Agency theory holds that managerial discretion over stakeholder decisions creates agency costs through altruistic redistribution. We test this claim in a principalagent experiment where agents choose effort and transfers affecting a third party under unenforceable flat-wage contracts. We find that principals set ethically constrained targets and wages that track fairness benchmarks. Agents, however, do not divert resources to stakeholders: transfers are negative on average, and prosocial traits do not increase giving. Instead, contract terms, though unenforceable, systematically shape effort, transfers, and returns. Notably, prosocial agents generate higher total returns. Prosociality appears to mitigate rather than create efficiency losses, suggesting that discretion channels norm-sensitive loyalty rather than stakeholder redistribution.

Climate policy design must balance emissions mitigation with concerns for fairness, particularly as climate change disproportionately affects the poorest households within and across countries. Integrated Assessment Models used for global climate policy evaluation have so far typically not considered inequality effects within countries. To fill this gap, we develop a global Integrated Assessment Model representing national economies and subnational income, mitigation cost, and climate damage distribution and assess a range of climate policy schemes with varying levels of effort sharing across countries and households. The schemes are consistent with limiting temperature increases to 2 °C and account for the possibility to use carbon tax revenues to address distributional effects within and between countries. We find that carbon taxation with redistribution improves global welfare and reduces inequality, with the most substantial gains achieved under uniform taxation paired with global per capita transfers. A Loss and Damage mechanism offers significant welfare improvements in vulnerable countries while requiring only a modest share of global carbon revenues in the medium term. The poorest households within all countries may benefit from the transfer scheme, in particular when some redistribution is made at the country level. Our findings underscore the potential for climate policy to advance both environmental and social goals, provided revenue recycling mechanisms are effectively implemented. In particular, they demonstrate the feasibility of a welfare improving global climate policy involving limited international redistribution.

Understanding how banks react to unexpected events has become a very important economic and social question, especially since the financial crisis (Ivashina and Scharfstein, 2010; Puri et al., 2011). Whereas previous financial crises had largely stayed in the realm of finance, or very limited areas of the economy, the financial crisis of 2007-2008 demonstrated that unexpected financial shocks can have severe implications for the real economy in general, impacting the lives of a large cross-section of the population, for example through general reductions in employment (Chodorow- Reich, 2014; Popov and Rocholl, 2017). This new realization has led to an extensive literature on how banks react to unexpected events, especially if and how they transfer such shocks to firms and households. As a result, understanding exactly how shocks are transferred not only between banks (Popov and Udell, 2012; Schnabl, 2012), but also between banks and firms has become a crucial aspect of financial research (Peek and Rosengren, 2000; Gan, 2007; Ongena et al., 2015; Acharya et al., 2018; Gropp et al., 2018; Huber, 2018). It has returned into focus the idea that a functioning connection between banks and firms constitutes a crucial part of a well-functioning economy. This thesis aims to contribute to the understanding of how this bank-firm relationship functions and what pitfalls it might entail.

In this paper, we analyse the effects of the stimulus packages adopted by the German government during the Great Recession. We employ a standard medium-scale dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model extended by non-optimising households and a detailed fiscal sector. In particular, the dynamics of spending and revenue variables are modeled as feedback rules with respect to the cyclical component of output. Based on the estimated rules, fiscal shocks are identified. According to the results, fiscal policy, in particular public consumption, investment, transfers and changes in labour tax rates including social security contributions prevented a sharper and prolonged decline of German output at the beginning of the Great Recession, suggesting a timely response of fiscal policy. The overall effects, however, are small when compared to other domestic and international shocks that contributed to the economic downturn. Our overall findings are not sensitive to the allowance of fiscal foresight.