Der Einfluß von Führungsfunktionen auf das Regionaleinkommen: eine ökonometrische Analyse deutscher Regionen
Ulrich Blum
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 6,
2007
Abstract
We analyze the income position of German regions based on the concept of input potentials by estimating regional production functions. The concept, developed in the late 1970s, suggests that the regional production frontier depends on input capacities that can be over- or underutilized, once a benchmark, i.e. a national yardstick, is defined.
In this paper, this concept is taken up and applied to united Germany. Including variables that capture headquarter and R&D effects of firms on regional income to account for the entrepreneurial competence in regions extends a recent paper. It is shown that headquarter functions play a decisive role in describing the east-west income divide. In total, 85% of the East’s average income lag is explained by three factors: technology, headquarter functions, and transport accessibility.
Read article
Humankapital und Produktivität in Ostdeutschland
Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 6,
2007
Abstract
The paper shows that East Germany has a significant lower endowment with human capital compared to West Germany when actual professional activities are taken into account. This is by equal means due to a smaller share of human capital intensive industries and a lower human capital intensity in most industries. As a consequence, people with higher qualifications face severe difficulties to find a job in East Germany. This again is one reason for migration flows to West Germany, leading to a still worsening human capital endowment in the new Laender. It can be shown that lower human capital intensity is one reason for the still existing human capital gap between East and West Germany. Convergence prospects are therefore not as good as often supposed.
Read article
Lower Firm-Specific Productivity Levels in East Germany and East European Industrial Branches: The Role of Managerial Factors
Johannes Stephan
Germany Economic Performance: From Unification to Euroisation. Macmillan: Basingstoke,
2007
Abstract
This research assesses the firm-specific reasons for lower productivity levels between West and East German firms. The study is based on a unique data-base generated by field work in the four particularly important industrial sectors of machinery, furniture, cosmetics, and electrotechnics manufacturers and for the two East and West German regions, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Our results suggest that apparently management in industrial firms in the East still lack the kind of market-orientation that proves to be at the centre of competitiveness in a market and price-governed system of the modern western-style economy.
Read article
Interregional equalization policy in focus: Donor regions and beneficiary regions and their economic performance
Gerhard Heimpold, Peter Franz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 11,
2006
Abstract
The future of the interregional equalization policy in Germany is discussed intensively at present. While in the past the interest of equalization policy was focussed primarily on the regions which benefit from interregional equalization policy (beneficiary regions) and the effects obtained there, recently the view is directed also toward the regions which bear the fiscal burden of the equalisation policy (donor regions). Concerning the donor regions, a fear of growth-absorbing withdrawal effects exists, which gives reason in view of declining economic growth rates on the national level to think about the future of interregional equalization policy. The IWH contributed to this debate together with two project partners by an investigation, which was accomplished on behalf of the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning. The following findings will show the economic performance of the donor regions (exclusively West German regions) and of the beneficiary regions (all East German regions and a few West German regions) and their changing economic growth patterns. Concerning the level of economic performance, measured by means of the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, as expected, the donor regions, consisting of West German regions, in the period 1992-2003 altogether show an above average GDP per capita. In contrast, the beneficiary regions, both the East German and (less strongly) the West German show a GDP per capita below average. Concerning the development of the economic performance, which was measured on the basis of the relative GDP per capita (GDP per capita of the region concerned in relation to the national average), the East German beneficiary regions could catch up in the first period (1992-1998) strongly. This catching up process, however, clearly slowed down in the second period 1998-2003. Like a mirror-image the lead of the donor regions regarding GDP per capita in relation to the national average became smaller. But after 1998 many West German donor regions regained their growth dynamics. Additionally the contributions of the regions to the absolute increase of the GDP in the period 1998-2003 were investigated: 30 of 271 regions have a share of around 50% in the overall GDP increase, 28 of them located in West Germany, and 21 of them donor regions. This in mind, the policy should further provide and secure favourable development conditions for those regions, which contribute at most to the increase of the overall economic performance and thus create the economic base for the interregional equalization policy.
Read article
Firm-Specific Determinants of Productivity Gaps between East and West German Industrial Branches
Johannes Stephan
East-West Journal of Economics and Business,
2006
Abstract
This research assesses the firm-specific reasons for lower producitivity levels between West and East German firms. The study is based on a unique data-base generated by field-work in the two particularly important sectors of machinery manufacturers and furniture manufacturers. Our results suggest that the quality of human capital plays an important role in explaining lower productivity levels, as well as particularly networking activities, and the use of modern technologies for communication. Classifying those as management-functions beyond the organisation of the production process itself, we identify management deficits as the main specific determinants of productivity gaps between West and East German firms.
Read article
Can EU Policy Intervention Help Productivity Catch-Up?
Johannes Stephan, P. Holmes, J. Lopez-Gonzales, C. Stolberg
Closing the EU East-West Productivity Gap - Foreign direct Investment, Competitiveness, and Public Policy,
2006
Abstract
"A product of the Framework V research project, this book addresses one of the key problems facing the EU today: Why is the ‘new’ EU so much poorer than the ‘old’, and how will EU enlargement help to solve the problem? Focusing on the productivity problems underlying the East-West gap, it looks in particular at the role that foreign investment and R&D can play in closing it. Against that background, the book assesses what role proactive development policy might play in attacking the roots of low social productivity. Concluding that there will be a clear-cut process of convergence between East and West, albeit an incomplete one, it finishes with an assessment of the patterns of competitiveness, East and West, that are likely to emerge from this process of incomplete convergence."
