, the location of MNEs’ innovation requires the joint presence of technological and industry specialisation within regions, whereas foreign R&D benefits from technological specialisation in combination with a diversified industry structure. Moreover, the location of technological activity differs depending upon the underlying motive for internationalisation. Our findings suggest that the potential for technological externalities from affiliates to local firms is subject to centrally and locally driven technological heterogeneity of MNEs. Existing location specific technological capabilities do not affect the spillover potential. This hints a limited dynamic interaction of ownership and locational advantages in firms’ internationalisation. We derive implications for the technology accumulation theory as well as for various fields of science and technology policy.

Worker remittances constitute an increasingly important channel for the

transfer of resources to developing countries. Behind foreign direct investment,

remittances are the second-largest source of external funding for developing countries. Yet, literature on worker remittances has traditionally focused on the impact of remittances on income distribution within countries, on the determinants of remittances at a micro-level, or on the effects of migration and remittances for specific countries or regions. Macroeconomic determinants and effects of remittances have received more attention only recently. Hence, the focus of this paper is on the macroeconomic determinants of remittances and on differences in these determinants between remittances and other capital flows. We find that

remittances respond more to demographic variables while private capital

flows respond more to macroeconomic conditions.

Previous empirical work on the link between domestic and foreign investment has provided mixed results. This may partly be due to the level of aggregation of the data. In this paper, we argue that the impact of FDI on the domestic capital stock depends on the structure of industries. Using industry-level data on the stock of German FDI, we test our predictions. We use panel cointegration methods which address the potential endogeneity of FDI. We find evidence for a positive long-run impact of FDI on the domestic capital stock.

The paper investigates strategic motives, technological activities and determinants of foreign investment enterprises’ embeddedness in post-transition economies (Eastern Germany and selected Central East European countries). The empirical study makes use of the IWH FDI micro database. Results of the descriptive analysis of investment motives show that market access dominates over efficiency seeking and other motives. The majority of investors are technologically active in the region as a whole, but countries differ in terms of performance. The probit model estimations show that firm specific characteristics, among them innovativeness and autonomy from parent company, are important determinants of foreign investment enterprises’ embeddedness.

Der vorliegende Beitrag betrachtet zum einen die grundlegenden Investitionsmotive multinationaler Investoren in Ostdeutschland. Zum anderen wird

untersucht, wie diese Investoren die Qualität ausgewählter Standortfaktoren in den Neuen Ländern bewerten. Im Gegensatz zu bisherigen Studien wird die Heterogenität multinationaler Unternehmen in der Analyse eingehend berücksichtigt. Die Untersuchung basiert auf der dritten Befragungswelle der IWH-FDI-Mikrodatenbank aus dem Jahr 2009, die eine repräsentative und umfangreiche Stichprobe multinationaler Investoren in der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft bietet. Die Ergebnisse belegen einen Paradigmenwechsel in der relativen Bedeutung grundlegender Investitionsmotive im Laufe der Transformation in den Neuen Ländern. Seit Mitte der 1990er Jahre ziehen sie verstärkt Investoren an, die auf die Produktdiversifikation oder technologische Vorteile abzielen, statt primär auf Kostenvorteile bei den Produktionsfaktoren oder die Ausdehnung ihrer bestehenden Produktion zu setzen. Dabei unterscheidet sich die Bedeutung der Investitionsmotive in Abhängigkeit vom Herkunftsland, der Art des Markteintritts und dem Wirtschaftszweig des multinationalen Investors. Was die Bewertung der gegebenen Standortfaktoren aus Sicht der Investoren betrifft, so schneidet die Qualität des soziokulturellen Umfelds am besten ab, gefolgt von Faktoren im Zusammenhang mit dem Potenzial für technologische Kooperationen, dem Angebot an Arbeitskräften sowie der Verfügbarkeit staatlicher Förderung. Auch in der Bewertung der Standortfaktoren zeigt sich, dass signifikante Unterschiede in Abhängigkeit vom Herkunftsland, aber auch je nach dem vorrangigen Investitionsmotiv des Investors bestehen. Abschließend identifiziert der Beitrag politischen Handlungsbedarf auf den Feldern Fachkräfteangebot sowie Technologie- und Investitionsförderung, um den Wirtschaftsstandort Neue Länder nachhaltig zu sichern.

Das IWH hat mit der dritten Welle der FDI-Mikrodatenbank im Herbst 2009 eine Befragung von ostdeutschen Unternehmen mit ausländischem und/oder westdeutschem multinationalem Investor durchgeführt. Dabei beantworteten die Unternehmen u. a. die Frage nach den strategischen Investitionsmotiven ihres ausländischen und/oder westdeutschen multinationalen Gesellschafters für die Neugründung eines Tochterunternehmens bzw. für die Beteiligung an einem bereits existierenden Unternehmen in den Neuen Bundesländern.