Rahmenbedingungen für einen erfolgreichen Technologietransfer und Perspektiven des Innovationsstandortes Sachsen
Jutta Günther
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 5,
2011
Abstract
Forschung und Entwicklung werden als Treiber des technischen Fortschritts und Garanten der internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit angesehen. Der Freistaat Sachsen nimmt hinsichtlich der Ausgaben für Forschung und Entwicklung im Vergleich zu den Neuen Ländern eine Spitzenposition ein und kann sich auch mit einer Reihe westdeutscher Länder messen, ausgenommen Baden-Württemberg, Bayern und Hessen. Die immer noch relativ niedrige Forschungsintensität der Wirtschaft im Vergleich zur öffentlichen Forschung ist strukturell bedingt. Auf
aggregierter Ebene kompensieren die öffentlichen Forschungsausgaben dieses transformationsbedingte „Defizit“. Mit Blick auf diese Situation besitzt der Technologietransfer zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, insbesondere
von Universitäten zu Unternehmen, eine hohe Bedeutung. Den Überlegungen der systemischen Innovationstheorie folgend sind verschiedene Kanäle des Transfers von Wissen zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft möglich. Dazu zählen die Auftragsforschung der Universitäten, Patentaktivitäten, Publikationen sowie Verbundprojekte. Die empirischen Befunde zu diesen ausgewählten Mechanismen des Technologietransfers lassen erkennen, dass der Freistaat Sachsen im Vergleich zu anderen Ländern eine solide Position einnimmt, aber auch noch Entwicklungspotenziale bestehen. Eine technologieoffen gestaltete Forschungspolitik kann dabei unterstützend wirksam sein.
Read article
Energetische Aufwertung vermieteter Mehrfamilienhäuser: Die kleinen Wohnungsanbieter tun sich schwer – Auswertungen auf Grundlage des ista-IWH-Energieeffizienzindex–
Sebastian Rosenschon, Claus Michelsen
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2011
Abstract
Das im Herbst 2010 vorgestellte Klimakonzept der Bundesregierung hat eine heftige Kontroverse über die Wirtschaftlichkeit energetischer Gebäudesanierungen nach sich gezogen. Der vorliegende Beitrag greift den Aspekt unterschiedlicher Eigentümerstrukturen im Mehrfamilienhausbereich auf und zeigt, dass die Ergebnisse energetischer Sanierungsmaßnahmen hinsichtlich der Größe eines Anbieters differenziert betrachtet werden müssen. Die einführende Diskussion theoretischer Argumente legt dabei nahe, dass große Immobilieneigentümer aufgrund ihrer Erfahrung in der Planung und Durchführung von Sanierungen sowie aufgrund von Größenvorteilen bei der Beschaffung und Ausführung von Bauleistungen zu geringeren Grenz- und Durchschnittskosten sanieren können. In
der Folge sollten bei diesen Anbietern nach Abschluss der Sanierung höhere Energieeffizienzniveaus zu beobachten sein. Hierfür können im Rahmen einer regressionsanalytischen Untersuchung starke Indizien präsentiert werden.
Die Sanierungsergebnisse unterscheiden sich signifikant: Während Kleinst- und Kleinanbieter mit einer Vollsanierung eine durchschnittliche Verbesserung der Energiekennwerte um 14,7% bzw. 16,7% erreichten, lag dieser Wert bei Großeigentümern bei 32,3%. Für politische Entscheidungen hinsichtlich der Fortentwicklung der Energieeinsparverordnung bedeutet dies, dass pauschale Vorschriften und Regelungen im Bestreben um mehr Energieeffizienz zu kurz greifen.
Read article
Cooperation propensity and public cooperation funding in the German Laser Industry
Muhamed Kudic, Katja Guhr, I. Bullmer, Jutta Günther
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 3,
2011
Abstract
The high-tech strategy of the federal government defines eight key technologies, including laser industry as a part of the optical technologies. This study provides a first descriptive overview of cooperation propensity and public cooperation funding for German Laser Source manufacturers between 1990 and 2010. Results show that the industry in general was characterized by expansion even though there were periods with a high degree of fluctuations. The spatial analysis of firm entries and exits reveals some interesting insights. The majority of large laser source companies are located in Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg and Thuringia. These regional distribution patterns hold for the absolute number of publicly funded cooperation projects. When considering the relative number of collaborative projects per firm and region the picture changes. It turns out that especially laser source manufacturers in Thuringia, Rhineland-Palatinate and Hamburg show up the highest cooperation propensities and an above-average demand for public funding.
Read article
Measuring Regionalized Knowledge Generation and Transfer – A Feasibility Study Using a Multi-layer Approach in the Free State of Saxony
Mirko Titze, Matthias Brachert, Jutta Günther, Michael Schwartz
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 5,
2010
Abstract
Economic literature regards knowledge creation and learning as critical elements for gaining competitive advantage of regions. However, recognizing the importance of innovation and knowledge creation to economic success is far from being novel. Original is the view of increasing importance of knowledge creation for speeding up the depreciation of existing knowledge stocks. This puts a high pressure on regional actors to constantly participate in innovation processes to maintain their competitive advantages. Against this background, regional actors – if they aim to be successful in the globalized economy – first require access to a comprehensive and diversified knowledge base. Second, they need to participate in the processes of knowledge generation and knowledge transfer. Thereby, systemic innovation theory has pronounced the view that the locus of innovation and knowledge creation resides not only within the boundaries of the regional actors, such as private firms, universities, research laboratories, suppliers, and customers, but is the result of an interdependent exchange process between these different types. Collaborative interactions, bringing together different types of actors, may therefore lie well at the heart of accelerated knowledge creation and learning at the regional level (Lundvall and Johnson 1994).