Read article
East German economy: growth of production again behind in East-West comparison
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 7,
2006
Abstract
Das vergangene Jahr war kein gutes Jahr für die ostdeutsche Wirtschaft. Während im früheren Bundesgebiet der konjunkturelle Aufschwung einsetzte, stagnierte die gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktionsaktivität im Osten, ging die Beschäftigung zurück, und der Aufholprozeß kam trotz sinkender Einwohnerzahl nicht voran. Maßgeblich waren altbekannte Strukturschwächen, die im Jahr 2005 besonders stark zum Durchbruch kamen: der Wegfall der flutbedingten Sonderentwicklung in der Bauwirtschaft, die bis zum Vorjahr für zusätzliche Aufträge gesorgt hatte, und der Abbau der Beschäftigung im Staatssektor. Auch in diesem Jahr fordern die Strukturschwächen ihren Tribut, ihr Einfluß auf die Gesamtwirtschaft läßt jedoch nach. So verschaffen sich die Fortschritte bei Produktivität und Kosten im Unternehmenssektor mehr gesamtwirtschaftliche Geltung. Die noch im Jahr 2000 vorhandenen Nachteile, gemessen an den Lohnstückkosten, wurden in der Folgezeit durch moderate Lohnanstiege und Beschäftigungsrückgang abgebaut. Allerdings werden die geringen Lohnstückkosten durch das Ausscheren vieler Unternehmen aus der Tarifbindung und einen hohen Anteil des Niedriglohnsektors mitbestimmt. Trotzdem sind von der Kostenseite Voraussetzungen für das Ankoppeln an den konjunkturellen Aufschwung gegeben. Auch das Produktionspotential hat sich erhöht und läßt auf Wachstumsreserven schließen. Freilich sind die Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten überdurchschnittlich stark von der aktuellen Einkommenssituation und Fördermitteln abhängig. Die vorteilhaften Rahmenbedingungen auf der Angebotsseite werden jedoch im Prognosezeitraum nicht ausgeschöpft. Zwar werden die Warenlieferungen in das Ausland aufgrund der günstigen Länderstruktur überdurchschnittlich steigen und Unternehmensinvestitionen anregen, die Binnennachfrage in Ostdeutschland insgesamt wird jedoch angesichts der schwachen Einkommensperspektiven der privaten Haushalte gedrückt bleiben. Auch von den vorgezogenen Käufen an hochwertigen Gebrauchsgütern im Vorfeld der Anhebung der Mehrwertsteuer dürfte die ostdeutsche Wirtschaft in diesem Jahr aus strukturellen Gründen wenig profitieren. Eine Wende am Arbeitsmarkt ist nicht in Sicht. Die Beschäftigung sinkt weiterhin, obwohl die Arbeitsmarktpolitik stärker als im Westen stützend wirkt. Das Produktionswachstum resultiert vollständig aus der Steigerung der Arbeitsproduktivität. Der Produktivitätsabstand zum Westen stagniert. Die registrierte Arbeitslosigkeit steigt trotz des anhaltenden Beschäftigungsabbaus nicht, da das – an der Zahl der Erwerbsfähigen gemessene – Arbeitsangebot weiter abnimmt.
Read article
EU-Integration and the Prospects for Catch-up Development in CEECs - The Determinants of the Productivity Gap
Johannes Stephan
Endbericht des EU-Projekts HPSE-CT-2001-00065,
2004
Abstract
Read article
Workplace Equipment and Workplace Gap by Gender in East and West Germany
Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Johann Fuchs, Cornelia Lang
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 9,
2006
Abstract
The paper investigates (a) the number and structure of available jobs by gender in East and West Germany, (b) the gap between the supply and demand of jobs by gender in both regions and (c) the reasons for the wider “job gap” in East Germany compared with West Germany. The paper uses data from the Regional National Accounts and the Federal Labor Office. The analysis shows no significant difference in the number of jobs per 1000 persons in working age between East and West Germany. For women, the East German economy offers more jobs. Nevertheless, the gap between labour demand and the supply of jobs is wider in East Germany. This is caused not only by problems concerning the production structure, but also by the significantly higher partizipation rate of women in the labor market. Reasons are the traditional behaviour of East German woman and – compared with West Germany – the considerably lower household income.
Read article
Innovationskooperationen deutscher Unternehmen im europäischen und innerdeutschen Vergleich
Jutta Günther
Der Mittelstand an der Schwelle zur Informationsgesellschaft,
2005
Abstract
The study deals with innovation cooperation as a means to improve the competitiveness of enterprises. The empirical study compares the cooperation behaviour of innovative enterprises in Germany to other West European countries as well as between East and West Germany. The database used is the second Community Innovation Survey (CIS-2) of the EU. While German firms exhibit a cooperation frequency slightly below the average of the European Economic Area (EEA), enterprises in North European countries are by far most active with respect to cooperation frequency. The most important cooperation partner for firms in the EEA are other firms within the enterprise group, followed by suppliers and customers while German firms cooperate most frequently with universities. The comparative investigation of innovation cooperation in East and West Germany shows that East German firms cooperate more often than West German firms. However, a productivity advantage of cooperating firms against non-cooperating firms is only observable in West Germany. In East Germany, cooperating firms even exhibit a lower sales productivity than non-cooperating firms, which is explainable most probably through the fact that cooperation activities translate into productivity advantages only in the long run.
Read article