Professor Dr. Tobias Knedlik

Professor Dr. Tobias Knedlik
Aktuelle Position

seit 4/14

Research Professor

Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH)

seit 3/14

Professor für Volkswirtschaftslehre, insb. internationale Wirtschaft

Hochschule Fulda 

Forschungsschwerpunkte

  • Europäische und internationale Wirtschaftspolitik: insbesondere Finanzmarktkrisen
  • Außenwirtschaft, Währungspolitik, internationale Organisationen
  • Wachstum und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung

Tobias Knedlik ist seit April 2014 Forschungsprofessor am IWH. Seine Forschungsschwerpunkte liegen im Bereich Finanzkrisenprognose und -prävention. 

Tobias Knedlik ist Professor für Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Hochschule Fulda. Zuvor war er am IWH tätig.

Ihr Kontakt

Professor Dr. Tobias Knedlik
Professor Dr. Tobias Knedlik
Mitglied - Abteilung Makroökonomik
Nachricht senden

Publikationen

cover_intereconomics.jpg

On the Risk of a Sovereign Debt Crisis in Italy

Oliver Holtemöller Tobias Knedlik Axel Lindner

in: Intereconomics, im Erscheinen

Publikation lesen

cover_european-journal-of-political-economy.png

The Impact of Preferences on Early Warning Systems - The Case of the European Commission's Scoreboard

Tobias Knedlik

in: European Journal of Political Economy, 2014

Abstract

The European Commission’s Scoreboard of Macroeconomic Imbalances is a rare case of a publicly released early warning system. It allows the preferences of the politicians involved to be analysed with regard to the two potential errors of an early warning system – missing a crisis and issuing a false alarm. These preferences might differ with the institutional setting. Such an analysis is done for the first time in this article for early warning systems in general by using a standard signals approach, including a preference-based optimisation approach, to set thresholds. It is shown that, in general, the thresholds of the Commission’s Scoreboard are set low (resulting in more alarm signals), as compared to a neutral stand. Based on political economy considerations the result could have been expected.

Publikation lesen

cover_journal-of-international-money-and-finance.png

Predicting Financial Crises: The (Statistical) Significance of the Signals Approach

Makram El-Shagi Tobias Knedlik Gregor von Schweinitz

in: Journal of International Money and Finance, Nr. 35, 2013

Abstract

The signals approach as an early-warning system has been fairly successful in detecting crises, but it has so far failed to gain popularity in the scientific community because it cannot distinguish between randomly achieved in-sample fit and true predictive power. To overcome this obstacle, we test the null hypothesis of no correlation between indicators and crisis probability in three applications of the signals approach to different crisis types. To that end, we propose bootstraps specifically tailored to the characteristics of the respective datasets. We find (1) that previous applications of the signals approach yield economically meaningful results; (2) that composite indicators aggregating information contained in individual indicators add value to the signals approach; and (3) that indicators which are found to be significant in-sample usually perform similarly well out-of-sample.

Publikation lesen

Arbeitspapiere

cover_DP_2017-16.jpg

The Appropriateness of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure for Central and Eastern European Countries

Martina Kämpfe Tobias Knedlik

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 16, 2017

Abstract

The experience of Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) during the global financial crisis and in the resulting European debt crises has been largely different from that of other European countries. This paper looks at the specifics of the CEEC in recent history and focuses in particular on the appropriateness of the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure for this group of countries. In doing so, the macroeconomic situation in the CEEC is highlighted and macroeconomic problems faced by these countries are extracted. The findings are compared to the results of the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure of the European Commission. It is shown that while the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure correctly identifies some of the problems, it understates or overstates other problems. This is due to the specific construction of the broadened surveillance procedure, which largely disregarded the specifics of catching-up economies.

Publikation lesen

Cover_IWH-Discussion-Papers_2016.jpg

Three methods of forecasting currency crises: Which made the run in signaling the South African currency crisis of June 2006?

Tobias Knedlik Rolf Scheufele

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 17, 2007

Abstract

In this paper we test the ability of three of the most popular methods to forecast the South African currency crisis of June 2006. In particular we are interested in the out-ofsample performance of these methods. Thus, we choose the latest crisis to conduct an out-of-sample experiment. In sum, the signals approach was not able to forecast the outof- sample crisis of correctly; the probit approach was able to predict the crisis but just with models, that were based on raw data. Employing a Markov-regime-switching approach also allows to predict the out-of-sample crisis. The answer to the question of which method made the run in forecasting the June 2006 currency crisis is: the Markovswitching approach, since it called most of the pre-crisis periods correctly. However, the “victory” is not straightforward. In-sample, the probit models perform remarkably well and it is also able to detect, at least to some extent, out-of-sample currency crises before their occurrence. It can, therefore, not be recommended to focus on one approach only when evaluating the risk for currency crises.

Publikation lesen

Cover_IWH-Discussion-Papers_2016.jpg

The role of banking portfolios in the transmission from currency crises to banking crises - potential effects of Basel II

Tobias Knedlik Johannes Ströbel

in: IWH-Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 21, 2006

Abstract

Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die möglichen Effekte der Basel II-Bankenregulierung auf die Transmission von Währungskrisen zu Bankenkrisen. Die Analyse des Beispiels Südkorea zeigt die wichtige Rolle der Unausgeglichenheit von Bankaktiva und -passiva in bezug auf deren Fristigkeit und Währung bei diesem Transmissionsprozess und stellt dar wie Basel II auf die Bankenbilanzen gewirkt hätte. Es wird gezeigt, dass die regulatorischen Kapitalanforderungen unter Basel II, aufgrund der guten Kreditratings im Vorfeld der Krise, geringer gewesen wären als unter Basel I. Dadurch wäre die Krise verschärft worden. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit wird analysiert, ob die Ratingagenturen ihr Verhalten seit dem Versagen bei der Prognose der Asienkrise geändert haben. Dieser Beitrag findet keine empirische Evidenz für eine Berücksichtigung der Unausgeglichenheit in den Bankenbilanzen bei der Ableitung von Ratingergebnissen für Länder. Deshalb muss die Effektivität von Basel II bei der Prävention der Transmission von Währungs- zu Bankenkrisen sowohl im Falle Südkoreas als auch bei möglichen zukünftigen Krisen angezweifelt werden.

Publikation lesen
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoWeltoffen Logo