Read article
Creating Networks by Public Research Subsidies in Saxony?
Michael Schwartz, Nicole Nulsch, Jutta Günther
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 2,
2011
Abstract
It is generally acknowledged that research organizations require public support to perform research and development activities. In this context, projects grants play a continuously increasing role that, particularly, aim at strengthening network relationships among the actors within an innovation system. Given that, the Halle Institute for Economic Research has investigated whether public research subsidies (i.e. research grants) in the Free State of Saxony promote networks and provide the basis for future cooperation activities. Results of this study suggest that research grants in Saxony, given the self-assessment of the supported scientists, are conducive to the establishment of network relationships (including also industry actors) and can further contribute to make a better use of cooperation agreements in the future.
Read article
What are the benefits of cooperation and networking for the economic development of cities and metropolitan regions? Conference proceeding of the third “Halle Forum on Urban Economic Growth”
Christoph Hornych, Albrecht Kauffmann, M. Mühlberg, Martin T. W. Rosenfeld
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 1,
2011
Abstract
The Department of Urban Economics of the Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) held on 2 and 3 December 2010 the third “Halle Forum on Urban Economic Growth“. The biennial “Halle Forum” focuses on the determinants of urban growth. This year's conference addressed the forms and benefits of cooperation and networking for the economic development of cities and metropolitan regions. The presentations and discussions focused on the one hand on the effects and determinants of inter-and intra-regional cooperation between firms, and on the other hand on cooperation between neighboring municipalities, especially through the establishment of metropolitan regions.
Read article
Regional Entrepreneurial Opportunities in the Biotech Industry: Exploring the Transition from Award-winning Nascent Entrepreneurs to Real Start-ups
H. Wolf, Claus Michelsen, Michael Schwartz
Abstract
Knowledge of factors that determine the transition from nascent entrepreneurship into real entrepreneurship is of major importance for policies aiming to effectively stimulate start-ups. Whereas scholars concentrated on person-specific factors to explain transition probabilities, environmental characteristics have been fairly neglected. Given that entrepreneurship is a strongly localized phenomenon, this paper argues that regional entrepreneurial opportunities are a driving force behind the transition from nascent entrepreneurship to new venture creation. Based on unique data on 103 nascent entrepreneurs in the German biotechnology industry, we empirically assess the importance of regional entrepreneurial opportunities on transition probabilities. Further, we introduce a new
approach to measure nascent entrepreneurship by capturing individuals that actively participate in start-up competitions and have won at least one competition. Controlling for technology and individual characteristics, we find strong support for our hypotheses relating to the significant impact of general regional opportunities, specific regional opportunities and the entrepreneurial environment for the probability of transition from award-winning nascent entrepreneurs to real start-ups.
Read article
Analyzing Innovation Drivers in the German Laser Industry: the Role of Positioning in the Social and Geographical Space
Muhamed Kudic, Peter Bönisch, Iciar Dominguez Lacasa
Abstract
Empirical and theoretical contributions provide strong evidence that firm-level performance outcomes in terms of innovativeness can either be determined by the firm’s position in the social space (network effects) or by the firm’s position in the geographical space (co-location effects). Even though we can observe quite recently first attempts in bringing together these traditionally distinct research streams (Whittington et al. 2009), research on interdependent network and geographical co-location effects is still rare. Consequently, we seek to answer the following research question: considering that the effects of social and geographic proximity on firm’s innovativeness can be interdependent, what are the distinct and combined effects of firm’s network and geographic position on firm-level innovation output? We analyze the innovative performance of German laser source manufacturers between 1995 and 2007. We use an official database on publicly funded R&D collaboration projects in order to construct yearly networks and analyze firm’s network positions. Based on information on population entries and exits we calculate various types of geographical proximity measures between private sector and public research organizations (PRO). We use patent grants as dependent variable in order to measure firm-level innovation output. Empirical results provide evidence for distinct effect of network degree centrality. Distinct effect of firm’s geographical co-location to laser-related public research organization promotes patenting activity. Results on combined network and co-location effects confirms partially the existence of in-terdependent proximity effects, even though a closer look at these effects reveals some ambiguous but quite interesting findings.
Read article
Preventing Innovative Cooperations: The Legal Exemptions Unintended Side Effect
Christian Growitsch, Nicole Nulsch, Margarethe Rammerstorfer
European Journal of Law and Economics,
No. 1,
2012
Abstract
In 2004, European competition law had been considerable changed by the introduction of the new Council Regulation No. 1/2003. One of the major renewals was the replacement of the centralized notification system for inter-company cooperations in favor of a so-called legal exemption system. We analyze the implications of this reform and its arising uncertainty on the agreements firms implement, especially on innovative agreements like vertical R&D agreements. By means of a decision theoretic approach, we show that the law’s intention to reduce the incentive to establish illegal cartels will be reached but innovating cooperations might be prevented. To avoid this unintended side effect, fines but not the monitoring activities should be increased.
Read article